agentsclimarketplace

Branch pr

Skill LuchoC-Dev/agent-kits/skills/branch-pr

PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add LuchoC-Dev/agent-kits --skill branch-pr

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

6.5 KB, ~1.7k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Creating a pull request for any change
  • Preparing a branch for submission
  • Helping a contributor open a PR

Critical Rules

  1. Every PR MUST link an approved issue — no exceptions
  2. Every PR MUST have exactly one type:* label
  3. 5 automated checks must pass before merge is possible
  4. Blank PRs without issue linkage will be blocked by GitHub Actions

Workflow

1. Verify issue has `status:approved` label
2. Create branch: feat/*, fix/*, docs/*, refactor/*, chore/*
3. Implement changes
4. Run tests locally (unit + e2e)
5. Open PR using the template
6. Add exactly one type:* label
7. Wait for 5 automated checks to pass

Branch Naming (enforced by GitHub ruleset)

Branch names are validated by a GitHub ruleset. Pushes that don't match will be rejected.

Pattern: ^(feat|fix|chore|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|revert)\/[a-z0-9._-]+$

TypeBranch patternExample
Featurefeat/<description>feat/json-export-command
Bug fixfix/<description>fix/duplicate-observation-insert
Chorechore/<description>chore/bump-bubbletea-v0.26
Docsdocs/<description>docs/api-reference-update
Stylestyle/<description>style/fix-tui-alignment
Refactorrefactor/<description>refactor/extract-query-sanitizer
Performanceperf/<description>perf/optimize-fts5-queries
Testtest/<description>test/add-sync-coverage
Buildbuild/<description>build/update-go-toolchain
CIci/<description>ci/split-e2e-job
Revertrevert/<description>revert/broken-migration

Rules:

  • Description MUST be lowercase
  • Only a-z, 0-9, ., _, - allowed in description
  • No uppercase, no spaces, no special characters

PR Body Format

The PR template is at .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md. Every PR body MUST contain:

1. Linked Issue (REQUIRED)

Closes #<issue-number>

Valid keywords: Closes #N, Fixes #N, Resolves #N (case insensitive). The linked issue MUST have the status:approved label.

2. PR Type (REQUIRED)

Check exactly ONE in the template and add the matching label:

CheckboxLabel to add
Bug fixtype:bug
New featuretype:feature
Documentation onlytype:docs
Code refactoringtype:refactor
Maintenance/toolingtype:chore
Breaking changetype:breaking-change

3. Summary

1-3 bullet points of what the PR does.

4. Changes Table

| File | Change |
|------|--------|
| `path/to/file` | What changed |

5. Test Plan

- [x] Unit tests pass locally: `go test ./...`
- [x] E2E tests pass locally: `go test -tags e2e ./internal/server/...`
- [x] Manually tested the affected functionality

6. Contributor Checklist

All boxes must be checked:

  • Linked an approved issue
  • Added exactly one type:* label
  • Ran unit tests locally
  • Ran e2e tests locally
  • Docs updated if behavior changed
  • Conventional commit format
  • No Co-Authored-By trailers

Automated Checks (all 5 must pass)

CheckJob nameWhat it verifies
PR ValidationCheck Issue ReferenceBody contains Closes/Fixes/Resolves #N
PR ValidationCheck Issue Has status:approvedLinked issue has status:approved
PR ValidationCheck PR Has type:* LabelPR has exactly one type:* label
CIUnit Testsgo test ./... passes
CIE2E Testsgo test -tags e2e ./internal/server/... passes

Conventional Commits (enforced by GitHub ruleset)

Commit messages are validated by a GitHub ruleset. Commits that don't match will be rejected.

Pattern: ^(build|chore|ci|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|revert|style|test)(\([a-z0-9\._-]+\))?!?: .+

Format:

<type>(<optional-scope>): <description>
<type>(<optional-scope>)!: <description>   ← breaking change

Allowed types

TypePurposePR label
featNew featuretype:feature
fixBug fixtype:bug
docsDocumentation onlytype:docs
refactorCode refactoringtype:refactor
choreMaintenance, depstype:chore
styleFormatting, whitespacetype:chore
perfPerformance improvementtype:refactor
testAdding/fixing teststype:chore
buildBuild system changestype:chore
ciCI/CD changestype:chore
revertRevert previous commit(match original type)
feat! / fix!Breaking changetype:breaking-change

Rules

  • Type MUST be one of the listed values
  • Scope is optional, lowercase, allows a-z, 0-9, ., _, -
  • ! before : marks a breaking change
  • Description MUST start after : (colon + space)

Examples

feat(cli): add --json flag to session list command
fix(store): prevent duplicate observation insert on retry
docs(contributing): update workflow documentation
refactor(internal): extract search query sanitizer
chore(deps): bump github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea to v0.26
style(tui): fix alignment in session detail view
perf(store): optimize FTS5 query for large datasets
test(sync): add coverage for conflict resolution
ci(workflows): split e2e into separate job
fix!: change session ID format

Invalid examples (will be rejected)

Fix bug                          ← no type prefix
feat: Add login                  ← description should be lowercase
FEAT(cli): add flag              ← type must be lowercase
feat (cli): add flag             ← no space before scope
feat(CLI): add flag              ← scope must be lowercase
update docs                      ← no conventional commit format

Commands

# Create branch
git checkout -b feat/my-feature main

# Run tests before pushing
go test ./...                                    # unit tests
go test -tags e2e ./internal/server/...          # e2e tests

# Push and create PR
git push -u origin feat/my-feature
gh pr create --title "feat(scope): description" --body "Closes #N"

# Add type label to PR
gh pr edit <pr-number> --add-label "type:feature"

Gives 1 of the 12 instructions most pr commit review skills give in ~1.7k tokens

Counted across 1,055 of the 1,911 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06

  • Use conventional commit message formathere, and in 150 of 1055, across 145 files
  • Announce skill usage at startin 78 of 1055
  • Use imperative mood for commit descriptionsin 54 of 1055, across 51 files
  • Add directory to gitignore if not ignoredin 52 of 1055, across 41 files
  • Use imperative mood for commit subjectin 52 of 1055
  • Run tests to verify clean baselinein 42 of 1055, across 32 files
  • Push branch to originin 40 of 1055, across 38 files
  • Verify worktree directory is ignored before creationin 39 of 1055, across 32 files
  • Delete branches after mergingin 38 of 1055, across 30 files
  • Create worktree with new branchin 37 of 1055, across 32 files
  • Wrap body text at 72 charactersin 36 of 1055, across 34 files
  • Auto-detect and run project setupin 35 of 1055, across 27 files

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.