Support deflection miner
Skill ClarentCinematics/Codex-Skills-for-Enterprise/skills/support-deflection-miner
npx -y skills add ClarentCinematics/Codex-Skills-for-Enterprise --skill support-deflection-minerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Analyze support tickets, helpdesk exports, issue subjects, customer questions, or support thread summaries to find repeated themes, duplicate-looking requests, documentation gaps, automation candidates, and support-deflection opportunities. Use when Codex needs to convert support noise into prioritized KB, product, or workflow improvements without inventing customer facts.
SKILL.md
2.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Support Deflection Miner
Workflow
- Identify source type, date range, product area, customer segment, and support goal.
- Group repeated questions, symptoms, ticket subjects, and workaround requests.
- Separate documentation gaps, product friction, policy confusion, and automation opportunities.
- Prioritize by repetition, customer impact, confidence, and actionability.
- Produce proposed KB articles, product feedback, macros, automation candidates, and caveats.
Script-Assisted Workflow
When given ticket subjects in CSV or text form, run scripts/mine_support_themes.py --input <path> first. Use --json when structured theme counts are needed. The helper surfaces repeated text patterns; Codex must still judge whether a theme is a KB gap, product issue, or workflow candidate.
Output Standard
Use this structure by default:
- Deflection Summary: source scope, top repeated issues, and confidence.
- Top Themes: theme, evidence, count, likely category, and caveats.
- Duplicate-Looking Requests: repeated subjects or near-repeated issue language.
- KB Opportunities: proposed article titles, audience, source evidence, and missing facts.
- Product / Process Signals: friction points requiring product, policy, or workflow review.
- Automation Candidates: macro, bot, form, routing, or script opportunities.
- Questions To Resolve: missing context needed before publishing or automating.
Rules
- Do not invent customer names, ticket counts beyond the provided input, root causes, SLA impact, or product commitments.
- Mark keyword clusters as heuristic, not definitive taxonomy.
- Keep customer-sensitive data out of examples unless already sanitized.
- Prefer small, reviewable deflection actions over broad automation claims.
References
Read references/deflection-rubric.md when deciding whether a repeated support theme should become a KB article, product bug, macro, or automation candidate.