Research feishu report cocreate

Skill leohuang0423/deepresearch-report-feishu-skill/skills/openclaw/research-feishu-report-cocreate

Deep research report skill for Codex, Claude, and OpenClaw with Feishu-ready delivery

Install

npx -y skills add leohuang0423/deepresearch-report-feishu-skill --skill research-feishu-report-cocreate

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use for high-standard topic reports that need creator-first evidence, non-consensus synthesis, reader-first structure, structured dossiers, optional Feishu or HTML delivery, or bounded local-only synthesis.

SKILL.md

4.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Research Feishu Report Cocreation

Use this skill only for one task class:

high-standard topic-sharing report
multiple evidence objects
explicit audience and decision value
high-rework-cost convergence
optional structured delivery

It is not for:

generic writing
lightweight research
automatic product judgment or thesis generation
vague brainstorming without a report contract

Read first:

contracts/mode_policy.yaml
contracts/gates.yaml
references/workflow_v2.md

For heavy_topic_report, also read:

contracts/topic_report_brief.schema.yaml
contracts/expert_panels.yaml
contracts/rubric.yaml
contracts/state_machine.yaml
references/research_cocreate_rules.md
references/creator_first_source_rules.md
references/non_consensus_insight_rules.md
references/reader_first_narrative_rules.md
references/case_packet_rules.md
references/report_visual_rules.md
references/local_only_synthesis_rules.md

Load on demand:

references/native_dossier_rules.md
references/feishu_publish_qa_rules.md
references/interactive_html_render_rules.md
references/main_doc_review_rules.md
references/eval_rules.md

Mandatory clarification loop

Before deep research, figure planning, or drafting:

do one short framing pass
sketch the initial plan
scan the evidence boundary

Then ask the user 2-3 high-leverage clarification questions and wait for confirmation.

Prioritize:

audience
ideal-state result standard; make it as specific, evaluable, measurable, and quantifiable as possible
decision goal or quality bar
scope, source boundary, delivery shape, and must-include constraints

The clarification loop must align on what "excellent" looks like for this report using concrete acceptance criteria, evaluation dimensions, thresholds, examples, or numeric targets whenever possible.

Mode route

light: use the four-stage skeleton only
mid: expand one or two checkpoints
local_only_synthesis: keep the contract, compress intermediate states into final artifacts, and stay explicit about bounded evidence
heavy_topic_report: load contracts and follow the report-first path

Required heavy-mode panels:

ideal_state_panel
evidence_panel
acceptance_panel

Required heavy-mode sequence:

brief
research_question
thesis_card
evidence_map
outline_freeze
figure_plan
draft
review_panel
acceptance_panel

Required local_only_synthesis sequence:

brief
research_question
thesis_card
compressed_evidence_map
outline_freeze
draft
review_panel

Required heavy-mode artifacts:

brief.yaml
thesis_card.md
evidence_map.md
atomic_evidence.jsonl
case_packets/
figure_manifest.yaml
render_manifest.yaml
main_report.md
appendix.md
run_log.json

Required local_only_synthesis artifacts:

brief.yaml
main_report.md
appendix.md
run_log.json

Modules

topic_to_report
creator_source_mining
non_consensus_synthesis
narrative_architecture
case_packeting
report_visuals
local_only_synthesis
native_dossier
feishu_publish_qa
interactive_html_report

Boundaries

not a generic writer
not a generic researcher
not a product-judgment replacement
not allowed to skip expert-panel checkpoints in heavy mode
not allowed to continue into full research or drafting until 2-3 high-leverage clarification questions have been asked after the initial first pass, unless the user already made them explicit
not allowed to treat "good quality" as sufficient alignment; the ideal-state result standard must be frozen as specifically and measurably as the task allows
not allowed to skip the brief-to-outline path before drafting
not allowed to fake external validation or full publish assets in local_only_synthesis
not allowed to let market proof borrow certainty from mechanism proof
not allowed to output a final report without appendix, creator-first evidence traceability, case packets, and explicit go / no-go thresholds