Sci literature vetting
Skill keithhegit/sci-using-kit/skills/sci-literature-vetting
A skill family for evidence-bounded SCI manuscript workflows: literature vetting, claim-evidence alignment, paper revision, reviewer preflight, LaTeX editing, and submission packaging.
npx -y skills add keithhegit/sci-using-kit --skill sci-literature-vettingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when adding, checking, repairing, or interpreting references, citations, related work, official documents, datasets, DOI links, or literature-supported claims in a SCI manuscript
SKILL.md
1.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
SCI Literature Vetting
Overview
Use this branch before any source becomes a citation or related-work claim.
Core principle: a reference is not usable until its identity and claim support are verified.
Required Checks
For every candidate source record:
- title
- authors or institution
- venue/report/source type
- year/date
- DOI/arXiv/URL
- source class: peer-reviewed, preprint, official doc, dataset, blog/news, user measurement
- exact manuscript claim it supports
Citation Risk Labels
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Direct citation | Verified source directly supports the sentence. |
| Candidate citation | Real source but support is indirect or narrow. |
| Background only | Useful context but not claim support. |
| Unsafe | Hallucination risk, missing source identity, or unverifiable. |
Workflow
- Build or update
LITERATURE_MATRIX.md. - Put each source into a risk label.
- Rewrite manuscript claims to match what the source actually supports.
- Do not cite search snippets, AI summaries, or memory alone.
Output
- literature matrix rows
- citation risk notes
- safe replacement wording for manuscript sentences
Common Mistakes
- Using secondary news as if it were an official report.
- Treating a dataset/blog as proof of method performance.
- Adding a citation that is real but does not support the sentence.