agentsclimarketplace

Research feishu report cocreate

Skill leohuang0423/deepresearch-report-feishu-skill/skills/claude/research-feishu-report-cocreate

Deep research report skill for Codex, Claude, and OpenClaw with Feishu-ready delivery

Install
npx -y skills add leohuang0423/deepresearch-report-feishu-skill --skill research-feishu-report-cocreate

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Contract-first topic-report cocreation for creator-first evidence gathering, non-consensus synthesis, reader-first reporting, structured dossiers, optional Feishu or HTML delivery, and local-only synthesis packets.

SKILL.md

4.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Research Feishu Report Cocreation

Use only for high-standard topic-sharing reports with explicit audience, decision value, and structured delivery.

Start with:

  • contracts/mode_policy.yaml
  • contracts/gates.yaml
  • references/workflow_v2.md

If mode is heavy_topic_report, also load:

  • contracts/topic_report_brief.schema.yaml
  • contracts/expert_panels.yaml
  • contracts/rubric.yaml
  • contracts/state_machine.yaml
  • references/research_cocreate_rules.md
  • references/creator_first_source_rules.md
  • references/non_consensus_insight_rules.md
  • references/reader_first_narrative_rules.md
  • references/case_packet_rules.md
  • references/report_visual_rules.md
  • references/local_only_synthesis_rules.md

Load on demand:

  • references/native_dossier_rules.md
  • references/feishu_publish_qa_rules.md
  • references/interactive_html_render_rules.md
  • references/main_doc_review_rules.md
  • references/eval_rules.md

Mandatory clarification loop

Before deep research, figure planning, or drafting:

  • do one short framing pass
  • sketch the initial plan
  • scan the evidence boundary

Then ask the user 2-3 high-leverage clarification questions and wait for confirmation.

Prioritize:

  • audience
  • ideal-state result standard; make it as specific, evaluable, measurable, and quantifiable as possible
  • decision goal or quality bar
  • scope, source boundary, delivery shape, and must-include constraints

The clarification loop must align on what "excellent" looks like for this report using concrete acceptance criteria, evaluation dimensions, thresholds, examples, or numeric targets whenever possible.

Mode route

  • light: use the four-stage skeleton only
  • mid: expand one or two checkpoints
  • local_only_synthesis: keep the contract, compress intermediate states into final artifacts, and stay explicit about bounded evidence
  • heavy_topic_report: load contracts and follow the report-first path

Required heavy-mode panels:

  • ideal_state_panel
  • evidence_panel
  • acceptance_panel

Required heavy-mode sequence:

  • brief
  • research_question
  • thesis_card
  • evidence_map
  • outline_freeze
  • figure_plan
  • draft
  • review_panel
  • acceptance_panel

Required local_only_synthesis sequence:

  • brief
  • research_question
  • thesis_card
  • compressed_evidence_map
  • outline_freeze
  • draft
  • review_panel

Required heavy-mode artifacts:

  • brief.yaml
  • thesis_card.md
  • evidence_map.md
  • atomic_evidence.jsonl
  • case_packets/
  • figure_manifest.yaml
  • render_manifest.yaml
  • main_report.md
  • appendix.md
  • run_log.json

Required local_only_synthesis artifacts:

  • brief.yaml
  • main_report.md
  • appendix.md
  • run_log.json

Modules

  • topic_to_report
  • creator_source_mining
  • non_consensus_synthesis
  • narrative_architecture
  • case_packeting
  • report_visuals
  • local_only_synthesis
  • native_dossier
  • feishu_publish_qa
  • interactive_html_report

Boundaries

  • not a generic writing command
  • not a generic research command
  • not a replacement for user judgment
  • not allowed to skip expert-panel checkpoints in heavy mode
  • not allowed to continue into full research or drafting until 2-3 high-leverage clarification questions have been asked after the initial first pass, unless the user already made them explicit
  • not allowed to treat "good quality" as sufficient alignment; the ideal-state result standard must be frozen as specifically and measurably as the task allows
  • not allowed to skip the brief-to-outline path before drafting
  • not allowed to fake external validation or full publish assets in local_only_synthesis
  • not allowed to let market conclusions borrow certainty from mechanism evidence
  • not allowed to output a final report without appendix, creator-first evidence traceability, case packets, and explicit go / no-go thresholds

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.