Audit pr

Audit PR

The manager's "can this ship?" gate. A read-first audit over the entire PR — its SPEC, all phases, docs, tests, CI, and review axes — that returns a single verdict: merge-ready or a ranked list of blockers. Never edits, never refactors. By default it never merges either — the human decides and merges. The one exception is the opt-in auto-merge below: a documented policy (or an explicit user instruction) plus a fail-closed pre-merge checklist.

Turn contract — verify before ending the turn

✓ The verdict block was printed in the fixed format: `VERDICT: MERGE-READY | BLOCKED` with ranked, evidenced blockers
✓ The PR's FULL URL is printed in the verdict header (the user may be juggling
  several projects and agents without a CI monitor — the link in the chat is
  the contract, never "PR #N" alone)
✓ MERGE-READY verdict? Then the MERGE-READY comment was POSTED on the PR
  (`gh pr comment --body-file` RUN, idempotent by SHA marker) — a comment,
  never a commit-message tag. BLOCKED → no comment posted
✓ Nothing was edited or refactored; nothing was merged UNLESS the auto-merge
  policy applied AND the pre-merge checklist was RUN with its output pasted
✓ Closure integrity was evaluated and its result stated explicitly: pass /
  blocker / warning / n-a (fix-governed PRs are always n-a; never skipped
  silently)
✓ Scope integrity (descope) was evaluated and its result stated explicitly:
  pass / blocker / n-a (no unit-referencing issues born on the branch → n-a;
  never skipped silently)
✓ The closing `→ Next:` block is printed as the ABSOLUTE last output

About to end the turn with any box unchecked? The turn is NOT done — complete the missing box first (weak models drop end-of-document duties; this list is first on purpose).

When to use

• After the work is "done" and before merging — the final gate once review-change is clean and all phases are committed.
• When you want one defensible answer to "is this PR actually ready?" rather than trusting that every loose end was tied off.

review-change reviews the diff for quality; audit-pr audits the PR as a unit of delivery — that everything the SPEC promised is present, traceable, and green.

Scope

The whole pull request: the branch vs. the default base, plus its SPEC and planning artifacts, the roadmap entry, the doc map, the PR body, issue links, and CI. Default target is the current branch's PR; accept a PR number to target another.

Step 0 — Discover the project & the PR (always first)

1. Project contract. Per the agent guide's Workflow conventions + documentation map, then read what THIS skill needs: the roadmap, the feature/fix templates, and the project's verification gate (type-check / tests / build / CI).
2. The PR. Identify it and read it in full (forge CLI per the project's Workflow conventions — examples use gh):

   gh pr view <N> --json number,title,body,baseRefName,headRefName,isDraft,mergeable,mergeStateStatus,files,commits,statusCheckRollup,closingIssuesReferences
   

   If no PR number is given, resolve the current branch's PR (gh pr view --json ...). If none exists yet, audit the branch vs. the default base and say "no PR open yet" — the contract still applies.
3. The SPEC. Locate the governing SPEC — docs/features/<NN>-<slug>/ (feature) or docs/fix/<n>-<topic>/ (fix) — and its planning artifacts (PLAN.md, TASKS.md, progress.md, testing.md, known-issues.md, decisions.md) when present. The SPEC is the source of truth for what "done" means.

Merge-readiness contract

Check each gate; cite evidence (file:line, criterion, check name, issue number). A gate that can't be confirmed is a blocker, not a pass — never assume green.

Gate	What it means	Blocker when
Acceptance criteria	Every SPEC acceptance criterion is satisfied, each mapped to concrete evidence (code, test, or doc).	Any criterion unmet, unverifiable, or silently dropped.
All phases complete	Feature: every phase in PLAN.md/TASKS.md is done and logged in progress.md. Fix: the SPEC is fully implemented.	Any unchecked task or unimplemented phase without an explicit, tracked deferral.
Scope integrity (creep)	The PR implements the SPEC and no more; out-of-scope work was split out.	Undocumented scope creep, or in-scope work missing.
Docs updated	Every "Affected docs" criterion is satisfied; per-phase docs (progress/testing/known-issues/decisions) reflect reality; the doc map still resolves. Never merge with documentation still pending.	A doc the map or SPEC requires is stale, missing, pending, or contradicts the code.
Traceability	Closes #N is in the PR body when the work is issue-born (from plan-feature-from-issue or plan-fix); the roadmap/fix-index entry matches, is still present (removed only after merge, never before), and carries the linked PR reference (done · [#<pr>](<pr-url>)).	Issue-born work without Closes #N; a roadmap/index entry out of sync; the entry dropped before merge; or a done row without its PR link.
Tests	New behavior is covered at the right layer (prefer integration); acceptance criteria map to tests; no regression-risk tests left red.	New behavior untested, or tests assert nothing meaningful.
Verification gate / CI	The project's gate passes — type-check, tests, build — and statusCheckRollup is green.	Any required check failing, pending, or absent where the project requires one.
Mergeability	Branch is off the default base, independently mergeable (no conflicts), not stacked on another PR, not draft.	Wrong base, conflicts, stacked dependency, or still draft.
Review axes clean	The applicable review-change axes are clean or every remaining finding is consciously deferred to a tracked issue with a trigger.	A fix-now finding still open, or a deferral with no issue/trigger behind it.
Closure integrity	The governing feature SPEC's capability closure was taken and recorded — design-feature was actually run, not bypassed. Fix-governed PRs: n/a (no closure block by design).	A present Capability closure block has a blank row, or a resolved non-n/a row with no matching acceptance criterion.
Scope integrity (descope)	An issue born during this unit that maps to an unmet SPEC acceptance criterion or phase task has a matching, user-approved, dated ## Amendments entry — descoped scope was recorded, not silently exported. Detection is two-path: a slug/issue-number text match, or an issue linked from an ## Amendments row (#89) — either is sufficient to enumerate the issue, so a descoped issue with a generic title/body is not invisible to the gate.	An issue born since branch divergence that references this unit (by either detection path) maps to an unmet criterion/task with no matching ## Amendments entry, or an ## Amendments row that is undated, unapproved, or unlinked to an issue.

Run review-change for the axis check if it hasn't been run on the final state, or read its latest report. Don't re-litigate findings already classified — verify each open one is either resolved or has a real, tracked home.

Closure integrity — fixed output. Detection is purely mechanical: grep the governing SPEC for a Capability closure heading — match the heading text, not a fixed level (SPECs nest it as ### Capability closure under ## Product half; older ones use ## Capability closure) — never dates, never versions, never judgment.

• Fix-governed PR (docs/fix/<n>-<topic>/SPEC.md) → n/a, always. Fix SPECs carry no closure block by design; never emit a warning for one.
• Feature SPEC, block present → evaluate the three boxes, each a blocker on failure:
  1. the block exists in the SPEC (true whenever this path is reached)
  2. zero blank rows — every entity/capability/role row is either filled (UI + API + test) or carries an explicit n/a: <reason>
  3. every resolved non-n/a row maps to a listed acceptance criterion n/a: <reason> is a fully valid, passing row — the gate verifies the decision was taken and recorded, never that UI/API surface exists. Never push a blank row into inventing surface to pass this gate.
• Feature SPEC, block absent → the SPEC predates or bypassed design-feature. Never a blocker — emit a dated warning, PR still merges:

  design-debt: closure absent, SPEC predates the rule (dated <YYYY-MM-DD>)
  

  This warning is itself the retrofit trigger: the next unit of work that touches this feature must fill the closure via /design-feature <slug> (upsert — fills only the missing rows, destroys nothing recorded) before that new work is planned. See design-feature's upsert semantics for the other half of this contract.

done ≠ merge-ready. A unit flips to done when its PR opens (built, not merged — merge state lives in the forge). So a done roadmap row is not evidence of merge-readiness: this gate still has to pass on its own. The two things this gate most often catches on a done-but-unmerged unit are pending docs and a prematurely-removed issue/fix-index entry — both are blockers.

Scope integrity (descope) — fixed output. A cheap way to look finished is to quietly convert unfinished SPEC scope into a follow-up issue — the unit reads as done, the scope silently moved to the backlog. This gate catches it mechanically, keyed off the same ## Amendments log execute-phase's descope guard writes to (single source — see that skill's Descope guard section):

1. List issues born since the branch diverged (git log <base>..HEAD --format=%ad --date=short | tail -1 for the earliest commit date, then gh issue list --state all --search "created:>=<date>") that reference this unit, via either of two detection paths — a hit on either is sufficient, run both, never only the first:
   • text match — title/body mentions the feature/fix slug or issue number, or
   • ## Amendments link (#89) — the issue is linked from a row in the governing SPEC's ## Amendments section (the same log execute-phase's descope guard writes to — single source, see that skill's Descope guard), regardless of the issue's own title/body text. This closes the coverage gap a generic-titled or slug-unaware descoped issue leaves in the text-match path alone: an issue linked from an amendment row is unambiguously about this unit no matter what it's titled.
2. For each such issue (from either path), run the per-issue checklist:
   • ✓ the SPEC criterion/task it touches is still met in the PR — pass, it's discovered work or already covered, or
   • ✓ a matching ## Amendments entry exists in the governing SPEC (dated, user-approved, and linked to this issue's number) — pass, the descope was properly recorded
   • neither holds → BLOCKER.
3. Symmetrically, every ## Amendments row in the governing SPEC must itself be dated, user-approved, and link a real, existing issue — an ## Amendments row missing any of those is also a BLOCKER (a hollow amendment is the same failure as no amendment at all).

• Scope: any SPEC-governed PR — feature and fix alike, both carry acceptance criteria a lazy run could export. No issues born during the unit, or none referencing it → the gate passes (nothing was exported).
• This gate never re-litigates whether the original criterion was reasonable — only whether its descope, if any, was recorded and approved before the issue was filed.
• Backstop, not primary. execute-phase's creation-time descope guard (skills/execute-phase/SKILL.md Descope guard) is the primary control — it stops a descope from ever reaching an issue without an approved ## Amendments entry first. This gate is the backstop that catches what the primary control missed (a descope-filed issue from a session that bypassed the guard, or a hand-filed issue). The ## Amendments -link detection path (#89) widens this backstop's coverage only — it changes nothing about execute-phase's own contract or precedence.

Process

1. Gather — Step 0: project contract, PR, SPEC + artifacts, CI status.

2. Walk the contract — evaluate every gate above against evidence. For each, record pass / blocker / n-a with the specific artifact or check that proves it.

3. Confirm deferrals are real — for anything postponed (an unchecked task, a review finding, a known issue), verify a tracked issue + trigger exists. A deferral with no destination is a blocker, not a pass.

4. Decide — one verdict:

   • MERGE-READY — every applicable gate passes; list the few things the human should still eyeball (the manual-verification items review-change surfaced).
   • BLOCKED — one or more gates fail; output the ranked blocker list.

5. Persist blockers to the fold ledger (BLOCKED verdict only). Every blocker on a BLOCKED verdict is, by definition, fix-now — merge is gated on it. Append each to the unit's fix-now fold ledger review-findings.md (same location and fixed schema | id | file:line | axis | severity | class | route | folded | as review-change's persist step) — the same ledger, not a separate one (D4: the fold cycle consumes one list). Merged unit → no write — check gh pr view --json state; MERGED skips the persist step entirely. For each blocker: file:line = the cited evidence location (the gate name when no single line applies); axis = the gate name (e.g. Tests, Docs, Traceability); severity = high (a blocker gates the merge by definition); class = fix-now; route = the routing this skill's own Routing section assigns to that kind of blocker; folded starts no. Re-runs dedupe by file:line + axis, identical to review-change's rule — a blocker already on the ledger at that file:line+axis is not re-appended; a genuinely new blocker gets the next Fn id.

6. Post the MERGE-READY comment on the PR (MERGE-READY only). The verdict must be visible on the PR itself — as a comment, never in a commit message (a commit trailing "MERGE-READY" pollutes history and goes stale the moment the branch moves). Write the body to a file (Markdown rule — see Guardrails) and run gh pr comment <N> --body-file <path> with exactly this body:

   <!-- audit-pr:merge-ready sha=<head SHA> -->
   ## ✅ audit-pr: MERGE-READY
   
   - **Audited head:** `<head SHA>` · CI: <green|local-gate-green>
   - **Date:** <YYYY-MM-DD>
   - **Before merge, a human should still verify:**
     - <manual-verification item — or "nothing">
   
   Any commit after `<head SHA>` voids this verdict — re-run `audit-pr`.
   

   Idempotent: first check the existing comments (gh pr view <N> --json comments) for the <!-- audit-pr:merge-ready --> marker — same SHA already commented → skip (say so); older SHA → post the new comment (the newest marker wins). Never post a comment for a BLOCKED verdict — blockers go in the chat report only, so the PR page never shows a stale green flag.

7. Auto-merge check (only on MERGE-READY) — evaluate the opt-in auto-merge section below. Policy present + pre-merge checklist green → merge and report the merge evidence. Otherwise the human merges — say so explicitly.

8. Report — the verdict block below, always headed by the PR's full URL.

Auto-merge (opt-in — default is the human merges)

By default this skill never merges. It merges a MERGE-READY PR only when both keys hold:

1. Written authorization. The project's docs state the policy — e.g. merge: auto / merge: fullauto in the agent guide's Workflow conventions or the committed decision record (docs/features/SHIP_DECISIONS.md) — or the user explicitly instructed it in this conversation ("merge it if merge-ready"). An inferred preference, a past session, or convenience is never authorization.

2. Pre-merge checklist — RUN it fresh, paste the outputs; fail-closed (any box that cannot be evaluated counts as failed):

   ✓ VERDICT is MERGE-READY, issued in THIS turn, bound to the PR's current
     head SHA (re-check the head via the forge — any later commit voids it)
   ✓ `git status --porcelain` → empty (nothing uncommitted — code or docs)
   ✓ `git fetch` + `git status -sb` (on the PR branch) → neither ahead nor
     behind its remote (nothing unpushed, nothing unpulled)
   ✓ Remote head SHA == the SHA this audit evaluated
   ✓ CI re-checked green on that exact SHA via the forge at merge time (no-CI
     project: a fresh local gate run on that SHA, output pasted)
   ✓ The PR touches no declared sensitive area and contains no destructive
     (data-deleting / schema-destructive) diff
   ✓ The forge accepts the merge (a refusal — branch protection, conflicts —
     parks the PR; never bypass, never force)
   

3. Anything pending → do NOT merge, even with authorization. Uncommitted or unpushed work would make the PR's CI result stale the moment it lands. The sequence is fixed: route the pending work (commit + push via execute-phase's fold cycle) → wait for CI on the new head → re-run audit-pr → only a fresh MERGE-READY on the new SHA may merge. Never merge on a stale verdict.

After a successful merge: print the merged PR URL + merge SHA, and route the post-merge close-out (pull the default branch; remove/archive the fix-index entry per the project's convention — only now, never before).

Verdict format

PR #<N> — <title>
URL: <full PR URL — always printed; the user works across several projects
     and not every agent shows a CI monitor or PR list>
Base: <default> ← Head: <branch> @ <head SHA>   CI: <green|failing|pending>

VERDICT: MERGE-READY | BLOCKED (<count> blockers)

Blockers (ranked):
  1. [<gate>] <what's wrong> — evidence: <file:line | check | criterion>
     → fix: <smallest action to clear it> (<route>)
  ...

Warnings (non-blocking — never change the verdict):
  - design-debt: closure absent, SPEC predates the rule (dated <YYYY-MM-DD>)

Non-blocking nits:
  - <minor item> — <pointer>

Before merge, a human should still verify:
  - <manual-verification item from review-change>

→ Next:
  Print the ONE verdict bullet that matches, THEN — if a closure warning fired —
  also print the closure bullet (a warning never blocks, so it co-occurs with a
  MERGE-READY verdict; the two lines print together, never one instead of the other):
  · MERGE-READY, no auto-merge policy → you merge: <full PR URL>, then
    /plan-feature --next (the next roadmap unit) or pick an issue with /triage-issue
  · MERGE-READY, auto-merge authorized → merged (URL + merge SHA above), then
    /plan-feature --next or /triage-issue
  · MERGE-READY but pending commit/push/pull found → NOT merged: commit + push,
    wait for CI, re-run /audit-pr (a fresh verdict on the new SHA decides)
  · BLOCKED → clear the top blocker (routed above), then re-run /audit-pr
  · Closure warning (in addition to the verdict above) or a closure blocker →
    /design-feature <slug> — fills the missing closure rows (upsert, destroys
    nothing) before further work on this feature is planned; re-run /audit-pr after
  · Scope-bleed blocker → record the missing `## Amendments` entry (user-approved,
    dated, linking the issue) in the governing SPEC, or re-classify the issue as
    genuinely discovered work via /triage-issue; re-run /audit-pr after

If MERGE-READY, omit the blocker list and state it plainly: nothing blocks merge. The → Next: block is always printed — on MERGE-READY it repeats the full PR URL (merge it yourself, or the merged link) and points the user at the next concrete unit so a finished feature never dead-ends at the merge.

Example (generic — substitute your project's numbers and gates):

PR #142 — Add CSV export to the reports view
Base: main ← Head: feat/14-csv-export   CI: green

VERDICT: BLOCKED (2 blockers)

Blockers (ranked):
  1. [Tests] Export handler has no test — acceptance criterion "export
     round-trips the rows" is unverified
     → fix: add an integration test for the handler (fold into the current phase)
  2. [Traceability] PR body is missing `Closes #131` for issue-born work
     → fix: add `Closes #131` to the PR body (execute-phase)

Non-blocking nits:
  - Help text wording diverges from the other commands — docs/USAGE.md

Before merge, a human should still verify:
  - The exported file opens cleanly in a spreadsheet app (visual)

Routing (blockers, by kind)

• Incomplete in-scope work → fold into this branch via execute-phase (the relevant phase or --fix); re-run audit-pr after.
• Out-of-scope defect surfaced → plan-fix (new fix entry), not this PR.
• Deferred finding lacking a home → triage-issue to file + classify it.
• Stale/missing docs → update per the doc map (often a quick execute-phase doc commit), then re-audit.
• Red CI / failing gate → report the failing check; the dev fixes on-branch.

Guardrails

• Read-first verdict. Never push, edit, or refactor. The only forge writes this skill may perform: (1) the MERGE-READY comment (Process step 6 — idempotent, comment-only, never a commit tag), and (2) the opt-in auto-merge — written policy or explicit instruction, MERGE-READY on the current SHA, pre-merge checklist green, outputs pasted. One key missing → the human ships.
• Forge bodies are Markdown, not shell — never hand-escape. The comment's backticks are formatting; a \ before them renders literally. Write the body to a file and pass --body-file <path> — never inline --body "…" or a quoted heredoc. Verify with gh pr view <N> --json comments that no literal \` survived.
• Never merge with anything uncommitted, unpushed, or unpulled — even when auto-merge is authorized. Pending work makes the CI evidence stale: commit + push, wait for CI, re-audit, and only the fresh verdict may merge.
• Never report MERGE-READY on an unconfirmed gate — absence of evidence is a blocker.
• Don't re-run the full review from scratch; compose review-change and verify its open findings are resolved or tracked.
• Honor the project's Workflow conventions (gate, docs-language, evidence — every blocker cites file:line/check/criterion/issue — track-don't-inline: out-of-scope problems become issues/fix entries, never silent additions here).

Portability (agents other than Claude Code)

The workflow is the contract; Claude Code features are conveniences. On an agent that lacks one, apply the fallback — never skip the step the feature enables:

• No slash-command menu — where this skill says /<skill>, open that skill's SKILL.md (wherever your agent installed the skills) and follow it literally, in a fresh conversation: hand-offs assume a clean context.
• No per-skill model:/effort: — on the #claude branch the frontmatter pins these tiers; here, pick tiers yourself: the merge gate is the highest-stakes automated verdict — run it on your strongest model, never on the cheap tier that wrote the code.

Relationship to other skills

execute-phase (all phases done) ─▶ review-change (axes clean) ─▶ audit-pr ─▶ merge
                                                                    │
                          blockers ─┬─ in-scope  ▶ execute-phase ──┘ (re-audit)
                                    ├─ out-of-scope ▶ plan-fix
                                    └─ deferral     ▶ triage-issue

• Consumes review-change (axis cleanliness) and the artifacts of plan-feature / plan-fix / execute-phase (SPEC, phases, docs, Closes #N).
• audit-docs is the cross-document coherence check; audit-pr is per-PR merge readiness; product-audit is the periodic, product-wide full sweep.

Done when

• Every applicable gate has a pass / blocker / n-a verdict backed by cited evidence.
• A single top-line verdict (MERGE-READY or BLOCKED with ranked blockers) is reported with the PR's full URL in the header, each blocker routed, with the human's manual-verification list explicit.
• On MERGE-READY the auto-merge check was evaluated explicitly: merged with the checklist output pasted (authorized + clean), or handed to the human with the URL, or held back pending commit/push/pull with the re-audit sequence printed.
• The closing → Next: block is printed (merge link → then the next unit via /plan-feature --next or /triage-issue; BLOCKED → the routed fix, then re-audit).
• Nothing was edited or refactored; any merge is traceable to the policy key and the pasted checklist.