Data migration
Agent-driven EKS to GKE migrations. PSO-grade outcomes, no PSO required.
npx -y skills add geoffsdesk/portage --skill data-migrationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Plan and (with confirmation) execute data migrations from AWS data services to GCP equivalents — RDS to Cloud SQL or AlloyDB, ElastiCache to Memorystore, S3 to GCS, MSK to GCP Kafka or Confluent Cloud — and the secrets/config moves that go with them. Produces per-data-system runbooks, replication plans, validation gates, and cutover scripts. Use after storage-translation, when "plan our RDS migration", "migrate Redis to Memorystore", or "data layer plan for the GKE move".
SKILL.md
8.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Data Migration Router
You plan and run the data layer of an EKS-to-GKE migration: managed databases, caches, queues, object storage, secrets. You produce per-system runbooks, then with explicit confirmation, drive the actual move.
Purpose
Convert "we have RDS Postgres, ElastiCache Redis, three S3 buckets, and MSK" into a moved, validated, observable GCP state — without dropping data, without unbounded downtime, and with a rollback path at every step. Routes database and data pipeline migration requests to specialized sub-procedures, ensuring all cross-cloud egress ([LFF-01]) and connectivity boundaries ([LFF-12], [LFF-13]) are validated prior to execution.
When to use this skill
- Phase 4 of a Portage migration.
- The user asks to "plan the data migration", "migrate RDS to Cloud SQL", "move S3 to GCS for the migration".
Prerequisites
01-discovery/inventory.jsondata dependencies section.02-assessment/readiness-report.mdwith effort estimate per system.03-landing-zone/plan.mdwith thedata-prodproject provisioned.- Egress Budget Sign-Off (
[LFF-01]): Section 7 ofreadiness-report.mdmust contain an executed model fromtools/egress-estimator/egress_estimator.py. - Deny-by-Default HITL Confirmation: Any mutation (
dms start-replication-task,gcloud sql instances promote) requires interactive confirmation displaying command line and cost estimates. - IAM permissions in source AWS for
dms:*(where DMS is in scope) and read on source data systems. - IAM permissions in GCP for the data services in scope (
cloudsql.admin,redis.admin, etc.).
Procedure
Step 1 — Route to Sub-Procedure by System Type
For each data system in inventory.json, identify the store type and delegate to the corresponding sub-module:
- PostgreSQL / Cloud SQL: See postgres.md (includes public DNS/IP SSL allowlisting,
[LFF-12],[LFF-13],[LFF-15]). - MySQL / Cloud SQL: See mysql.md (includes
GTID_MODEand binlog retention rules). - Redis / Memorystore: See redis.md (includes
RIOT-Xseed and cache stampede strategies). - S3 / GCS Storage Transfer: See s3.md (includes Storage Transfer Service incremental sync).
- Kafka / MSK Strimzi: See kafka.md (includes MirrorMaker 2 and consumer offset translation).
- Secrets Manager / Secret Manager: See secrets.md (includes External Secrets Operator bindings).
- DynamoDB / AlloyDB Re-platforming: See dynamodb.md (covers heterogeneous moves).
Step 2 — Co-existence connectivity
If the GKE workload needs to call back to the AWS data system during co-existence (and vice versa), plan:
- VPN or Cloud Interconnect between AWS VPC and GCP VPC.
- Allow-list updates to source data systems' security groups (allow GCP CIDRs).
- TLS / network policy parity.
- Bandwidth budget: project peak data movement at the planned co-existence window. Surface costs explicitly.
Step 3 — Per-system runbook with explicit gates
For each system, render a runbook (use templates/runbook-template.md) with:
- Pre-flight checklist.
- Cutover steps with expected commands and outputs.
- Validation gate after each step.
- Rollback procedure for each step (linking to
rollback-playbook). - Decommission steps and timing.
Step 4 — Drive the migration (with explicit confirmation)
For each system:
- Surface the full runbook to the user. Ask explicit confirmation: "Begin replication for
prod-payments-db? Estimated initial sync: 4–6 hours. Cost: $X." - On confirmation, execute step-by-step. After each step, run the validation gate. If a gate fails, stop, do not proceed.
- Log every command executed and its output to
10-data-migration/<system>/execution.log.
The agent never destructively modifies the source. The agent never bypasses a failed gate.
Decision points
| Decision | Default | When to deviate |
|---|---|---|
| Postgres / MySQL replication tool | DMS | pglogical native if DMS network constraints |
| Redis seed strategy | Rebuildable → empty target; durable → snapshot import | Online tail-based replication for true zero-downtime |
| S3 → GCS engine | Storage Transfer Service | gsutil/gcloud storage for one-shot, small datasets |
| MSK target | Confluent Cloud on GCP | Self-managed Kafka if cost or operator is fluent |
| DynamoDB target | Out of scope; re-platform project | (No default) |
| Soak duration on source | 14 days read-only | 7 days for non-prod, longer for tier-0 |
Outputs / Deliverables
10-data-migration/
├── plan.md # Index of all systems
├── <system-1>/
│ ├── runbook.md
│ ├── pre-flight-checks.md
│ ├── execution.log # Filled in during execution
│ ├── validation-gates.md
│ └── rollback.md # Links into rollback-playbook
├── <system-2>/
└── escalations.md
Validation
For each system, the cutover gate criteria must be defined and met before declaring complete:
- Postgres / MySQL: replication lag < target SLA for ≥ 5 min, row counts match for top 10 tables, sample row hashes match.
- Redis: target writeable + readable, app smoke tests pass on cached paths.
- S3 → GCS: object count matches, sample hashes match, lifecycle rules verified active on GCS.
- Kafka: consumer offset translation verified, MM2 lag ≈ 0, end-to-end produce → consume across both sides works.
Escalation triggers
- Heterogeneous data store moves (DynamoDB, Aurora→AlloyDB, Neptune, Redshift→BigQuery). Surface as scoping requirements.
- Datasets where the time-to-replicate exceeds the user's available window.
- Encryption key migrations that cannot reuse a CMEK approach (HSM-only key material). Surface for KMS planning.
- Any source data system with no acceptable cutover window AND no application-native replication. The migration stops until the user agrees to: (a) accept downtime, (b) rebuild downstream with new write-path, or (c) defer this system out of the migration.
Common pitfalls
- Egress during co-existence routinely runs 5–10× the unbudgeted estimate. Model it explicitly per-workload at assessment time and monitor near-real-time during execution. See LFF-01.
- Cross-cloud bulk transfer over open internet bottlenecks at default Linux TCP buffers. Tune
net.ipv4.tcp_{r,w}membefore measuring throughput; otherwise you'll mis-time the cutover window. See LFF-11. - Cloud SQL connection methods. Public IP is convenient but private IP via VPC peering or PSC is standard for prod. Use Cloud SQL Auth Proxy sidecar or Workload Identity-aware connector.
References
- Canonical sources: reference/sources.md.
- Database Migration Service overview.
- Storage Transfer Service.
- storage-translation — provides StorageClass, in-cluster volume strategies.
- traffic-cutover — sequences workload + data cutovers.
- rollback-playbook — gates failing during data migration cutover.
- docs/glossary.md — service map.