Vendor security review
Skill ClarentCinematics/Codex-Skills-for-Enterprise/skills/vendor-security-review
Review vendor security questionnaires, procurement security notes, SOC2 summaries, DPA excerpts, subprocessor lists, security answer drafts, or risk-review packets for missing coverage, weak evidence, follow-up questions, and human-review risks. Use when Codex needs to prepare a vendor security review without making legal, compliance, or approval decisions.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add ClarentCinematics/Codex-Skills-for-Enterprise --skill vendor-security-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
- runs commandsInstructs the agent to run 1 command, including `scripts/check_vendor_security_answers.py --input <path>`.
SKILL.md
2.3 KB, 407 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Vendor Security Review
Workflow
- Identify vendor, product, data involved, intended use, review stage, and source documents.
- Check coverage for security, privacy, data handling, access control, auditability, and contractual evidence.
- Separate supplied evidence from vendor claims, assumptions, missing answers, and review questions.
- Flag gaps, weak answers, risks, and required human review.
- Produce a concise review packet for security, legal, procurement, or business owners.
Script-Assisted Workflow
When given a questionnaire or answer draft, run scripts/check_vendor_security_answers.py --input <path> first. Use --json for structured coverage output. The helper detects missing topic coverage and weak answers; it does not approve vendors or provide legal/security certification.
Output Standard
Use this structure by default:
- Review Summary: vendor, product, intended use, data sensitivity, and readiness.
- Coverage Check: SOC2, DPA, subprocessors, retention, breach notification, encryption, SSO, and audit logs.
- Evidence Gaps: missing or weak answers with source excerpts.
- Risk Questions: security, privacy, legal, procurement, and business-owner follow-ups.
- Recommended Next Steps: review actions and owners when stated.
- Human Review Required: approvals, exceptions, legal terms, or risk acceptance.
- Caveats: non-inferred approvals and source limitations.
Rules
- Do not approve vendors, accept risk, provide legal advice, or certify compliance.
- Do not invent SOC2 status, DPA terms, subprocessors, encryption controls, SSO support, or breach-notification terms.
- Mark missing answers as missing, not failed, unless the source explicitly says a control is absent.
- Treat customer, employee, health, financial, or regulated data as requiring human review.
References
Read references/vendor-security-rubric.md when preparing security, privacy, procurement, or legal follow-up questions.
What ships with it: 3 files
5.3 KB alongside SKILL.md, 1 of them executable
agents/
- openai.yaml268 B
references/
scripts/
- check_vendor_security_answers.pyruns4.2 KB