Data analysis
Skill Felpix-Studios/social-science-research/skills/data-analysis
End-to-end data analysis in R or Python — exploration through regression to publication-ready tables and figures. Use when running empirical analysis, writing analysis code, or producing output from data.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add Felpix-Studios/social-science-research --skill data-analysisAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
7.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Data Analysis Workflow
Run an end-to-end data analysis in R or Python: load, explore, analyze, and produce publication-ready output.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — a dataset path (e.g., data/county_panel.csv) or a description of the analysis goal (e.g., "regress wages on education with state fixed effects using CPS data").
Before making analysis changes, read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/orchestrator-protocol.md, ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/analysis-verification.md, and ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/quality-gates.md; for replication or extension requests, also read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/replication-protocol.md.
Phase 0: Choose Language
R is the default. If ambiguous, use AskUserQuestion to pick R (Recommended — tidyverse/fixest/ggplot2, full plugin support including r-reviewer) or Python (pandas/statsmodels). Pick R when the project has existing .R code; Python when it has existing .py or .ipynb.
Phase 0.5: Ingest Non-Tabular Inputs
If $ARGUMENTS points to a PDF, HTML page, government portal URL, or other non-tabular source, Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/data-analysis/references/ingest-recipes.md and follow it before Phase 1. Skip this phase for flat files (.csv, .parquet, .dta, .rds, .feather, .json).
R Track
Constraints
- Follow
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/r-code-conventions.mdfor all standards - Save scripts to
scripts/R/with descriptive names - Save all outputs (figures, tables, RDS) to
output/ - Use
saveRDS()for every computed object - Run
r-revieweron the generated script before presenting results
Phase 1: Setup and Data Loading
- Create R script with proper header (title, author, purpose, inputs, outputs) — Read
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/data-analysis/assets/analysis-script.Rand adapt - Load required packages at top (
library(), neverrequire()) - Set seed once at top:
set.seed(42) - Create output directories:
dir.create("output/analysis", recursive = TRUE, showWarnings = FALSE) - Load and inspect the dataset
Phase 2: Exploratory Data Analysis
summary(), missingness rates, variable types- Histograms for key continuous variables
- Scatter plots, correlation matrices
- Panel trends, pre-treatment comparisons if applicable
- Save all diagnostic figures to
output/diagnostics/
Phase 3: Main Analysis
- Panel data: use
fixest; cross-section: uselm/glm - Cluster SEs at the appropriate level (document why)
- Multiple specifications: start simple, progressively add controls
- Report standardized effects alongside raw coefficients
Phase 3.5: Identification Diagnostics
Mandatory for any analysis with a causal interpretation. Detect the design from the analysis goal and the model call (feols(... | id + t) with treatment-timing → DiD; rdrobust → RDD; feols(y ~ ... | 0 | endog ~ instr) → IV; tidysynth → synthetic control; random assignment → RCT; MatchIt/cobalt → matching). Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/data-analysis/references/identification-r.md and run the block matching the detected design. Ask once with AskUserQuestion only if the design is genuinely ambiguous. Skip this phase for purely descriptive analyses.
Phase 4: Publication-Ready Output
Tables: modelsummary (preferred) or stargazer — export .tex and .html
Figures: ggplot2 with project theme; explicit ggsave(width = X, height = Y); save as .pdf and .png; add bg = "transparent" only if output is for Beamer slides
Phase 5: Save and Review
saveRDS()for all key objects- Dispatch the
r-revieweragent via Task:Task prompt: "Review the R script at scripts/R/[script_name].R against ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/rules/r-code-conventions.md. Save your report to quality_reports/[script_name]_r_review.md. Follow the r-reviewer agent instructions." - Address Critical and High issues before presenting results
Python Track
Constraints
- Save scripts to
scripts/python/with descriptive names - Save all outputs (figures, tables, pickles) to
output/ - Use
joblib.dump()for model objects;.to_parquet()for DataFrames - Use
pathlib.Pathfor all file paths — never hardcode absolute paths - Set random seeds at the top of the script
Phase 1: Setup and Data Loading
- Create Python script with header — Read
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/data-analysis/assets/analysis-script.pyand adapt - Import all packages at the top of the file
- Set seeds:
np.random.seed(42)andrandom.seed(42) - Create output directories:
Path("output/analysis").mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) - Load and inspect the dataset with
pandas
Phase 2: Exploratory Data Analysis
df.describe(),df.isnull().sum(),df.dtypes- Histograms and distributions with
matplotlib/seaborn - Scatter plots and correlation matrices
- Save diagnostic figures to
output/diagnostics/ - Save summary stats:
df.describe().to_csv("output/diagnostics/summary_stats.csv")
Phase 3: Main Analysis
- Cross-section OLS:
smf.ols("y ~ x", data=df).fit(cov_type="HC3") - Panel data:
PanelOLSfromlinearmodelswith cluster-robust SEs - Multiple specifications: build incrementally
- Document SE choice with a comment
Phase 3.5: Identification Diagnostics
Mandatory for any analysis with a causal interpretation. Detect the design from the analysis goal and the model call (PanelOLS(..., entity_effects=True, time_effects=True) with treatment timing → DiD; rdrobust port → RDD; IV2SLS → IV; pysyncon → synthetic control; experiment → RCT; causalinference → matching). Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/data-analysis/references/identification-py.md and run the block matching the detected design. Skip this phase for purely descriptive analyses.
Phase 4: Publication-Ready Output
Tables: Format with pandas and export via .to_latex() or stargazer (Python port)
Figures: matplotlib/seaborn; explicit fig.savefig(path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight"); save as .pdf and .png
Phase 5: Save and Review
joblib.dump(model, "output/model.pkl")for fitted modelsdf_results.to_parquet("output/results.parquet")for DataFrames- Review manually against the checklist below before presenting
Python Quality Checklist
[ ] All imports at top
[ ] Random seeds set (numpy + stdlib)
[ ] All paths use pathlib.Path — no hardcoded strings
[ ] Output directories created with mkdir(exist_ok=True)
[ ] Figures saved with explicit dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight"
[ ] Model objects saved with joblib.dump()
[ ] DataFrames saved as parquet
[ ] Comments explain WHY, not WHAT
Shared Principles
- Reproduce, don't guess. If the user specifies a regression, run exactly that.
- Show your work. Compute summary statistics before jumping to regression.
- Check for issues. Look for multicollinearity, outliers, perfect prediction, missing data.
- Use relative paths. All paths relative to repository root.
- No hardcoded values. Use variables for sample restrictions, date ranges, thresholds.