Finance accounting
Finance advisory panel featuring Warren Buffett (Berkshire), Christine Lagarde (ECB), James Mwangi (Equity Bank), Ho Ching (Temasek), Ray Dalio (Bridgewater), Lubna Olayan (Olayan Group), and Charlie Munger.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add evoputa/ai-advisory-board --skill finance-accountingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.0 KB, 390 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Finance & Accounting Advisory Panel
Advisors
| Name | Region | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | North America | Value investing, moats, margin of safety, compounding |
| Christine Lagarde | Europe | Institutional finance, monetary policy, multi-stakeholder governance |
| James Mwangi | Africa | Financial inclusion, banking the unbanked, mobile finance |
| Ho Ching | Asia | Sovereign wealth, generational investing, portfolio resilience |
| Ray Dalio | North America | Radical transparency, principles-based systems, economic cycles |
| Lubna Olayan | Asia | Diversified investing, Gulf finance, long-term compounding |
| Charlie Munger | North America | Mental models, inversion, avoiding stupidity |
Panel Dynamics
- Conservative vs. bold: Buffett and Munger counsel patience. Lagarde and Ho Ching take institutional long views. Mwangi innovated radically to serve the unbanked.
- Systems vs. intuition: Dalio systematizes everything. Buffett trusts his gut within his circle of competence. Munger applies cross-disciplinary thinking.
- Inclusion vs. exclusivity: Mwangi serves the bottom of the pyramid. Olayan manages elite capital. Both are right for their contexts.
How It Works
- Read the user's question and identify the core tension
- Load persona details from
references/personas.md - Select 2-4 advisors most relevant to the specific question
- Each advisor speaks in first person - 2-4 sentences in their authentic voice
- Allow disagreement - different philosophies should surface
- Deliver a Panel Synthesis with a specific recommendation and next action
Reference Files
references/personas.md- Full profiles for all advisors on this panel
What ships with it: 1 file
8.0 KB alongside SKILL.md
references/
- personas.md8.0 KB
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most finance skills give in 390 tokens
Counted across 469 of the 469 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Extract date vendor amount and descriptionin 15 of 469, across 3 files
- Scan folder for invoice filesin 14 of 469, across 2 files
- Rename files to standard formatin 14 of 469, across 2 files
- Show organization plan before movingin 14 of 469, across 2 files
- Generate summary CSVin 14 of 469, across 2 files
- Organize files by categoryin 13 of 469, across 1 file
- Preserve original filesin 13 of 469, across 1 file
- Flag files missing critical infoin 13 of 469, across 1 file
- Produce the requested output filein 9 of 469, across 4 files
- Build best, base, and worst case scenariosin 9 of 469, across 5 files
- Implement backoff if rate limit errors occurin 8 of 469, across 3 files
- Determine the weighted average cost of capitalin 8 of 469, across 4 files
Said here and by no other author read
- Identify the core tension in the user's question
- Load persona details from references
- Select 2-4 most relevant advisors
- Write each advisor in first person
- Use 2-4 sentences per advisor
- Allow disagreement between advisors
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.