Mobisys workflow
Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/MobiSys-Skills/skills/mobisys-workflow
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mobisys-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when planning a MobiSys project timeline backward from the single early-December paper deadline through registration, two-round review with an early-reject cut, the rebuttal, notification, artifact evaluation, camera-ready, and the June conference — with device-experiment lead time built in and the one-deadline-per-year risk made explicit.
SKILL.md
4.5 KB, 941 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
MobiSys Workflow
Use this as the project-management skill for a MobiSys submission. Replace every date with the
current official timetable and work backward from the one hard December cutoff on the
mobisys<yy>.hotcrp.com/deadlines page.
MobiSys is a conference, not a journal: no standing editor-in-chief, no article-processing charge. The rotating leadership is the per-edition General Chairs and Program Chairs (2026 General Chairs: Fahim Kawsar and Cecilia Mascolo; Program Chairs 待核实). Committees rotate yearly — re-check the current organizing-committee page rather than carrying a name forward.
The one-deadline calendar
Unlike MobiCom and NSDI, which run two deadlines a year, MobiSys runs a single paper deadline in early December feeding the following June conference. There is no second gate this cycle to catch a slip. That single fact governs the whole plan: the device experiments must be finished, not started, before December.
Milestones
- Venue fit: confirm the contribution is a mobile/embedded system whose device behavior is
the result (
mobisys-topic-selection). - Evidence lock: freeze the system design and finish the on-device measurement campaign — energy, latency, memory, thermal, and any deployment/user study.
- Paper registration: register title, abstract, authors, and conflicts on HotCRP before the registration cutoff that precedes the paper upload.
- Paper deadline: upload the anonymous 12-page double-column PDF and required HotCRP fields.
- Round-1 outcome: early-reject notifications go out; survivors proceed to round 2.
- Round-2 reviews + rebuttal: read reviews, then draft a scope-limited rebuttal
(
mobisys-author-response). - Notification: archive reviews, rebuttal, and decision.
- Acceptance: prepare the ACM camera-ready, artifact-evaluation submission, registration, and the June in-person talk and demo.
Backward plan from the December deadline
| Weeks out (heuristic) | Mobile-systems milestone |
|---|---|
| 12+ | System built; measurement harness and power instrument working end to end |
| 8 | On-device runs complete on all target devices; energy/latency logged with provenance |
| 6 | Deployment or user study done if the claim is a service |
| 4 | Full draft sitting in the 12-page ACM double-column template |
| 3 | Internal mock review by a systems reader; break-condition experiment added |
| 2 | Anonymity sweep including device/trace giveaways; artifact package smoke-tested |
| 1 | Numbers regenerated from logs so PDF and artifact cannot diverge |
| 0 | Registration then paper on HotCRP before the UTC cutoff |
These offsets are planning heuristics only — anchor each to the current official timetable, never to a previous cycle's calendar.
Failure modes by stage
- Starting device measurement in November forces single-device, single-run results that read as under-evaluated — the classic MobiSys evidence reject.
- Leaving format conversion to the final week surfaces overflow late; the 12-page double-column budget is tighter than a working draft once figures are placed.
- Skipping the mock review forfeits the only chance to hear "your energy boundary is undefined" from a colleague instead of a reviewer.
- Building the artifact after the paper deadline forfeits the ACM badges, which need a working
script-first package the AEC can run on its own machines (
mobisys-artifact-evaluation).
Coordination notes
- Assign one named owner for the on-device measurement provenance and another for the anonymity sweep; shared ownership is how both slip.
- Archive the exact submitted PDF, supplement, and artifact commit, since rebuttal replies must quote them precisely and camera-ready must match the reviewed version.
- Because a miss costs a full year, decide the go/no-go on evidence completeness by the four-week mark, not on deadline night.
Output format
[Current stage] idea / building / measuring / writing / registration / submitted / rebuttal / accepted
[Next official deadline] <date and source, or unknown>
[Critical path] <three tasks that determine readiness>
[Risk register] <device evidence / page budget / anonymity / artifact / one-deadline slip>
[Owner map] <task -> person or role>
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.