agentsclimarketplace

Fr plan

Skill derio-net/super-fr/plugins/super-fr/skills/fr-plan

Write phase-structured plans with operator collaboration. Use when: "write a plan", "fr plan", "create a plan". Invoked by brainstorming handoff.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add derio-net/super-fr --skill fr-plan

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.8 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

fr-plan

Produce implementation plans through collaborative dialogue. Conversational parts stay here; mechanical parts delegate to the fr plan CLI.

Announce at start: "I'm using fr-plan to create the implementation plan."

Format (v2 plan-as-folder)

A plan is a directory under docs/superpowers/plans/<slug>/ containing:

  • _meta.yaml — schema_version, plan slug, spec ref, target_repo, vk_version, created date, optional rework metadata (parent_plan, prior_rework, origin_items).
    • spec ref notation: a same-repo spec is a plain repo-relative path (docs/superpowers/specs/<file>.md). A spec that lives in another repo MUST use the cross-repo form <owner>/<repo>:<path-in-that-repo> (e.g. derio-net/frank:docs/superpowers/specs/<file>.md). Without the owner/repo: prefix, fr apply's reachability gate treats it as a missing same-repo file and refuses to dispatch. fr plan self-review warns when a same-repo-form spec doesn't resolve locally (#248).
  • _prose.md — the human-readable narrative. Tooling never parses this; it's for humans (and the implementing agent).
  • NN.yaml (one file per phase, two-digit zero-padded: 01.yaml, 02.yaml, …, 99.yaml) — phase header, tasks, steps, and per-step state. Per-phase files prevent merge conflicts when parallel branches tick different phases. Phases are numbered from 1: 01.yaml is the first phase; 00.yaml (phase 0) fails parse — fr plan create rejects it pre-flight.

Every step id follows P<n>.T<n>.S<n> (phase number, task number, step number). The renderer / observer / diff / apply chain depends on this shape.

Procedure

  1. Read context (recent commits, existing plans, spec file).
  2. Confirm scope. Decompose if too large.
  3. Propose 2-3 approaches with tradeoffs. Recommend one.
  4. Present plan structure section by section, get approval.
  5. Scaffold the plan folder:
    fr plan create --slug <YYYY-MM-DD-slug> --target-repo <owner/repo> \
        --spec docs/superpowers/specs/<spec-file>.md \
        --phases-file <phases.yaml> \
        --prose-file <prose.md>
    
    fr plan create ALSO appends a row to the spec's ## Implementation Plans table — there is no separate spec-index step.
  6. Iterate on the prose / per-phase yaml via the Edit tool.
  7. Run self-review: fr plan self-review <plan-dir>.
  8. Hand off for execution:
    • fr apply <plan-dir> — render → observe → diff → preview (default dry-run). Add --yes to actually create / update GitHub Issues.
    • The implementing agent uses fr pickup <plan-dir> --phase N to receive the phase scope as markdown.

Rules

  • TDD (superpowers:test-driven-development): red → green → refactor. Test first (red → green), then an optional refactor step per task when there's duplication / naming / extraction to clean — stay green, add no behavior; skip it when there's nothing to clean. No speculative generality.
  • Refactor step shape (optional): after a task's red→green steps (P<n>.T<n>.S1 test, S2 implement), the default is a trailing optional refactor step (P<n>.T<n>.S3) for small cleanups; use a separate REFACTOR + quality gate task for larger ones. Omit it entirely when there's nothing to clean — trivial tasks carry no empty refactor step.
  • Pure agentic phases: an agentic phase must be fully agent-completable end-to-end. Collect ALL manual work (secrets, UI operations, deploy actions, cluster-dependent config) into a dedicated [manual] phase — never author a manual step into an agentic phase planning to defer it. fr plan self-review enforces this with error severity (#252).
  • Acceptance linkage: a phase that advances a matrix row carries acceptance: [row-ids] in its header. fr plan self-review errors when the spec has a Test Plan but zero linked rows (matrix present) and on unknown ids. Planning may ADD rows (fr acceptance add, origin = spec) when decomposition exposes a missed business acceptance — flagged as an addition, defended at PR time, never ironed over.
  • No placeholders: every step has actual code, commands, expected output.
  • Bite-sized steps: 2-5 minutes each.
  • Use BEGIN/END markers for full-file embeds, not nested fences.
  • Cross-repo completeness: If the spec lists multiple plans across repos, write ALL of them before offering the execution handoff. For each target repo: scaffold the plan in that repo's docs/superpowers/plans/ directory. fr plan create updates the spec table automatically.

Dependency declarations

Each per-phase yaml declares its blockers via phase.depends_on: [N, ...] (integers, comma-separated when multiple).

  • Root phases: depends_on: [].
  • Non-root phases: depends_on: [1, 2] for fan-in.
  • Deps are backward-only: phase N may only reference phases < N.
  • Cycles are caught by fr plan self-review.

Rework plans

After a parent plan ships, defer surfaced-but-unrealised items into a separate rework plan — do not reopen the parent.

  • fr plan rework <parent-plan-dir> scaffolds a sibling <parent-slug>-rework-N/ folder, adds parent_plan (and prior_rework if N>1) to its _meta.yaml, and appends a row to the spec table.
  • fr plan rework-add <rework-dir> --item ... --source ... --track ... appends an entry to _meta.origin_items. --track is free-form (canonical tokens development, operations, decision; compounds like decision → development accepted).
  • fr plan rework-list [--include-archived] surfaces open reworks.

Integration

Upstream: brainstorming hands off via fr-plan-override. Downstream: fr apply for GitHub-side work; executing-plans for the agent loop.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most plan spec skills give in ~1.5k tokens

Counted across 1,099 of the 1,860 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Ask one question at a timein 51 of 1099
  • Break plans into vertical slicesin 29 of 1099, across 11 files
  • Publish issues in dependency orderin 27 of 1099, across 9 files
  • Iterate until user approves the breakdownin 25 of 1099, across 7 files
  • Explore the repository to understand the codebase statein 24 of 1099, across 7 files
  • Use domain glossary vocabularyin 23 of 1099, across 5 files
  • Apply correct triage labels to published issuesin 23 of 1099, across 5 files
  • Prefer AFK slices over HITLin 22 of 1099, across 7 files
  • Write a specification before writing any codein 22 of 1099, across 14 files
  • Write failing tests before implementation codein 22 of 1099, across 20 files
  • Ask clarifying questions until requirements are concretein 21 of 1099, across 13 files
  • Respect existing architecture decision recordsin 20 of 1099, across 5 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • Present plan structure for approval
  • Scaffold the plan folder with fr plan create
  • Iterate on prose and phase yaml
  • Run plan self-review
  • Put all manual work in a dedicated manual phase
  • Link phases to acceptance matrix rows

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,834. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.