Spq workflow
Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Social-Psychology-Quarterly-Skills/skills/spq-workflow
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill spq-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use as the entry point for any Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) manuscript. Routes to the right SPQ sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which sociological-social-psychology tradition (symbolic interaction, social structure and personality, group processes, status/affect, identity) and article type (Article vs. Note) fit. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
SKILL.md
5.4 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
SPQ Workflow Router (spq-workflow)
The orchestrator for a Social Psychology Quarterly submission. Figure out the stage, the tradition, and the article type, then send the user to the matching skill. SPQ is the journal of sociological social psychology — the router's first job is to make sure the paper connects social structure or process to the individual (self, interaction, group), not that it is psychology with a survey attached.
When to trigger
- Starting a new SPQ paper and unsure where to begin
- Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
- Deciding between a full Article (≤ 10,000 words) and a Note (≤ 5,000 words)
- Returning with a decision letter (route to
spq-rebuttal)
First question: which tradition and type?
| Situation | Tradition / type | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning-making, self, interaction order, accounts | Symbolic interaction (often interview/observation) | normal pipeline; spq-research-design (interpretive) |
| Social structure / status shaping the self, well-being, attitudes | Social structure and personality (survey/secondary) | normal pipeline |
| Status, expectation states, exchange, legitimacy, justice | Group processes (usually experimental) | normal pipeline; spq-research-design (experiment) |
| Identity salience/verification, affect/emotion modeling | Identity / affect programs | spq-theory-building then design |
| One crisp contribution communicable briefly | Note (≤ 5,000 words) | normal pipeline, tighter scope |
SPQ is interdisciplinary (sociologists and psychologists publish), but the through-line is always the link between the individual and society. If that link is missing, reframe (back to topic-selection).
Routing map (stage → skill)
Idea / fit? → spq-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → spq-literature-positioning
What's the social-psych argument? → spq-theory-building
Is the design defensible? → spq-research-design
Are the analyses sound? → spq-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? → spq-tables-figures
Does it read for the field? → spq-writing-style
Data / materials & ethics? → spq-data-and-transparency
How will it be judged? → spq-review-process
Ready to submit? → spq-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → spq-rebuttal
Default order
topic-selection → literature-positioning → theory-building → research-design → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → data-and-transparency → review-process → submission → rebuttal
Iterate: most papers loop theory ↔ design ↔ analysis several times before writing-style.
Anti-patterns
- Treating SPQ like JPSP or Psychological Science — a study of individual cognition with no link to social structure or interaction is off-fit
- Treating SPQ like ASR/AJS — a macro-sociology paper with no social-psychological mechanism is off-fit
- Forcing an experimental template onto interpretive symbolic-interaction work (SPQ judges each tradition on its own terms)
- Treating data sharing as a gate — SPQ encourages but does not require it (see
spq-data-and-transparency)
Router pass for Social Psychology Quarterly
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the social-psychological process, measurement, design, and boundary condition across groups or contexts; then test whether the manuscript addresses social-psychology reviewers who expect interaction, identity, group process, or status mechanisms grounded in sociological theory.
- Primary move: Run the pack as fit gate, evidence gate, writing gate, source-map gate, and output contract; stop when a gate lacks evidence.
- Decision ledger: return
claim / evidence / blocker / next editrows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly. - Sibling comparison: compare against JPSP for psychology breadth, ASR/AJS for sociology theory stakes, Social Forces for broader empirical sociology; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
- Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open
resources/official-source-map.mdand name the live-check item that could change the upload plan.
Output format
【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / data / review / submit / rebut
【Tradition】symbolic interaction / social structure & personality / group processes / identity / affect
【Type】Article (≤10,000) / Note (≤5,000)
【Route to】spq-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
Supplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— sociological-social-psychology data + software by tradition../../resources/official-source-map.md— official SPQ URLs behind every fact in this pack
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.