Ylj workflow
Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Yale-Law-Journal-Skills/skills/ylj-workflow
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ylj-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use as the entry point for any The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) piece. Routes to the right YLJ sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and which track (Article, Essay, Feature, student Note/Comment, or Forum) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
SKILL.md
5.2 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
YLJ Workflow Router (ylj-workflow)
The orchestrator for a Yale Law Journal submission. YLJ is a student-edited, generalist law review at Yale Law School — not peer-reviewed. Figure out the track and the stage, then send the user to the matching skill. Unlike a peer-reviewed journal, the piece must already read as a near-final, heavily-footnoted, Bluebook-compliant article when it is submitted, because student editors evaluate a finished manuscript and then cite-check every footnote.
When to trigger
- Starting a new piece for YLJ and unsure where to begin
- Mid-draft and unsure which skill applies next
- Deciding which track fits (Article / Essay / Feature / Note / Comment / Forum)
- Holding an offer from another review and weighing an expedite (route to
ylj-placement-strategy) - An offer landed and student editing is starting (route to
ylj-student-editor-review)
First question: which track?
| Situation | Track | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full original scholarship by a professional author | Article (encourage < 25,000 words incl. footnotes) | normal pipeline below |
| Shorter, more pointed professional piece | Essay (encourage < 15,000 words incl. footnotes) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |
| Curated multi-piece collection / symposium contribution | Feature | ylj-thesis-and-contribution + ylj-placement-strategy |
| Student-authored long-form scholarship (Yale Law student) | Note (first-time cap ~20,000 words) | ylj-student-editor-review (Notes Development) early |
| Student-authored short piece (Yale Law student) | Comment (first-time cap ~7,000 words) | ylj-student-editor-review early |
| Short, timely online response or essay | YLJ Forum (encourage < 10,000 words) | ylj-revision-and-editing (Forum path) |
Caps are the figures YLJ "strongly encourages"; over-length weighs against acceptance (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). Notes/Comments are written by Yale Law students; outside authors use Article/Essay/Feature/Forum.
Routing map (stage → skill)
Is the topic YLJ-worthy? → ylj-topic-selection
What exactly is the claim? → ylj-thesis-and-contribution
Has anyone said this already? → ylj-preemption-check
Does the argument hold? → ylj-argument-structure
Are the cites pinpointed/Bluebook?→ ylj-sources-and-bluebook
Does the prose read like YLJ? → ylj-writing-style
Where + when to submit/expedite? → ylj-placement-strategy
Working with student editors? → ylj-student-editor-review
Ready to upload? → ylj-submission
In the edit cycle / Forum? → ylj-revision-and-editing
Final footnote + cite-check? → ylj-footnotes-and-cite-check
Default order
topic-selection → thesis-and-contribution → preemption-check → argument-structure → sources-and-bluebook → writing-style → placement-strategy → submission → student-editor-review → revision-and-editing → footnotes-and-cite-check
Iterate: most pieces loop thesis ↔ preemption ↔ argument several times before the prose polish. The
footnote apparatus is built throughout, not bolted on at the end — ylj-footnotes-and-cite-check
runs both before submission and again during the editorial source-pull.
Generalist fit check (run before routing onward)
| Check | Pass condition | Route if weak |
|---|---|---|
| Audience | A generalist legal reader (not just your subfield) can state why the claim matters. | ylj-topic-selection |
| Novelty | The thesis is not preempted by an existing article, student note, or working paper. | ylj-preemption-check |
| Apparatus | Every assertion of law or fact is footnoted with a pinpoint Bluebook cite. | ylj-sources-and-bluebook |
| Posture | The piece is near-final — not a draft you plan to finish after acceptance. | ylj-writing-style |
Anti-patterns
- Treating YLJ like a peer-reviewed journal that will co-develop a rough draft — student editors evaluate a finished article
- Submitting before the footnote apparatus is complete and Bluebook-conforming
- Forgetting YLJ uses its own online submission system (not Scholastica/ExpressO) — see
ylj-submission - Assuming an expedite buys priority — at YLJ expedite gives no competitive advantage (see
ylj-placement-strategy) - Pitching a narrow doctrinal note as a generalist Article without a claim that travels
Output format
【Stage】topic / thesis / preemption / argument / cites / prose / placement / submit / editing / forum / cite-check
【Track】Article / Essay / Feature / Note / Comment / Forum
【Route to】ylj-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
Supplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— legal research databases + citation/Bluebook tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md— official YLJ URLs behind every fact in this pack
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.