Fr acceptance
Claude Code plugin suite: superpowers-wrapped planning, devcontainer+worktree isolation, goal-to-PR autonomy, and phase dispatch to VibeKanban runners
npx -y skills add derio-net/super-fr --skill fr-acceptanceAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Drive the acceptance matrix: backfill an existing repo's business-level acceptance tests into docs/acceptance/matrix.yaml, flip row statuses as evidence lands, and keep the CI gate honest. Use when: "backfill the acceptance matrix", "acceptance debt", "add acceptance rows", a session starts with an acceptance-debt nag, or `fr acceptance check` fails.
SKILL.md
3.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
fr-acceptance
The matrix (docs/acceptance/matrix.yaml) is the registry of business-level
acceptance tests × verification levels (unit/api/int/ui) × automation status.
This skill drives the agent-side work; the mechanics live in the CLI.
Announce at start: "I'm using fr-acceptance to work the acceptance matrix."
Statuses — the honesty scale
ci / scheduled = automated, cannot drift · skipped = verification exists
but not in CI (warning, backfill owed) · not-implemented = nothing yet
(warning) · failing = known red, fr acceptance check exits 2 and CI fails.
Statuses move explicitly, never silently. The drift channel is precisely
the hand-tracked claims — when in doubt between ci and skipped, choose skipped.
Do not inflate coverage; the operator audits statuses at review.
Backfill an existing repo
fr acceptance init(idempotent) if the repo has no matrix — scaffolds matrix + CI workflow + backfill rule + gitignore entry.fr acceptance backfill— emits the inventory (Test Plan specs not yet cited, plans without linked rows, test-tree hints) + this protocol.- DRAFT rows — one row per business acceptance, not per test — via
fr acceptance add --id <kebab> --capability <group> --acceptance "<operator can X>" --origin <repo>:<path> --level unit=<repo>:<path> --status <honest> --notes "<evidence / backfill owed>". Never hand-edit YAML shapes;addvalidates and appends. fr acceptance check→ fix errors (unresolved refs, staleness, schema), re-run until only honest warnings remain.- Open a review PR: the operator audits every status.
Flip statuses (execution hand-off)
When a plan phase carrying acceptance: [row-ids] completes, flip those rows
up the ladder (not-implemented → skipped → ci/scheduled), citing the
test refs that justify the move in levels and notes. fr plan edit --complete-phase warns on unflipped rows — fix or record why in the
completion note.
Mid-flight additions (encouraged, then defended)
During planning or implementation, ADD a row the moment a legitimate business
need surfaces (a missed edge, a review-found failure mode, a constraint turned
load-bearing) — never silently widen or narrow scope. Every addition is
presented in the PR body ("rows added since brainstorm", generated via
fr acceptance check --added-since <base-ref>) with a one-line defense.
Refs and the gate
Refs are <repo>:<path>[#Lline|#anchor] — own repo by its own name, sibling
repos verified only where a checkout exists (--sibling-root, default ..).
Archived specs auto-resolve (specs/ ↔ implemented/specs/) — check warns,
never errors, on a moved ref. fr acceptance report renders the HTML;
fr acceptance status is the terminal nag; fr acceptance digest feeds the
weekly "Acceptance debt" issue upsert.