agentsclimarketplace

Data migration

Skill geoffsdesk/portage/skills/data-migration

Agent-driven EKS to GKE migrations. PSO-grade outcomes, no PSO required.

Install
npx -y skills add geoffsdesk/portage --skill data-migration

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Plan and (with confirmation) execute data migrations from AWS data services to GCP equivalents — RDS to Cloud SQL or AlloyDB, ElastiCache to Memorystore, S3 to GCS, MSK to GCP Kafka or Confluent Cloud — and the secrets/config moves that go with them. Produces per-data-system runbooks, replication plans, validation gates, and cutover scripts. Use after storage-translation, when "plan our RDS migration", "migrate Redis to Memorystore", or "data layer plan for the GKE move".

SKILL.md

8.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Data Migration Router

You plan and run the data layer of an EKS-to-GKE migration: managed databases, caches, queues, object storage, secrets. You produce per-system runbooks, then with explicit confirmation, drive the actual move.

Purpose

Convert "we have RDS Postgres, ElastiCache Redis, three S3 buckets, and MSK" into a moved, validated, observable GCP state — without dropping data, without unbounded downtime, and with a rollback path at every step. Routes database and data pipeline migration requests to specialized sub-procedures, ensuring all cross-cloud egress ([LFF-01]) and connectivity boundaries ([LFF-12], [LFF-13]) are validated prior to execution.

When to use this skill

  • Phase 4 of a Portage migration.
  • The user asks to "plan the data migration", "migrate RDS to Cloud SQL", "move S3 to GCS for the migration".

Prerequisites

  • 01-discovery/inventory.json data dependencies section.
  • 02-assessment/readiness-report.md with effort estimate per system.
  • 03-landing-zone/plan.md with the data-prod project provisioned.
  • Egress Budget Sign-Off ([LFF-01]): Section 7 of readiness-report.md must contain an executed model from tools/egress-estimator/egress_estimator.py.
  • Deny-by-Default HITL Confirmation: Any mutation (dms start-replication-task, gcloud sql instances promote) requires interactive confirmation displaying command line and cost estimates.
  • IAM permissions in source AWS for dms:* (where DMS is in scope) and read on source data systems.
  • IAM permissions in GCP for the data services in scope (cloudsql.admin, redis.admin, etc.).

Procedure

Step 1 — Route to Sub-Procedure by System Type

For each data system in inventory.json, identify the store type and delegate to the corresponding sub-module:

  • PostgreSQL / Cloud SQL: See postgres.md (includes public DNS/IP SSL allowlisting, [LFF-12], [LFF-13], [LFF-15]).
  • MySQL / Cloud SQL: See mysql.md (includes GTID_MODE and binlog retention rules).
  • Redis / Memorystore: See redis.md (includes RIOT-X seed and cache stampede strategies).
  • S3 / GCS Storage Transfer: See s3.md (includes Storage Transfer Service incremental sync).
  • Kafka / MSK Strimzi: See kafka.md (includes MirrorMaker 2 and consumer offset translation).
  • Secrets Manager / Secret Manager: See secrets.md (includes External Secrets Operator bindings).
  • DynamoDB / AlloyDB Re-platforming: See dynamodb.md (covers heterogeneous moves).

Step 2 — Co-existence connectivity

If the GKE workload needs to call back to the AWS data system during co-existence (and vice versa), plan:

  • VPN or Cloud Interconnect between AWS VPC and GCP VPC.
  • Allow-list updates to source data systems' security groups (allow GCP CIDRs).
  • TLS / network policy parity.
  • Bandwidth budget: project peak data movement at the planned co-existence window. Surface costs explicitly.

Step 3 — Per-system runbook with explicit gates

For each system, render a runbook (use templates/runbook-template.md) with:

  • Pre-flight checklist.
  • Cutover steps with expected commands and outputs.
  • Validation gate after each step.
  • Rollback procedure for each step (linking to rollback-playbook).
  • Decommission steps and timing.

Step 4 — Drive the migration (with explicit confirmation)

For each system:

  1. Surface the full runbook to the user. Ask explicit confirmation: "Begin replication for prod-payments-db? Estimated initial sync: 4–6 hours. Cost: $X."
  2. On confirmation, execute step-by-step. After each step, run the validation gate. If a gate fails, stop, do not proceed.
  3. Log every command executed and its output to 10-data-migration/<system>/execution.log.

The agent never destructively modifies the source. The agent never bypasses a failed gate.

Decision points

DecisionDefaultWhen to deviate
Postgres / MySQL replication toolDMSpglogical native if DMS network constraints
Redis seed strategyRebuildable → empty target; durable → snapshot importOnline tail-based replication for true zero-downtime
S3 → GCS engineStorage Transfer Servicegsutil/gcloud storage for one-shot, small datasets
MSK targetConfluent Cloud on GCPSelf-managed Kafka if cost or operator is fluent
DynamoDB targetOut of scope; re-platform project(No default)
Soak duration on source14 days read-only7 days for non-prod, longer for tier-0

Outputs / Deliverables

10-data-migration/
├── plan.md                       # Index of all systems
├── <system-1>/
│   ├── runbook.md
│   ├── pre-flight-checks.md
│   ├── execution.log              # Filled in during execution
│   ├── validation-gates.md
│   └── rollback.md                # Links into rollback-playbook
├── <system-2>/
└── escalations.md

Validation

For each system, the cutover gate criteria must be defined and met before declaring complete:

  • Postgres / MySQL: replication lag < target SLA for ≥ 5 min, row counts match for top 10 tables, sample row hashes match.
  • Redis: target writeable + readable, app smoke tests pass on cached paths.
  • S3 → GCS: object count matches, sample hashes match, lifecycle rules verified active on GCS.
  • Kafka: consumer offset translation verified, MM2 lag ≈ 0, end-to-end produce → consume across both sides works.

Escalation triggers

  • Heterogeneous data store moves (DynamoDB, Aurora→AlloyDB, Neptune, Redshift→BigQuery). Surface as scoping requirements.
  • Datasets where the time-to-replicate exceeds the user's available window.
  • Encryption key migrations that cannot reuse a CMEK approach (HSM-only key material). Surface for KMS planning.
  • Any source data system with no acceptable cutover window AND no application-native replication. The migration stops until the user agrees to: (a) accept downtime, (b) rebuild downstream with new write-path, or (c) defer this system out of the migration.

Common pitfalls

  • Egress during co-existence routinely runs 5–10× the unbudgeted estimate. Model it explicitly per-workload at assessment time and monitor near-real-time during execution. See LFF-01.
  • Cross-cloud bulk transfer over open internet bottlenecks at default Linux TCP buffers. Tune net.ipv4.tcp_{r,w}mem before measuring throughput; otherwise you'll mis-time the cutover window. See LFF-11.
  • Cloud SQL connection methods. Public IP is convenient but private IP via VPC peering or PSC is standard for prod. Use Cloud SQL Auth Proxy sidecar or Workload Identity-aware connector.

References

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.