agentsclimarketplace

Sci literature vetting

Skill keithhegit/sci-using-kit/skills/sci-literature-vetting

A skill family for evidence-bounded SCI manuscript workflows: literature vetting, claim-evidence alignment, paper revision, reviewer preflight, LaTeX editing, and submission packaging.

Install
npx -y skills add keithhegit/sci-using-kit --skill sci-literature-vetting

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when adding, checking, repairing, or interpreting references, citations, related work, official documents, datasets, DOI links, or literature-supported claims in a SCI manuscript

SKILL.md

1.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

SCI Literature Vetting

Overview

Use this branch before any source becomes a citation or related-work claim.

Core principle: a reference is not usable until its identity and claim support are verified.

Required Checks

For every candidate source record:

  • title
  • authors or institution
  • venue/report/source type
  • year/date
  • DOI/arXiv/URL
  • source class: peer-reviewed, preprint, official doc, dataset, blog/news, user measurement
  • exact manuscript claim it supports

Citation Risk Labels

LabelMeaning
Direct citationVerified source directly supports the sentence.
Candidate citationReal source but support is indirect or narrow.
Background onlyUseful context but not claim support.
UnsafeHallucination risk, missing source identity, or unverifiable.

Workflow

  1. Build or update LITERATURE_MATRIX.md.
  2. Put each source into a risk label.
  3. Rewrite manuscript claims to match what the source actually supports.
  4. Do not cite search snippets, AI summaries, or memory alone.

Output

  • literature matrix rows
  • citation risk notes
  • safe replacement wording for manuscript sentences

Common Mistakes

  • Using secondary news as if it were an official report.
  • Treating a dataset/blog as proof of method performance.
  • Adding a citation that is real but does not support the sentence.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.