agentsclimarketplace

Quality gate

Skill Felpix-Studios/social-science-research/skills/quality-gate

Verify every quantitative claim in the paper traces to an analysis output file, and no important output was omitted. Use when checking the paper matches the analysis before submission.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add Felpix-Studios/social-science-research --skill quality-gate

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Quality Gate: Paper ↔ Analysis Consistency

Cross-check every numerical claim in the paper against analysis output files. Reports only — never edits.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — path to the paper draft, or leave blank to auto-detect.

Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/quality-gates.md before assigning the final verdict and severity.

Step 1: Locate the Paper Draft

If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use that path. Otherwise glob for:

  • manuscripts/**/*.tex
  • manuscripts/**/*.qmd
  • manuscripts/**/*.md

If multiple drafts found, use AskUserQuestion to let the user pick:

  • header: "Paper"
  • question: "Multiple drafts found. Which manuscript should I check?"
  • options: list up to 4 found files (label: filename, description: path and file size). If more than 4, group by directory.

Step 2: Extract Numerical Claims

Read the full manuscript and extract every quantitative claim:

  • Coefficients and standard errors — e.g., "The effect is 0.23 (SE = 0.04)"
  • Sample sizes — e.g., "N = 4,521 observations"
  • Percentages and proportions — e.g., "42% of firms..."
  • Means, medians, ranges — e.g., "average income of $45,000"
  • Table and figure references — e.g., "Table 2 shows...", "as seen in Figure 1"
  • p-values and significance statements — e.g., "statistically significant at the 1% level"

Record location (section, paragraph, line number if available) for each claim.

Step 3: Inventory Output Files

Glob for all output files:

  • output/tables/**/*.tex — regression and summary tables
  • output/tables/**/*.html — HTML versions
  • output/figures/**/*.pdf, output/figures/**/*.png — figures
  • output/**/*.rds, output/**/*.pkl, output/**/*.parquet, output/**/*.csv — saved objects

Build an inventory with file paths and sizes.

Step 4: Dispatch Verifier Agent

Dispatch the verifier agent via Task to perform the heavy verification work. Pass it:

  • The full list of numerical claims extracted in Step 2 (with locations)
  • The output file inventory from Step 3
  • The paper draft path
  • The bibliography file path
Task prompt: "You are the verifier agent. Paper draft: [path].
Bibliography: [bib path].

CLAIMS TO VERIFY:
[paste the full claims list from Step 2]

OUTPUT FILE INVENTORY:
[paste the inventory from Step 3]

Verify each claim against the output files. Then do a reverse check —
find output files NOT referenced in the paper. Then check all citation
keys against the bibliography. Follow the verifier agent instructions
and return your full verification report."

After the verifier completes, collect its results:

  • Claim verification table (MATCHED / UNVERIFIED / MISSING FILE per claim)
  • Unreferenced output files list
  • Missing citation keys

Step 5: Save Report

Save to quality_reports/quality_gate_[YYYY-MM-DD]_[paper-name].md:

# Quality Gate Report: [Paper Name]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Paper:** [file path]

## Verdict: PASS / CONDITIONAL PASS / FAIL

PASS = all claims matched, no missing citations, no unexplained unreferenced outputs
CONDITIONAL PASS = minor unverified claims or informational unreferenced outputs
FAIL = unverified critical claims or missing citations


## Claim Verification

| Claim | Location | Found in Output? | Source File | Status |
|-------|----------|-----------------|-------------|--------|
| β = 0.23 (SE = 0.04) | Section 4, para 2 | Yes | output/tables/main_regs.tex | MATCHED |
| N = 4,521 | Table 2 note | Yes | output/tables/main_regs.tex | MATCHED |
| 42% of firms | Intro, para 1 | No | — | UNVERIFIED |


## Unreferenced Outputs

Files in output/ not referenced in the paper:

| File | Size | Recommended Action |
|------|------|-------------------|
| output/tables/robustness_het.tex | 4.2 KB | Reference in Section 7 or explain exclusion |


## Missing Citations

| Key | Used At | Status |
|-----|---------|--------|
| SmithJones2021 | Section 3, para 1 | NOT IN BIBLIOGRAPHY — CRITICAL |


## Summary

- Claims verified: N / M total
- Claims unverified: K (see table above)
- Unreferenced outputs: J
- Missing citations: L

## Recommended Actions (Priority Order)
1. [BLOCKING] ...
2. [RECOMMENDED] ...

Key Rules

  • Report only — never edit. All fixes are the user's responsibility after reviewing the report.
  • Tolerance: For inline numbers, a claim is MATCHED if the value appears in any output file within reasonable display rounding (±0.005 for 2-decimal numbers).
  • False positives are OK. Flag uncertainties as UNVERIFIED rather than guessing MATCHED.
  • Missing files are always BLOCKING — a figure reference pointing to a non-existent file is a FAIL.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 627,801. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.