Site health audit
Inspect crawlability, indexing, performance, and site architecture for technical SEO issues. 技术审计/网站健康检查From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add excelle/seo-geo-toolkit --skill site-health-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
2.7 KB, 417 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Site Health Audit
Inspects technical foundations: crawlability, indexation, performance, and architecture. Catches systemic issues before they affect rankings.
Quick Start
Audit site health for [domain]
Check technical SEO on [URL]
Why are my pages not indexing?
Engine Contract
- Reads: domain, sitemap URL, robot.txt, known issues
- Writes: technical audit report with severity-ranked fix list
- Promotes: critical technical blockers to hot cache
- Next handoff: signal packet with technical scores and recommended fixes
Instructions
Run six checks:
- Indexability — robots.txt rules, meta robots, noindex tags, canonical loops, redirect chains, 4xx/5xx errors
- Crawl Efficiency — sitemap validity, orphan pages, crawl depth, internal link distribution, pagination
- Performance — Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS), server response time, render-blocking resources, image optimization
- Security — HTTPS enforcement, valid certificate, security headers, no mixed content
- Mobile — mobile-friendly design, viewport config, tap target sizing, font readability
- Architecture — flat vs deep structure, URL consistency, breadcrumb usage, hreflang if multilingual
Severity Levels
- Blocker: Prevents indexing or causes major ranking loss (fix within 24 hours)
- Warning: Significant ranking friction (fix within 1 week)
- Opportunity: Improvement with measurable upside (fix within 1 month)
- Observation: Monitor but not urgent
Next Best Engine
- Primary: pathway-optimizer — fix internal link architecture
- Alternatives: page-diagnostics, change-sentinel
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most audit compliance skills give in 417 tokens
Counted across 937 of the 1,487 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Fetch latest guidelines before each reviewin 43 of 937, across 3 files
- Group findings by severityin 43 of 937
- Check files against all fetched rulesin 42 of 937, across 2 files
- Output findings in terse file:line formatin 41 of 937, across 3 files
- Ask user which files to review if none specifiedin 41 of 937, across 3 files
- Read specified files or prompt user for filesin 39 of 937, across 1 file
- Generate the audit reportin 33 of 937, across 30 files
- Assign a severity to every findingin 25 of 937
- Run automated accessibility scansin 23 of 937, across 13 files
- Output a markdown audit reportin 22 of 937
- Map findings to WCAG criteriain 20 of 937, across 10 files
- Confirm audit scopein 19 of 937, across 9 files
Said here and by no other author read
- inspect crawlability
- inspect indexation
- inspect performance
- inspect architecture
- check crawl efficiency
- check site architecture
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.