agentsclimarketplace

Aaag submission

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-submission

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-submission

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection, double-anonymous preparation, the 11,000-word inclusive cap, Chicago style, keywords, ORCID, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

SKILL.md

6.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Submission Preflight (aaag-submission)

The last check before pressing submit on ScholarOne Manuscripts. The Annals is double-anonymous and caps almost everything against the word limit, so the two most common avoidable failures are an under-anonymized manuscript and an over-length one. Verify volatile specifics on the official pages before relying on them (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
  • Unsure which files/metadata ScholarOne expects, or which area/type to pick
  • Confirming the chosen type's cap is met and the manuscript is properly anonymized

Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)

  • Owner / publisher: American Association of Geographers (AAG) / Taylor & Francis (Routledge).
  • Portal: ScholarOne Manuscripts (via the Taylor & Francis journal page).
  • Review model: double-anonymous for Articles, Special Issues, Forums, and Commentaries — by one to three referees, one of which is the editor or a designate. Commentary Responses get single-anonymous review. Anonymize the manuscript; provide a separate title page.
  • Areas (four + a cross-track): declare one — Geographic Methods; Human Geography; Nature and Society; Physical Geography, Earth, and Environmental Sciences — plus a General Geography / cross-disciplinary track. A subject editor leads each area (plus a Cartography Editor), all on four-year terms; your area routes the manuscript. Current area editors (verified 2026-06-22 via AAG announcements): Human Geography — Paul Adams (since Jan 2024); Nature and Society — Brian King (since Jan 2024); General Geography / cross-discipline — Rachel Franklin (since Jan 2025); Physical Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences — Michaela Buenemann (since Jan 2025); Geographic Methods — Anthony Howell (since Jan 2026). Re-confirm on the AAG page, as terms rotate.
  • Article types & caps: Article (regular) ≤ 11,000 words (incl. abstract, references, notes, tables, figure captions); Forum intro 2,500 + papers 5,000 each, ≤ 25,000 total; Commentary < 2,000 incl. references; Special-Issue papers ~5,000 words. (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准)
  • Style: Chicago Manual of Style, author-date; abstract + 3-5 italicized, alphabetized keywords.
  • ORCID: provide for authors (Taylor & Francis standard; verify requirement).
  • Fee: no submission fee stated for standard articles; any open-access APC handled by Taylor & Francis after acceptance (待核实).

Preflight checklist

Area, type & length

  • Area declared (Geographic Methods / Human / Nature and Society / Physical, Earth & Environmental / General-cross)
  • Article type chosen and its cap met (Article ≤ 11,000 / Forum ≤ 25,000 / Commentary < 2,000 / Special-Issue ~5,000)
  • Total word count includes abstract, references, notes, tables, and figure captions
  • Abstract present + 3-5 keywords, italicized and alphabetized at the abstract's end

Anonymity (double-anonymous)

  • No author names, affiliations, or acknowledgments in the manuscript
  • No obvious self-references; self-citations neutralized
  • Identifying file metadata stripped; study-site detail not de-anonymizing
  • Separate (non-anonymous) title page prepared as a distinct file

Format, exhibits & metadata

  • Chicago author-date formatting; consistent reference list
  • Maps/figures meet Graphics Guidelines (projection, legend, resolution) — see aaag-tables-figures
  • ORCID ready; cover letter notes the area and contribution

Compliance & data

  • Ethics / IRB / consent and geoprivacy handled (see aaag-transparency-and-data)
  • Data-availability statement drafted; provenance + CRS documented
  • Original work; preprint status checked against Taylor & Francis policy; AI-use policy reviewed

Geography-specific anonymity trap

Double-anonymous review is harder in geography because the study site can identify the author. A single-county study by the only group working there, named field stations, or distinctive local data can de-anonymize as effectively as a name in the header. Mitigations:

  • Generalize identifying site descriptors where the argument allows ("a mid-sized county in the US Southeast" rather than naming a tiny home county) — or note the unavoidable in the cover letter.
  • Cite your own prior fieldwork in that site in the third person; strip acknowledgments to funders/locals.
  • Remove GPS metadata and identifying coordinates from figures and attached files.

File set for ScholarOne (verify current requirements)

  • Anonymized main manuscript (no identifiers, clean metadata)
  • Separate, non-anonymous title page (authors, affiliations, ORCID, acknowledgments)
  • Figures/maps at required resolution per the Graphics Guidelines
  • Cover letter (area, contribution, fit); data-availability statement; any supplementary materials

Anti-patterns

  • Counting only the body and overrunning once captions/notes/tables/refs are added
  • Leaving author identifiers in text, acknowledgments, study-site detail, or file metadata
  • Submitting to the wrong area (lands with the wrong editor/reviewers)
  • Non-Chicago citations; missing or non-italicized keywords
  • Maps that fail the Graphics Guidelines (projection/legend/resolution)

Output format

【Area / type】GeogMethods/Human/Nature&Society/Physical-Earth-Env/General-cross · Article/Forum/Commentary/Special-Issue (cap met? Y/N)
【Word count】total incl. abstract/refs/notes/tables/captions vs. cap
【Anonymized】text + self-refs + metadata + study-site detail clean? [Y/N]
【Style】Chicago author-date + 3-5 italicized keywords? [Y/N]
【Data/ethics】geoprivacy + IRB + data-availability statement? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → aaag-rebuttal on revision

Supplementary resources

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.