agentsclimarketplace

Planning software

Skill isvlasov/rageatc-oss/plugins/rageatc-code-oss/skills/planning-software

Practical Claude Code / Cowork plugins for sharper thinking and structured problem-solving the slow way

Install
npx -y skills add isvlasov/rageatc-oss --skill planning-software

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Transforms an approved enriched roadmap into an orchestration plan. Use when creating an orchestration plan, producing a build plan, or resuming a project from a saved plan. Not for roadmap creation/enrichment or workflow tier selection.

SKILL.md

5.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Planning Software

Produces an orchestration plan from an approved enriched roadmap. The plan is the orchestrator's execution contract — it records the workflow tier, tracks chunk progress, and holds everything project-specific a fresh session needs to resume; the execution protocol itself lives in orchestrating-software-dev, which any resuming session loads.

The plan describes process (agent sequence, review perspectives, gates); the roadmap describes content (what to build in each chunk). Separate documents, separate owners — never duplicate roadmap content into the plan.

Inputs (request anything missing before proceeding): approved enriched ROADMAP.md; workflow tier (decided upstream by orchestrating-software-dev); project name; confirmation that PRD.md and ARCHITECTURE.md exist (referenced, not duplicated).

Outputs: ORCHESTRATION-PLAN.md (the workflow contract) and an empty append-only ORCHESTRATION-LOG.md, both in the project root.

Not covered: roadmap creation/enrichment, tier selection, the per-chunk execution protocol and log entry format (both defined in orchestrating-software-dev).

Workflow

Step 1: Read the enriched roadmap

Read ROADMAP.md completely. Note: total chunk count and IDs; phased (Thorough) or flat; parallel dispatch annotations; any chunk already in-progress.

Step 2: Determine plan depth from workflow tier

TierPlan depth
QuickShort — no phases section, flat chunk list, no whole-project review step
StandardFull — sequential chunks, whole-project review at end
ThoroughFull with phases — phase groupings, parallel dispatch annotations, whole-project review at end

Step 3: Write the orchestration plan

Populate the Template below:

  • Header — project name, tier, date, pointers to upstream artefacts
  • Upstream steps — mark all complete (they are done by the time this skill runs). Quick lists PRD + architecture only; Standard/Thorough add interface design, decomposition, enrichment.
  • Build Progress — one todo per chunk, chunk-level only (no sub-steps); whole-project review entry for Standard/Thorough. Markers: [ ] not started, [~] in-progress, [x] complete.
  • Execution — pointer to the per-chunk protocol plus the review perspectives resolved for this tier.
  • Completion — Quick omits; Standard/Thorough point to Stage 9 (whole-project review and user emulation).
  • Resumption Note — tells a fresh session how to find the current position.

Step 4: Initialise ORCHESTRATION-LOG.md

Create it with a header comment only — the entry format lives in orchestrating-software-dev:

# Orchestration Log

<!-- Append-only. Do not edit previous entries. -->

Template

Adapt to the workflow tier per the annotations.

# Orchestration Plan — [Project Name]

**Tier:** [Quick / Standard / Thorough]
**Created:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Roadmap:** ROADMAP.md
**PRD:** PRD.md
**Architecture:** ARCHITECTURE.md

---

## Upstream Steps

- [x] PRD — PRD.md
- [x] Architecture — ARCHITECTURE.md
[Standard/Thorough add:]
- [x] Interface Design — .interface-design/system.md (if project has UI)
- [x] Decomposition — ROADMAP.md (structure)
- [x] Enrichment — ROADMAP.md (executable)

---

## Build Progress

<!-- Update status markers as work proceeds: [ ] not started, [~] in-progress, [x] complete -->

- [ ] chunk-001: [name]
- [ ] chunk-002: [name]
[... repeat for all chunks ...]
[Standard/Thorough add:]
- [ ] Whole-project review

---

## Execution

For each chunk, in dependency order, run the Per-Chunk Execution Protocol from the orchestrating-software-dev skill.

**Review perspectives (resolved for this tier):**

[Quick:]
- spec-compliance

[Standard:]
- spec-compliance → code-quality → design-compliance (if system.md exists and chunk touches UI)

[Thorough:]
- spec-compliance → code-quality → design-compliance (if system.md exists and chunk touches UI) → security (if chunk handles user input or sensitive data)

---

## Completion

[Quick: omit this section]

[Standard/Thorough:]

After all chunks are marked complete, run Stage 9 (Completion Review — whole-project review, then user emulation) from the orchestrating-software-dev skill.

---

## Resumption Note

New session? Read this file. Find the first `[~]` or `[ ]` chunk in Build Progress. Resume from there using the Per-Chunk Execution Protocol from orchestrating-software-dev.

Edge Cases

Resuming mid-chunk: for a [~] chunk, check ORCHESTRATION-LOG.md for the last completed step, re-read the chunk from ROADMAP.md, and resume where the developer-agent left off.

Tier change after plan creation: do not modify an existing plan's tier mid-project. If scope expands significantly, note it in ORCHESTRATION-LOG.md and create a revised plan.

Parallel chunks (Thorough only): note parallelisable chunks in Build Progress (e.g., - [ ] chunk-003: [name] [parallel with chunk-004]); dispatch concurrently when file sets do not conflict.

Quick tier with security concern: override the spec-compliance-only default — load the security perspective for any chunk handling authentication, user input, or sensitive data.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.