agentsclimarketplace

Qe topic selection

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Quantitative-Economics-Skills/skills/qe-topic-selection

Use when first judging whether a project fits Quantitative Economics (QE) — a substantive economic question answered with serious quantitative methods (empirical, structural/computational, experimental, or simulation), sister to Econometrica and Theoretical Economics. Tests fit and sharpens the question; it does not design the estimation.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill qe-topic-selection

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

5.2 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Topic Selection (qe-topic-selection)

When to trigger

  • You have data, a model, or an experiment but are unsure QE is the right home
  • The project feels like "pure theory" or "pure method" and you suspect a sibling journal fits better
  • The economic question behind the quantitative exercise is not yet sharp
  • You are choosing between QE, Econometrica, and a top field journal

The QE fit bar

QE is the Econometric Society's general-interest, empirically and quantitatively oriented journal. Its comparative advantage among the ES trio is explicit: Econometrica leans theoretical/methodological, Theoretical Economics is pure theory, and QE publishes papers that develop or apply quantitative methods to substantive economic questions — empirical, computational/structural, experimental, and simulation-based — with a strong premium on documented data and reproducible code. The fit test is two-pronged:

  1. Is there a first-order economic question? A quantitative exercise with no economic payoff (an estimator with no application, a simulation with no question) drifts toward Econometrica or a methods outlet.
  2. Does answering it require serious quantitative work? A purely descriptive note without methodological or computational content under-fits QE's quantitative identity.

The sweet spot is a paper where the method and the answer reinforce each other: a structural model that delivers a counterfactual a reduced-form design cannot; an empirical design that pins down a parameter the literature has only assumed; an experiment whose data discipline a quantitative model; a simulation that resolves a measurement puzzle.

Paper archetypes that fit QE

  • Structural / computational: estimate a model, then run a policy counterfactual or welfare calculation.
  • Applied micro / finance with quantitative ambition: a credible causal design whose magnitudes feed an economic quantity of interest.
  • Experimental: lab / lab-in-the-field / online experiments whose data identify a parameter or test a quantitative theory (note QE's Jan 2026 pre-registration and instructions rules).
  • Simulation-based / measurement: new data or methods that quantify something previously unmeasured, with reproducible code.

Checklist

  • The substantive economic question is stated in one sentence a non-specialist cares about
  • The quantitative method is necessary to answer it (not decoration, not the whole point)
  • The contribution is general-interest, not confined to one narrow subfield
  • Data and code can be documented and made non-exclusive (ES policy) — no fatal access barrier
  • QE beats the sibling alternatives: not pure theory (TE), not method-first (Econometrica)
  • If experimental/own-data: a recognized pre-registration is feasible (effective Jan 2026)

Anti-patterns

  • A new estimator with a toy application — likely Econometrica, not QE
  • A pure theorem with no quantification — Theoretical Economics
  • A descriptive note with no quantitative or methodological content
  • A question so narrow that only one subfield would cite the answer
  • Data so locked down that the ES reproducibility regime cannot be satisfied

Routing a project across the Econometric Society trio

The three ES journals are open-access siblings; the fit test routes a project among them by what the contribution primarily is.

Project shapeBest ES homeTell
theory-meets-data-meets-computation; a quantitative answerQuantitative Economicsa number the field lacked + reproducible code
a new estimator or limit theorem, application secondaryEconometricathe method is the point
a model and proofs, no quantificationTheoretical Economicsno estimand, no data

When two homes seem plausible, ask which sentence the abstract would lead with — a quantity (QE) or a theorem/estimator (Econometrica/TE).

Worked vignette: a fit judgment in practice (illustrative)

A team has panel data and a new control-function estimator for a production function with unobserved productivity. If the paper's punchline is "our estimator has better finite-sample properties," the home is Econometrica. The QE pivot: use the estimator to answer a question — "correcting the bias raises the estimated returns to scale from 0.92 to 1.04 (illustrative), overturning the constant-returns benchmark for this industry." Now the method serves a quantitative answer with a reproducible package, and the fit is QE rather than a methods outlet.

Output format

【Question】one sentence, general-interest?
【Quantitative method】structural / empirical / experimental / simulation
【Why the method is necessary】...
【Sibling check】not pure theory (TE), not method-first (Econometrica)? [Y/N]
【Reproducibility feasible】data/code can be documented + non-exclusive? [Y/N]
【Next step】qe-literature-positioning

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.