Codify
Skill isvlasov/rageatc-oss/plugins/rageatc-core-oss/skills/codify
Practical Claude Code / Cowork plugins for sharper thinking and structured problem-solving the slow way
npx -y skills add isvlasov/rageatc-oss --skill codifyAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Sweep the project's LEARNINGS.md inbox and turn accumulated entries into durable skill, rule, or documentation changes. Run when ready to process learnings — not mid-task.
SKILL.md
3.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Codify
Step 1 — Read the inbox
Read LEARNINGS.md at the project root. Candidates are entries without a Codified → marker. If there are none, report that and stop. If the file doesn't follow the standard ## YYYY-MM-DD — Title entry format (e.g. a numbered takeaways list), treat each discernible item as an entry and place markers where they unambiguously attach to the item.
Step 2 — Cluster
Group candidate entries that share a root cause or a target file. A pattern across several entries is stronger evidence than any single entry — codify the pattern, not each instance.
Step 3 — Find the structural fix
The entry recorded the symptom and (usually) the likely cause at capture time. Now do the analysis the capture deliberately skipped: ask why the system allowed the failure, and what change prevents recurrence.
Test every proposed fix: would it have prevented the original incident even if nobody remembered the learning? "Be more careful" or "remember to X" fails this test — put the knowledge where the future reader will already be looking (the skill they will load, the rule that is always in context, the template they will copy). Prefer the smallest change that passes.
Some entries need no fix: a durable technical fact (version pin, API quirk) with no better home is already serving its purpose where it is. Others are not ready — a single incident with an unclear cause stays in the inbox until the pattern repeats.
Step 4 — Choose the target
| Learning kind | Target |
|---|---|
| Workflow or process failure in plugin-orchestrated work | rageatc skill, agent, or rule — record as a proposal; implement in the rageatc workshop, never in the installed plugin |
| Project-specific convention or constraint | Project CLAUDE.md or .claude/rules/ |
| Technical fact about the project's stack | Project docs (ARCHITECTURE.md, reference docs) — or the entry itself if no better home exists |
| Behaviour that should apply across all projects | ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md |
Step 5 — Get approval
Present the proposals as a compact list — entries covered, root cause, proposed change, target file — and get a decision on each. Implement only what is approved.
Step 6 — Apply and annotate
Apply approved changes to in-reach targets now. rageatc proposals are handed to the user for the workshop — do not edit plugin files from a consuming project.
Append a marker line to each processed entry:
_Codified → <target file> (YYYY-MM-DD)_— change applied_Codified → proposal: <target> (YYYY-MM-DD)_— rageatc proposal recorded, pending workshop_Codified → retained in place (YYYY-MM-DD)_— the entry is itself the durable record
This marker is the one sanctioned exception to the file's append-only rule.
Step 7 — Report
Summarise per entry: codified where, proposed for what, or left in the inbox and why.