Review seo

Skill gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/skills/review-seo

Stack-agnostic agentic-programming workflow skills + documentation scaffold

Install

npx -y skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow --skill review-seo

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

19 stars19 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Internal SEO review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks changed web pages/routes for indexability, metadata, and structured data — applies only to public web surfaces. Findings only; never edits code.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

2.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Review SEO (internal)

Composed by review-change / product-audit within their conversation — on any agent, follow this file inline as the routed step. Findings only; never edits, never refactors.

Scope

The diff or path/glob the caller passes; default the current change vs the default branch. State the scope at the top of the returned table.

Checklist (evaluate EVERY item — none is optional; n/a must be stated)

✓ Read the project's SEO doc first (e.g. docs/frontend/SEO.md) — n/a all items with the reason if the product has no public web surface
✓ Every new/changed public page has a unique title and meta description within the project's declared lengths
✓ Canonical URL correct on new/changed routes (no accidental duplicates)
✓ Indexability intended = indexability actual (robots/noindex/sitemap state matches the page's purpose)
✓ One h1 per page; heading levels don't skip
✓ Structured data valid for the content type the project declares (cite the validator output when run)
✓ Links crawlable (real hrefs, not click handlers) on changed navigation
✓ Images on changed pages have descriptive filenames/alt where the SEO doc requires
✓ No render-blocking regression for primary content (content present without JS where the project declares SSR/SSG)

Return exactly

REVIEW SEO — scope: <scope>

| # | Finding | Sev | Evidence | Suggested fix |
|---|---------|-----|----------|---------------|
| 1 | <what>  | critical|major|minor | <file:line> | <smallest action> |

Checklist: <n> evaluated, <n> pass, <n> findings, <n> n/a (<which + why>)
Summary: <1-2 sentences>
Decision: PASS | FAIL

FAIL if any critical or major finding is open; PASS otherwise. Minor findings never block — they route to the caller's triage step.

Done when

Every checklist item was evaluated with evidence (file:line or command output) or explicitly marked n/a with the reason.
The fixed-format block above is returned — nothing more, nothing less — and no code was changed.