Channel performance audit
Skill duandigi/duandigi-growth-marketing-skill/skills/channel-performance-audit
Evidence-first AI Agent Skills for growth marketing — multi-channel analytics (SEO, paid media, social, local search, CRM), secure account integration, AI evaluation, experimentation & approval-safe optimization for Claude Code.
npx -y skills add duandigi/duandigi-growth-marketing-skill --skill channel-performance-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 25 days oldThe repository was created 25 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use this skill when auditing one marketing channel from account summary down to campaigns, content, audiences, queries, landing pages, conversions, qualified outcomes, revenue, and operational constraints.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
3.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Channel Performance Audit
Purpose
Apply a consistent channel-audit frame while preserving the provider-specific metrics, mechanisms, and limitations of the selected channel.
Inputs
- Channel objective, owner, budget, and target audience
- Provider, analytics, CRM, revenue, and landing-page data
- Campaign, content, asset, query, audience, device, location, and time dimensions
- Historical changes, experiments, and channel constraints
If a required input is unavailable, label it unknown, state how it limits the decision, and create a collection, mapping, validation, or instrumentation task. Never invent credentials, assets, metrics, permissions, or business outcomes.
Workflow
- Define the channel job: demand creation, demand capture, activation, retention, referral, or revenue support.
- Validate data health, attribution boundaries, and the last complete period.
- Review channel totals, trend, mix, efficiency, quality, and downstream business outcomes.
- Drill down to the smallest actionable object supported by the data.
- Identify winners, losers, concentration risk, saturation, decay, tracking gaps, and landing-page mismatch.
- Compare channel performance against its own objective and constraints, not a universal benchmark.
- Return prioritized actions and experiments with expected mechanism and approval level.
Required output
Return a concise, decision-oriented result containing:
- Channel role and health summary
- Top-level and drill-down findings
- Efficiency, quality, and downstream outcome analysis
- Data and attribution limitations
- Prioritized actions, experiments, and stop rules
Label material statements as confirmed, calculated, inferred, assumed, or unknown. Include the data period, last complete period, source lineage, and confidence whenever they can change the decision.
Guardrails
-
Do not judge every channel by last-click revenue alone.
-
Do not use generic industry benchmarks as proof that performance is good or bad.
-
Do not optimize top-of-funnel metrics while ignoring lead quality, retention, or margin.
-
Do not recommend write actions without an approval plan.
-
Do not claim guaranteed growth or present an estimate as observed fact.
-
Do not reveal secrets, personal data, private provider payloads, or cross-project information.
-
When an action can spend money, publish, contact people, alter access, modify production, or delete data, prepare an approval request instead of executing automatically.
Completion check
Before finishing, verify that the output:
- answers a specific business or implementation decision;
- uses the correct organization, project, asset, date range, time zone, and currency;
- separates performance problems from data, connection, and attribution problems;
- includes evidence, uncertainty, affected scope, and a measurable next step;
- respects least privilege, approval, audit, and rollback requirements;
- is no longer than necessary for the decision.