agentsclimarketplace

Phg workflow

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Progress-in-Human-Geography-Skills/skills/phg-workflow

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill phg-workflow

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when starting or navigating any Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) manuscript and you need the entry point. Routes to the right sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and whether the piece is a free-standing review article or a commissioned Progress Report. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

SKILL.md

4.8 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

PiHG Workflow Router (phg-workflow)

The orchestrator for a Progress in Human Geography submission. Figure out the stage and the genre, then send the user to the matching skill. PiHG is the discipline's review and theory flagship — the router's first job is to make sure the piece is a synthetic, agenda-setting review, not an empirical study wearing a review's clothes. PiHG does not publish empirical results or detailed cases.

When to trigger

  • Starting a new PiHG piece and unsure where to begin
  • Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
  • Deciding whether you are writing a review article (open submission) or a Progress Report (commissioned)
  • Unsure whether the topic is review-worthy at all (route to phg-topic-selection)
  • Returning with a decision letter (route to phg-rebuttal)

First question: is this even a PiHG piece?

Run the fit gate before routing anywhere else.

CheckPass conditionRoute if it fails
Not empiricalThe core is an argument about a literature, not new data or a single casethis is the wrong journal — stop
Review-worthyThe literature is large, live, and contested, with real stakesphg-topic-selection
Has an interventionYou can name what the field is getting wrong and how you re-order itphg-critical-intervention
SyntheticThe sources add up to one argument, not a listphg-argument-synthesis

If "not empirical" fails — the piece would be unchanged if you deleted the argument and kept the data — PiHG is the wrong venue; consider an empirical geography journal instead.

Second question: which genre?

GenreWhat it isRoute
Review articleFree-standing, unsolicited critical review (~4,000–8,000 words)full default order below
Progress ReportCommissioned critical survey of a sub-field's recent worksame craft, but scope to the report's remit; confirm with the editor
PiHG Lecture / commentaryInvited; formats varyconfirm current practice on the SAGE page (phg-submission)

Progress Reports are invited by the editors — you cannot submit one cold. If you have a report commission, the same skills apply, scoped to the agreed remit.

Routing map (stage → skill)

Is the topic review-worthy?        → phg-topic-selection
What concept organizes it?         → phg-theory-building
Where does it sit in the field?    → phg-literature-positioning
Do the sources add to one arg?     → phg-argument-synthesis
What is the critical move?         → phg-critical-intervention
What is the forward agenda?        → phg-contribution-framing
Do the exhibits do synthesis?      → phg-tables-figures
Does it read as PiHG?              → phg-writing-style
Ready to submit?                   → phg-submission
How will it be judged?             → phg-review-process
Got an R&R / decision?             → phg-rebuttal

Default order

topic-selection → theory-building → literature-positioning → argument-synthesis → critical-intervention → contribution-framing → tables-figures → writing-style → submission → review-process → rebuttal

Iterate: most essays loop theory ↔ synthesis ↔ intervention several times before writing-style.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating PiHG as a place to publish an empirical study "framed as a review" — it is not
  • Writing an annotated bibliography and calling it a review (no cumulative argument)
  • Submitting something billed as a Progress Report without a commission
  • Reviewing a settled, niche literature with no live debate or stakes
  • Overrunning the short (~8,000-word inclusive) cap because a review "needs to be comprehensive"

Output format

【Genre】review article / Progress Report (commissioned) / lecture-commentary
【Stage】topic / theory / positioning / synthesis / intervention / framing / exhibits / writing / submit / review / rebut
【Fit gate】not-empirical? review-worthy? has-intervention? synthetic? [Y/N each]
【Route to】phg-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 327,132. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.