agentsclimarketplace

Uiux toolkit

Skill georgekhananaev/claude-skills-vault/.claude/skills/uiux-toolkit

A curated collection of high impact skills for Claude Code designed to supercharge the senior full stack workflow. This vault automates the repetitive parts of development like architectural reviews, TDD cycles, and PR management so you can stay in flow. It is a force multiplier for shipping clean, production ready code at scale. πŸš€βš‘οΈ

Install
npx -y skills add georgekhananaev/claude-skills-vault --skill uiux-toolkit

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Comprehensive UX/UI evaluation meta-skill combining design theory and UX methodology. Use when conducting UI/UX audits, visual design reviews, accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.2), user flow analysis, responsive testing, interaction design evaluation, or design system audits. Evaluates using Nielsen's heuristics, Gestalt principles, typography theory, color theory, and modern methodologies (OOUX, JTBD, Cognitive Walkthrough).

SKILL.md

5.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

UI/UX Toolkit

Professional UX/UI evaluation across 9 domains. Combines design theory w/ UX methodology. Framework-agnostic for web, mobile & desktop.

Audit Type Selection

NeedLoad
Full UX AuditALL references
Visual Designvisual-design.md + interaction-review.md
Accessibilityaccessibility-inspector.md
Usabilityheuristic-audit.md + user-flow-analysis.md
Responsive/Mobileresponsive-behavior.md
Design Systemdesign-system-audit.md
Contentcontent-ux-audit.md
AI Interfaceai-ux-patterns.md
Privacy/Ethicsprivacy-ethics-audit.md

Sub-Workflows

DomainReferencePurpose
Visualreferences/visual-design.mdHierarchy, typography, color, Gestalt, spacing
Heuristicreferences/heuristic-audit.mdNielsen's 10 + modern methods
A11Yreferences/accessibility-inspector.mdWCAG 2.2 AA/AAA, keyboard, screen readers
Flowreferences/user-flow-analysis.mdTask paths, friction, cognitive load
Responsivereferences/responsive-behavior.mdBreakpoints, touch, RTL/LTR, PWA
Interactionsreferences/interaction-review.mdMicro-interactions, animations, feedback
Design Systemreferences/design-system-audit.mdToken consistency, component audit
Contentreferences/content-ux-audit.mdUX writing, readability, voice & tone
AI/MLreferences/ai-ux-patterns.mdExplainability, trust, error handling
Privacyreferences/privacy-ethics-audit.mdDark patterns, consent, GDPR/DSA

Quick Start

1. Define Scope

Audit Scope:
β”œβ”€β”€ Screens: [target screens]
β”œβ”€β”€ Flows: [primary tasks, conversion paths]
β”œβ”€β”€ Platform: [Web/iOS/Android/Desktop/All]
β”œβ”€β”€ WCAG: [A/AA/AAA]
└── Focus: [Visual/A11Y/Usability/Perf]

2. Select Type

TypeRefsCoverage
Quick Visualvisual-design.mdDesign theory
Quick A11Yaccessibility-inspector.mdAutomated + keyboard
Heuristicheuristic-audit.mdNielsen's 10
FullAll 9 refsComplete eval
Focused2-3 refsTargeted review

3. Execute

Each ref contains checklists w/ pass/fail criteria, severity & remediation.

Severity

LevelImpactAction
πŸ”΄ CriticalBlocks task/accessFix immediately
🟠 Major>50% users affectedFix before release
🟑 Minor<50% users affectedNext sprint
🟒 EnhancementPolish/delightBacklog

Priority Matrix

         HIGH FREQ
            β”‚
    β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
    β”‚ MAJOR β”‚ CRIT  β”‚
    β”‚ (P1)  β”‚ (P0)  β”‚
LOW β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€ HIGH
IMP β”‚ ENH   β”‚ MINOR β”‚ IMP
    β”‚ (P3)  β”‚ (P2)  β”‚
    β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
         LOW FREQ

Effort

LevelExamples
LowCSS fix, alt text, label
MedComponent refactor, validation
HighNav restructure, focus mgmt

Quick Checklist

β–‘ Hierarchy    β†’ Importance clear? (Squint test)
β–‘ Typography   β†’ Readable, scale, max 2-3 fonts?
β–‘ Color        β†’ Contrast, semantic, 60-30-10?
β–‘ Spacing      β†’ 8pt grid, consistent rhythm?
β–‘ Gestalt      β†’ Items grouped logically?
β–‘ Usability    β†’ Actions discoverable, feedback clear?
β–‘ A11Y         β†’ WCAG AA, keyboard, screen reader?
β–‘ Consistency  β†’ Design system followed?
β–‘ Content      β†’ Clear, scannable, actionable?
β–‘ Responsive   β†’ All breakpoints, touch-friendly?

Scoring

GradeCriteria
AProfessional, polished, accessible, delightful
BSolid fundamentals, minor refinements
CFunctional w/ notable issues
DUsable w/ significant problems
FMajor usability/a11y failures

Output Format

## UX Eval: [Component/Page]

### Scope
- Platform: [Web/iOS/Android]
- WCAG: [AA/AAA]
- Domains: [List]

### Assessment
[1-2 sentence summary + grade A-F]

### Critical (P0)
- **[Issue]**: [Desc]
  - *Principle*: [violated]
  - *Fix*: [rec]
  - *Effort*: [L/M/H]

### Major (P1) / Minor (P2) / Enhancements (P3)
[Same format]

### Strengths
- [What works]

### Priority Actions
1. [Top fix]
2. [Second]
3. [Third]

Anti-Patterns

PatternCategorySev
Confirm-shamingDarkπŸ”΄
Hidden costsDarkπŸ”΄
Keyboard trapsA11YπŸ”΄
No loading feedbackVisibility🟠
Color-only indicatorsA11Y🟠
Auto-play video+soundAttention🟠
Infinite scroll w/o footerNav🟑

Methodologies

MethodFocusUse
Cognitive WalkthroughTask completionComplex flows
OOUXObject-noun consistencyIA
JTBDJob storiesFeature validation
GestaltVisual groupingLayout
BaymardE-commerceShopping flows

Platform Testing

PlatformAutoManual
Webaxe-core, LighthouseDevTools, keyboard
iOSAccessibility InspectorVoiceOver
AndroidAccessibility ScannerTalkBack
DesignStark, Contrast pluginsReview

Load references/*.md for detailed checklists & criteria.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.