Postmortem writer
Skill Dokkabei97/forged-claude-code/skills/coo/postmortem-writer
Generates blame-free postmortem documents for incidents and failures. Includes timeline, root cause analysis, and prevention measures following the blameless postmortem culture.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add Dokkabei97/forged-claude-code --skill postmortem-writerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Postmortem Writer - Blameless Incident Review
Overview
Documents failures so the team learns and the same mistake never happens twice. Blame people → they hide mistakes. Fix systems → they prevent mistakes.
1. When to Apply
| Trigger | Behavior |
|---|---|
| Production incident resolved | Full postmortem template |
| Project/launch failure | Project postmortem |
| "postmortem", "RCA" | Interactive postmortem builder |
2. Postmortem Template
# Postmortem: [Incident Title]
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Date** | YYYY-MM-DD |
| **Severity** | P0 (Critical) / P1 (Major) / P2 (Minor) |
| **Duration** | [Start time] → [Resolution time] ([N] hours) |
| **Impact** | [Users affected, revenue lost, SLA breached] |
| **Author** | [Name] |
| **Reviewers** | [Names] |
| **Status** | Draft / Reviewed / Action Items Complete |
---
## Summary
[2-3 sentences: what happened, impact, how it was resolved]
## Timeline (All times in KST/UTC)
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| HH:MM | [First sign of issue] |
| HH:MM | [Alert triggered / User report] |
| HH:MM | [Investigation started by @name] |
| HH:MM | [Root cause identified] |
| HH:MM | [Fix deployed] |
| HH:MM | [Service fully restored] |
## Root Cause Analysis
### What Happened
[Detailed technical explanation of the failure chain]
### 5 Whys
1. **Why** did the service go down? → [Answer]
2. **Why** did that happen? → [Answer]
3. **Why** did that happen? → [Answer]
4. **Why** did that happen? → [Answer]
5. **Why** did that happen? → [Root cause]
### Contributing Factors
- [Factor 1 — not the root cause but made it worse]
- [Factor 2]
## What Went Well
- [Quick detection / response]
- [Effective communication]
- [Rollback worked as designed]
## What Went Poorly
- [Delayed detection]
- [Missing runbook]
- [Communication gaps]
## Action Items
| # | Action | Owner | Priority | Due | Status |
|---|--------|-------|----------|-----|--------|
| 1 | [Prevention measure] | @name | P0 | [date] | ⬜ |
| 2 | [Detection improvement] | @name | P1 | [date] | ⬜ |
| 3 | [Process change] | @name | P2 | [date] | ⬜ |
## Lessons Learned
- [Key insight for the team]
---
*This is a blameless postmortem. We focus on systems, not individuals.*
3. Blameless Culture Rules
- No "who" — focus on "what" and "how"
- Assume good intent — people made the best decision with available info
- Fix systems — humans will always make mistakes; design systems that catch them
- Share openly — postmortems are learning opportunities, not punishments
- Follow through — track action items to completion
4. Tool Coordination
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Write | Generate postmortem documents |
| Read | Reference previous incidents, runbooks |
5. Boundaries
Will:
- Generate structured postmortem documents
- Guide root cause analysis (5 Whys)
- Enforce blameless language
- Track action items from incidents
Will Not:
- Investigate actual production incidents
- Access logs, metrics, or monitoring systems
- Assign blame to individuals
- Replace real-time incident response (use runbook for that)