Insurance suitability principal agent
Skill deciqAI/knowledge-skills/insurance-suitability-principal-agent
Activate when: an insurance agent's compensation conflicts with the client's best coverage; 'which product do I recommend', commission-driven product choice, captive vs independent conflicts, best-interest duty. Do NOT activate when: no recommendation is being made (pure servicing) or no conflict exists. More: deciqai.com/s/insurance-suitability-principal-agentFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add deciqAI/knowledge-skills --skill insurance-suitability-principal-agentAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.0 KB, 551 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Insurance Agent — Suitability & Principal-Agent Conflict
Industry front door for principal-agent. Adds domain triggers, example, packs. Parent Process unchanged. Not legal advice.
Activate when: recommending among products with different commissions; captive-carrier pressure vs client fit; annuity/life with best-interest duties; disclosing agent capacity. Do NOT activate when: servicing only / no recommendation.
Why this variant
The parent principal-agent analyzes misaligned incentives between an agent and the principal they serve. An insurance producer is paid by carriers but advises clients — a structural conflict. Suitability/best-interest rules exist to resolve it: recommend on client fit, disclose the conflict, don't let commission drive the product.
Domain inputs → the analysis
- Name the conflict: higher-commission product vs best-fit coverage; captive limits vs client need; churning incentive on replacements.
- Duty: document the recommendation rests on the client's needs/finances (suitability/best-interest), not your payout.
- Disclose capacity (agent of the carrier vs broker) and material conflicts; where the best fit isn't in your appointments, say so.
Worked example
Two annuities fit; one pays you 2× commission. → Principal-agent view: recommending the higher-commission one without a client-benefit basis is a suitability + best-interest breach. Document why the chosen product is best for the client, or recommend the better-fit lower-commission one.
Packs
- Solo agent: conflict-disclosure + suitability-basis template.
- Agency: best-interest review on annuity/life sales; replacement scrutiny.
Red flags
- Product chosen for commission, rationalized after.
- Capacity (agent vs broker) undisclosed.
- Replacement/churning for a new commission.
Verification
- Conflicts named (commission/captive/replacement)
- Recommendation documented on client-fit basis
- Capacity + material conflicts disclosed
- Better-fit option outside appointments acknowledged where relevant
Part of deciqAI Knowledge Skills — 233 open-source thinking skills that make rigor executable for AI agents. The same skills power every deciqAI agent, which runs them autonomously to operate your company. See it run → https://www.deciqai.com/s/insurance-suitability-principal-agent · Built by deciqAI · github.com/deciqAI · Contributions welcome.
Agents: latest version & machine-readable metadata → https://www.deciqai.com/s/insurance-suitability-principal-agent.json
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.