agentsclimarketplace

Marketing data quality audit

Skill duandigi/duandigi-growth-marketing-skill/skills/marketing-data-quality-audit

Use this skill when auditing whether marketing, analytics, CRM, revenue, conversion, or experiment data is complete, consistent, timely, deduplicated, comparable, and fit for a specific decision.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add duandigi/duandigi-growth-marketing-skill --skill marketing-data-quality-audit

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 29 days oldThe repository was created 29 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

3.5 KB, 571 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Marketing Data Quality Audit

Purpose

Establish whether available data can support descriptive reporting, diagnosis, attribution, forecasting, or causal claims before AI evaluation begins.

Inputs

  • Raw or normalized records and source metadata
  • Metric definitions, event taxonomy, attribution windows, and conversion rules
  • Expected data ranges, grain, time zone, and currency
  • Known tracking changes, migrations, outages, and consent effects

If a required input is unavailable, label it unknown, state how it limits the decision, and create a collection, mapping, validation, or instrumentation task. Never invent credentials, assets, metrics, permissions, or business outcomes.

Workflow

  1. State the decision the data is expected to support.
  2. Check schema validity, required fields, types, duplicate keys, null rates, and impossible values.
  3. Check completeness by provider, project, channel, asset, date, device, and conversion stage.
  4. Reconcile totals across source systems without assuming they should match exactly.
  5. Identify definition, attribution, time-zone, currency, and identity-resolution conflicts.
  6. Score fitness for reporting, diagnosis, attribution, experiment analysis, and automated action separately.
  7. Create instrumentation or repair tasks for critical gaps.

Required output

Return a concise, decision-oriented result containing:

  • Data-quality score with confidence and decision fitness
  • Critical, major, and minor issues
  • Reconciliation table and expected discrepancies
  • Affected reports, scores, and automated actions
  • Repair, validation, and monitoring plan

Label material statements as confirmed, calculated, inferred, assumed, or unknown. Include the data period, last complete period, source lineage, and confidence whenever they can change the decision.

Guardrails

  • Do not silently fill missing observations with zero.

  • Do not compare metrics with different definitions, windows, currencies, or grains without normalization.

  • Do not infer revenue quality from platform conversion counts alone.

  • Do not approve automated optimization when critical conversion or spend data is unreliable.

  • Do not claim guaranteed growth or present an estimate as observed fact.

  • Do not reveal secrets, personal data, private provider payloads, or cross-project information.

  • When an action can spend money, publish, contact people, alter access, modify production, or delete data, prepare an approval request instead of executing automatically.

Completion check

Before finishing, verify that the output:

  • answers a specific business or implementation decision;
  • uses the correct organization, project, asset, date range, time zone, and currency;
  • separates performance problems from data, connection, and attribution problems;
  • includes evidence, uncertainty, affected scope, and a measurable next step;
  • respects least privilege, approval, audit, and rollback requirements;
  • is no longer than necessary for the decision.

What ships with it: 1 file

900 B alongside SKILL.md

evals/

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,851. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.