Implement plan
Execute an implementation plan from flow/plans/ phase by phase, pausing for verification between phases. Explicit workflow command; run only when invoked via /implement-plan or explicitly asked, never autonomously.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add corticalstack/flow --skill implement-planAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
- runs commandsInstructs the agent to run 4 commands, including `tracker set-state <id> in-progress ready-for-dev` and 3 more.
SKILL.md
3.5 KB, 685 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Implement Plan
You are tasked with implementing an approved technical plan from flow/plans/. These plans contain phases with specific changes and success criteria.
Getting Started
When given a plan path:
- Read the plan completely and check for any existing checkmarks (- [x])
- Read the original ticket and all files mentioned in the plan
- Read files fully - never use limit/offset parameters, you need complete context
- Transition the work-item state (if an issue / work item is referenced in the plan):
tracker set-state <id> in-progress ready-for-dev - Think deeply about how the pieces fit together
- Create a todo list to track your progress
- Start implementing if you understand what needs to be done
If no plan path provided, ask for one.
Implementation Philosophy
Plans are carefully designed, but reality can be messy. Your job is to:
- Follow the plan's intent while adapting to what you find
- Implement each phase fully before moving to the next
- Verify your work makes sense in the broader codebase context
- Update checkboxes in the plan as you complete sections
When things don't match the plan exactly, think about why and communicate clearly. The plan is your guide, but your judgment matters too.
If you encounter a mismatch:
- STOP and think deeply about why the plan can't be followed
- Present the issue clearly:
Issue in Phase [N]: Expected: [what the plan says] Found: [actual situation] Why this matters: [explanation] How should I proceed?
Verification Approach
After implementing a phase:
- Run the success criteria checks listed in the plan (e.g.,
uv run pytest,make test,npm test) - Fix any issues before proceeding
- Update your progress in both the plan and your todos
- Check off completed items in the plan file itself using Edit
- Pause for human verification: After completing all automated verification for a phase, pause and inform the human that the phase is ready for manual testing. Use this format:
Phase [N] Complete - Ready for Manual Verification Automated verification passed: - [List automated checks that passed] Please perform the manual verification steps listed in the plan: - [List manual verification items from the plan] Let me know when manual testing is complete so I can proceed to Phase [N+1].
If instructed to execute multiple phases consecutively, skip the pause until the last phase. Otherwise, assume you are just doing one phase.
do not check off items in the manual testing steps until confirmed by the user.
If You Get Stuck
When something isn't working as expected:
- First, make sure you've read and understood all the relevant code
- Consider if the codebase has evolved since the plan was written
- Present the mismatch clearly and ask for guidance
Use sub-tasks sparingly - mainly for targeted debugging or exploring unfamiliar territory.
Resuming Work
If the plan has existing checkmarks:
- Trust that completed work is done
- Pick up from the first unchecked item
- Verify previous work only if something seems off
Remember: You're implementing a solution, not just checking boxes. Keep the end goal in mind and maintain forward momentum.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 1 of the 12 instructions most plan spec skills give in 685 tokens
Counted across 1,360 of the 2,617 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Ask one question at a timein 73 of 1360
- Write the spec using the templatein 22 of 1360
- Ask clarifying questions if neededin 19 of 1360, across 18 files
- Wait for user confirmation before proceedingin 19 of 1360
- Save plans to the plans directoryin 17 of 1360, across 13 files
- Check for product marketing context firstin 16 of 1360, across 5 files
- Read the plan file completelyhere, and in 16 of 1360
- Order tasks by dependencyin 16 of 1360
- Gather context from the conversationin 15 of 1360, across 9 files
- Explore the codebase instead of askingin 15 of 1360, across 13 files
- Wait for explicit user approvalin 14 of 1360, across 13 files
- Quiz the user on the breakdownin 13 of 1360, across 7 files
Said here and by no other author read
- Update checkboxes in the plan as you complete sections
- Pause for human verification after each phase
- Run success criteria checks after a phase
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.