Ios runtime forensics workflow

iOS Runtime Forensics Workflow

Purpose

Provide two explicit evidence modes for a reproducible iOS Simulator issue: performance-trace for focused ETTrace/symbolicated latency or CPU work, and memory-graph for retained-object and leak ownership analysis. This skill owns evidence shape, not normal app build, launch, or UI driving.

When To Use

• Use performance-trace for launch/runtime latency, CPU-heavy stacks, or comparison traces.
• Use memory-graph for leaks, retain cycles, memory growth, or objects that should release after a known interaction.
• Route simulator discovery, build, install, launch, logs, screenshots, and UI driving to xcode-build-run-workflow.

Single-Path Workflow

1. Apply the Apple docs gate through explore-apple-swift-docs. Confirm the current Xcode/Simulator evidence mechanism before acting.
2. Define one reproduction, start/stop boundary, target app build, simulator UDID, OS, Xcode version, and expected release or latency behavior.
3. Select exactly one mode: performance-trace or memory-graph. Do not mix CPU and ownership conclusions in one unsupported capture.
4. For performance-trace, read references/performance-trace-evidence.md, capture a focused trace with matching symbols, and identify hot stacks only after symbolication.
5. For memory-graph, read references/memory-graph-evidence.md, drive the release-producing flow, capture a memgraph, inspect app-owned retained types, and follow ownership evidence to the retaining path.
6. Make the smallest root-cause change, then recapture the same flow on the same simulator where practical.
7. Report the exact capture boundary, tool/version context, what the artifact proves, what it does not prove, and the before/after delta.

Inputs

• reproducible simulator flow, target app/scheme, simulator UDID, and build configuration
• expected release/lifetime or performance boundary
• mode: performance-trace or memory-graph
• existing trace, memgraph, logs, screenshots, or symbol files when available

Outputs

• capture plan or artifact evidence with its scope and limitations
• app-owned hot stack or retaining ownership path when evidence supports it
• smallest remediation and same-flow recapture result

Guards and Stop Conditions

• Do not call a memory graph a leak proof until the expected lifetime and retaining path are established.
• Do not compare traces with different app builds, simulator/OS state, or workload boundaries as a regression result.
• Do not claim a symbolicated root cause from an unsymbolicated stack.
• Stop when the issue cannot be reproduced or a capture would include user-sensitive content without explicit approval.

Fallbacks and Handoffs

• Recommend xcode-build-run-workflow for all normal simulator execution and log/UI evidence.
• Recommend xcode-testing-workflow for Instruments, xctrace, test plans, and broader Xcode performance work.
• Recommend swiftui-performance-audit when the user first needs a code-first SwiftUI hypothesis.

Customization

Use references/customization-flow.md. Evidence mode and reproducibility requirements are fixed; local customization cannot bypass same-flow comparison or artifact-scope reporting.

References

• references/performance-trace-evidence.md
• references/memory-graph-evidence.md
• references/customization-flow.md
• Recommend references/snippets/apple-xcode-project-core.md when the app needs reusable Xcode-project policy alongside simulator evidence work.