Review a11y

Skill gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/skills/review-a11y

Stack-agnostic agentic-programming workflow skills + documentation scaffold

Install

npx -y skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow --skill review-a11y

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

19 stars19 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Internal accessibility review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks the changed user-facing surface for accessibility: semantics, keyboard, focus, contrast, and ARIA correctness — applies only to user-facing surfaces. Findings only; never edits code.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

2.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Review Accessibility (internal)

Composed by review-change / product-audit within their conversation — on any agent, follow this file inline as the routed step. Findings only; never edits, never refactors.

Scope

The diff or path/glob the caller passes; default the current change vs the default branch. State the scope at the top of the returned table.

Checklist (evaluate EVERY item — none is optional; n/a must be stated)

✓ Semantic elements over generic ones (button not clickable div; headings in order; landmarks present) ✓ Every input has an associated label; every image an alt (empty alt only when decorative) ✓ Full keyboard operability of the changed surface (tab order, Enter/Space activation, Escape to dismiss) ✓ Focus management on dynamic changes (modals trap + restore focus; route changes move focus) ✓ Contrast of changed text/UI meets the project's declared level (default WCAG AA) — cite computed values where checkable ✓ ARIA used correctly and only when semantics can't do it (wrong ARIA is a major finding) ✓ No information conveyed by color alone ✓ Motion/animation respects reduced-motion preferences (n/a if no motion added) ✓ Error messages programmatically associated with their fields

Return exactly

REVIEW ACCESSIBILITY — scope: <scope>

| # | Finding | Sev | Evidence | Suggested fix |
|---|---------|-----|----------|---------------|
| 1 | <what>  | critical|major|minor | <file:line> | <smallest action> |

Checklist: <n> evaluated, <n> pass, <n> findings, <n> n/a (<which + why>)
Summary: <1-2 sentences>
Decision: PASS | FAIL

FAIL if any critical or major finding is open; PASS otherwise. Minor findings never block — they route to the caller's triage step.

Done when

Every checklist item was evaluated with evidence (file:line or command output) or explicitly marked n/a with the reason.
The fixed-format block above is returned — nothing more, nothing less — and no code was changed.