agentsclimarketplace

Molcell figures

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Molecular-Cell-Skills/skills/molcell-figures

Use to finalize Molecular Cell display items — column-width sizing, minimum fonts, RGB, show-the-data with defined error bars/n/replicate type, gel/blot and structural-figure integrity, colorblind-safe palettes, multi-panel discipline, and stand-alone legends built for a mechanism proof.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill molcell-figures

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

5.4 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Display Items (molcell-figures)

When to trigger

  • Figures will not render legibly at Cell Press print widths.
  • Bar charts hide the data (no points, no n, no defined error bars) behind a mechanistic claim.
  • Gels/blots are cropped without disclosure; structural figures over-render the model.
  • Color is the sole encoding, or rainbow/jet maps are used for continuous data.

Sizing for Cell Press columns

Design figures to render at final print width without rescaling text:

  • 1 column85 mm wide
  • 1.5 column114 mm wide
  • 2 columns (full width)174 mm wide
  • Minimum font in the final figure: ~6–7 pt sans-serif (Helvetica/Arial), legible after reduction.
  • RGB color mode (Cell Press is online-first); line weights heavy enough to survive reduction.

Confirm exact widths, resolution, and file formats against the current Cell Press figure/digital-image guidelines.

Show the mechanism's data, not just a summary

  • Replace bar-of-means with dot plots / box+points / violins+points, especially for small n.
  • State n and what n is in every legend: independent biological replicates? technical replicates? molecules? cells?
  • Error bars must be defined (SD vs SEM vs 95% CI) — never undefined — and the replicate type stated.
  • For a mechanistic claim, pair the quantification with the primary data (the gel, the trace, the density map) in the same or an adjacent panel.

Molecular-biology figure integrity (non-negotiable)

  • Gels/blots: show representative full lanes; disclose any splicing with a clear dividing line; present uncropped key blots in Supplemental; keep unprocessed scans.
  • Quantitative comparisons must come from the same gel/exposure/experiment.
  • Structures (cryo-EM/X-ray): report resolution, map-to-model fit, and the region actually resolved; do not draw side chains or interactions the density does not support. Include a validation/FSC or Ramachandran summary per Cell Press/PDB norms.
  • Genomics tracks (ChIP/RNA/ATAC-seq): state normalization, show replicates or a replicate-correlation metric, and give the genomic scale.
  • Single-molecule / kinetics: show example traces and the distribution, not only a fitted rate.

Color and accessibility

  • Use a colorblind-safe palette; avoid red/green as the only contrast (common in merge micrographs).
  • Do not encode meaning by color alone — add shape/pattern/labels.
  • No rainbow/jet colormaps for continuous data — use perceptually uniform maps (viridis, etc.); for structures, use consistent domain/chain coloring.
  • Check the figure in grayscale.

Multi-panel discipline

  • Group panels by the mechanistic step they prove; one message per figure.
  • Consistent axis scales across comparable panels; align structure orientations across panels.
  • Label panels A, B, C…; the legend title states the figure's mechanistic claim.
  • Move orthogonal-confirmation panels to Supplemental rather than shrinking fonts.

Figure legend structure (stand-alone)

Each legend: a short title sentence (the mechanistic claim), then per-panel descriptions (A, B, C…), then statistics (test, exact n, replicate type, error-bar definition, P values or exact values), plus any structure/genomics metadata (resolution, normalization). The figure + legend must be interpretable without the main text; cross-reference STAR Methods where relevant.

What a Molecular Cell referee checks in figures

Referees interrogate the proof of mechanism, so they read figures for evidence sufficiency. Common figure-driven major-revision triggers: a mechanistic claim resting on one assay with no orthogonal confirmation; a point-mutant panel missing the wild-type-rescue control; a structure figure asserting an interaction the density cannot resolve; bar-of-means hiding n = 3 with wide spread; genomics tracks with no replicate metric; error bars whose definition or n is missing; and any blot spliced without a disclosed boundary. Pre-empt each: pair every key claim with a second method, show the points and the primary data, and keep uncropped scans and half-maps ready — Molecular Cell may request them.

Output format

【Item count】 N (standard Article ≤ ~7 main) → ok / over → move to Supplemental
【Sizing】 designed at 85 / 114 / 174 mm? fonts ≥6–7 pt? RGB? yes/no
【Data shown】 points + n + replicate type + defined error bars + primary data? yes/no
【Blot/structure/genomics integrity】 uncropped blots? resolution/fit stated? replicate metric? yes/no
【Colorblind-safe】 yes/no (palette used)
【Legends】 title + per-panel + stats, stand-alone? yes/no
【Fixes】 [...]
【Next】 molcell-star-methods

Anti-patterns

  • Do not paste raw Prism/ImageJ/instrument screenshots as figures.
  • Do not use bars to hide a tiny, variable n — show the points.
  • Do not draw structural contacts the density does not support.
  • Do not crop or splice blots without a visible boundary and disclosure.
  • Do not show a single genomics replicate as if it were the result.

Confirm specs against the current Cell Press figure and digital-image guidelines.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.