Review a11y
Internal accessibility review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks the changed user-facing surface for accessibility: semantics, keyboard, focus, contrast, and ARIA correctness — applies only to user-facing surfaces. Findings only; never edits code.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow --skill review-a11yAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 19 stars19 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
2.4 KB, 466 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Review Accessibility (internal)
Composed by review-change / product-audit within their conversation — on any
agent, follow this file inline as the routed step. Findings only; never edits,
never refactors.
Scope
The diff or path/glob the caller passes; default the current change vs the default branch. State the scope at the top of the returned table.
Checklist (evaluate EVERY item — none is optional; n/a must be stated)
✓ Semantic elements over generic ones (button not clickable div; headings in order; landmarks present) ✓ Every input has an associated label; every image an alt (empty alt only when decorative) ✓ Full keyboard operability of the changed surface (tab order, Enter/Space activation, Escape to dismiss) ✓ Focus management on dynamic changes (modals trap + restore focus; route changes move focus) ✓ Contrast of changed text/UI meets the project's declared level (default WCAG AA) — cite computed values where checkable ✓ ARIA used correctly and only when semantics can't do it (wrong ARIA is a major finding) ✓ No information conveyed by color alone ✓ Motion/animation respects reduced-motion preferences (n/a if no motion added) ✓ Error messages programmatically associated with their fields
Return exactly
REVIEW ACCESSIBILITY — scope: <scope>
| # | Finding | Sev | Evidence | Suggested fix |
|---|---------|-----|----------|---------------|
| 1 | <what> | critical|major|minor | <file:line> | <smallest action> |
Checklist: <n> evaluated, <n> pass, <n> findings, <n> n/a (<which + why>)
Summary: <1-2 sentences>
Decision: PASS | FAIL
FAIL if any critical or major finding is open; PASS otherwise. Minor findings never block — they route to the caller's triage step.
Done when
- Every checklist item was evaluated with evidence (file:line or command output) or explicitly marked n/a with the reason.
- The fixed-format block above is returned — nothing more, nothing less — and no code was changed.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most review quality skills give in 466 tokens
Counted across 1,273 of the 2,403 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Ask one question at a timein 63 of 1273, across 62 files
- Provide a recommended answer for each questionin 47 of 1273, across 45 files
- Rank findings by severityin 44 of 1273
- Use parameterized queries for database accessin 38 of 1273, across 20 files
- Validate all user input with schemasin 33 of 1273, across 15 files
- Store secrets in environment variablesin 32 of 1273, across 14 files
- Explore the codebase to answer questionsin 31 of 1273, across 29 files
- Store tokens in httpOnly cookiesin 30 of 1273, across 12 files
- Implement rate limiting on API endpointsin 30 of 1273, across 12 files
- Sanitize user-provided HTMLin 29 of 1273, across 11 files
- Return generic error messages to usersin 28 of 1273, across 10 files
- Cite file and line for every findingin 28 of 1273, across 25 files
Said here and by no other author read
- State the scope at the top of the table
- Cite computed contrast values
- Mark items as n/a with reasons
- Return only the specified fixed-format block
- Fail if any critical or major finding exists
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.