Hr reviewer

Skill kyoungbinkim/give-me-job/skills/hr-reviewer

AI agent toolkit for Korean job applications, from resume evidence to tailored cover letters and interview prep

Install

npx -y skills add kyoungbinkim/give-me-job --skill hr-reviewer

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Review resumes, cover letters, application packages, and evidence maps from an HR perspective. Use when the user asks for 자기소개서 리뷰, 자소서 검토, HR 검토, 제출 전 점검, unsupported-claim detection, company-name residue checks, or risk-focused revision advice before applying.

SKILL.md

3.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

HR Reviewer

Review as a strict but practical HR screener. Prioritize risks that can cause rejection or weak interview defense.

Trigger

Use this skill after cover-letter-draft.md and evidence-map.md exist and before cover-letter-final.md is created.

Use it when the user asks for HR review, 자기소개서 리뷰, unsupported-claim detection, company-name residue checks, or final submission risk review.

Do Not Trigger

Do not use this skill as a substitute for resume intake, JD analysis, or cover letter drafting. Do not create final text when blockers remain.

Autonomy Level

DoF: LOW

Apply the checklist and blocker criteria deterministically. Do not soften blocker findings to keep the workflow moving.

Permitted inferences:

Interview defense risk from missing evidence, vague claims, or weak claim-to-evidence mapping.
Severity level from the blocker and warning criteria below.

Prohibited inferences:

Do not validate a claim as factual unless resume.md supports it.
Do not treat company values or JD wording as proof of the applicant's experience.

Input Contract

Required context:

Draft cover letter or resume text.
resume.md.
JD analysis or job posting.
applications/<company-role>/evidence-map.md when reviewing a cover letter package.

Optional context:

Company values analysis.
Length limit and counting rule.

Required parameters:

company: target company name.
role: target role title.

Outputs produced:

applications/<company-role>/hr-review.md

Inputs

draft cover letter or resume text
resume.md
JD analysis or job posting
optional company values analysis
length limit if available

Workflow

Check whether the answer satisfies the question.
Check JD fit and career-level fit.
Verify every strong claim against resume.md.
Flag invented or unsupported achievements.
Check company name, role name, and copy-paste residue.
Check readability, sentence length, repetition, and vague claims.
Generate 2-3 interview follow-up questions for each key claim.
Recommend concrete revisions.

Blocker Criteria

A finding is a Blocker if any condition below is true:

Category	Blocker Condition
Unsupported quantified claim	A metric, count, percentage, revenue, user count, rank, or award appears in the draft but not in `resume.md`.
Wrong company residue	Another target company, role, or product name remains in the draft.
Fabricated tool	A technology, tool, certification, or platform appears in the draft but not in `resume.md` or the user-provided context.
Length violation	Final or draft text exceeds the stated limit when the limit is known.
JD mandatory mismatch	The JD states a mandatory requirement and the draft claims fit without matching `resume.md` evidence.

A finding is a Warning when the claim is directionally plausible but thin, generic, too long, weakly connected to the JD, or difficult to defend in an interview.

Output

## HR Review
- Overall Score:
- Strong Points:
- Weak Points:
- Risky Claims:
- Missing Evidence:
- JD Fit:
- Company Fit:
- Interview Defense Risk:
- Blockers:
- Warnings:
- Interview Defense Questions:
- Recommended Revision:
- Final Submission Checklist:

Severity

Blocker: likely false, unsupported, wrong company, or submission-risk issue.
Major: weak evidence, poor fit, unclear role, or question mismatch.
Minor: style, compression, wording, or readability issue.

Fallback

If resume.md is missing, do not verify claims as factual. State that evidence validation is incomplete and ask for resume.md.