agentsclimarketplace

Sensys camera ready

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/SenSys-Skills/skills/sensys-camera-ready

Use when preparing an accepted SenSys camera-ready — de-anonymizing the double-column ACM final, completing ACM rights and metadata, restoring acknowledgments, landing the awarded ACM artifact badges onto the paper, releasing traces and firmware within their constraints, and planning the in-person talk and demo for the merged audience.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sensys-camera-ready

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

4.6 KB, 982 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

SenSys Camera-Ready

Acceptance flips the paper from anonymous-under-review to a permanent ACM DL record. The camera-ready is a checklist of irreversible steps: de-anonymize completely, get the ACM rights and metadata exactly right, land any artifact badges onto the printed paper, and prepare to present to a room that now spans the merged SenSys/IPSN/IoTDI communities. A metadata or rights slip here is corrected only by a painful post-publication erratum.

De-anonymize completely

Everything double-blind suppressed now goes back — and nothing may be missed:

[ ] Author names, affiliations, and emails restored on the paper.
[ ] Acknowledgments and funding/grant numbers added back.
[ ] Self-citations returned to first person where natural.
[ ] Artifact links de-blinded to their permanent public homes (with DOIs).
[ ] PDF metadata now correctly names authors (was scrubbed for review).

Run the inverse of the submission blindness sweep: the risk now is an un-restored acknowledgment or a still-anonymized repo link, not a leak.

ACM rights and metadata

The ACM e-rights process gates the final. Complete it precisely:

ItemActionFailure cost
e-rights formChoose the license/transfer the process offers; get the exact rights text + DOIWrong rights block on the PDF
Rights stampPaste ACM's rights text and conference string verbatim into the templateReprint / erratum
Author metadataNames, affiliations, ORCIDs match the form and the PDFACM DL record errors
Title/abstractMatch the accepted paper exactlyIndexing mismatch
Template versionUse the ACM double-column version the CFP names (待核实 per cycle)Production rejection

Extra camera-ready pages are sometimes granted for reviewer-requested additions; confirm the exact allowance for the cycle before spending them.

Coordinate the artifact badges onto the paper

If you pursued badges (sensys-artifact-evaluation), the camera-ready is where awarded badges are attached to the printed paper and the ACM DL metadata. Confirm:

[ ] Each awarded badge (Available / Functional / Reproduced) appears on the final PDF.
[ ] The permanent artifact DOI in the paper matches the archived deposit.
[ ] Released traces/firmware honor their consent/NDA/location constraints (sensys-reproducibility).
[ ] The public repo README maps claims → the script/trace that reproduces each figure.

Do not release sensor data, firmware, or deployment locations you have not cleared — the public release is permanent.

Plan the talk and demo

SenSys is in-person; presenting to the merged audience means a room with sensor-networks, embedded, IoT, and on-device-AI expertise all present:

  • Lead with the physical problem, not the architecture — the same first-page arc as the paper (sensys-writing-style), compressed to a few minutes.
  • Show the measurement, not just the claim: a power trace or a latency CDF lands harder than a bullet saying "efficient."
  • A live or recorded demo of the node/deployment is unusually persuasive at SenSys; if you demo, rehearse the failure modes (a dead battery on stage is avoidable).
  • Anticipate the merged audience's questions: an IPSN-rooted reviewer asks about the protocol; an IoTDI-rooted one about deployment; an embedded-AI one about footprint. Have all three ready.

Final camera-ready sequence

1. De-anonymize fully; inverse blindness sweep passes.
2. ACM e-rights complete; rights text + DOI stamped verbatim in the template.
3. Metadata (authors, ORCIDs, title, abstract) matches the form and PDF.
4. Awarded badges + artifact DOI on the final PDF; public release cleared.
5. Compile in the correct template version; re-read the produced PDF.
6. Talk + demo built from the measured-behavior arc; merged-audience Q&A prepared.

Output format

[Deanon]   de-anonymization complete? un-restored items listed
[Rights]   ACM e-rights done; rights text + DOI stamped — pass/gap
[Metadata] authors/ORCIDs/title/abstract consistent across form and PDF
[Badges]   awarded badges + artifact DOI on the final; release cleared
[Talk]     talk/demo built from the measured-behavior arc; Q&A ready
[Open]     the one irreversible item still unconfirmed before the deadline

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.