agentsclimarketplace

Mobisys workflow

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/MobiSys-Skills/skills/mobisys-workflow

Use when planning a MobiSys project timeline backward from the single early-December paper deadline through registration, two-round review with an early-reject cut, the rebuttal, notification, artifact evaluation, camera-ready, and the June conference — with device-experiment lead time built in and the one-deadline-per-year risk made explicit.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mobisys-workflow

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

4.5 KB, 941 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

MobiSys Workflow

Use this as the project-management skill for a MobiSys submission. Replace every date with the current official timetable and work backward from the one hard December cutoff on the mobisys<yy>.hotcrp.com/deadlines page.

MobiSys is a conference, not a journal: no standing editor-in-chief, no article-processing charge. The rotating leadership is the per-edition General Chairs and Program Chairs (2026 General Chairs: Fahim Kawsar and Cecilia Mascolo; Program Chairs 待核实). Committees rotate yearly — re-check the current organizing-committee page rather than carrying a name forward.

The one-deadline calendar

Unlike MobiCom and NSDI, which run two deadlines a year, MobiSys runs a single paper deadline in early December feeding the following June conference. There is no second gate this cycle to catch a slip. That single fact governs the whole plan: the device experiments must be finished, not started, before December.

Milestones

  • Venue fit: confirm the contribution is a mobile/embedded system whose device behavior is the result (mobisys-topic-selection).
  • Evidence lock: freeze the system design and finish the on-device measurement campaign — energy, latency, memory, thermal, and any deployment/user study.
  • Paper registration: register title, abstract, authors, and conflicts on HotCRP before the registration cutoff that precedes the paper upload.
  • Paper deadline: upload the anonymous 12-page double-column PDF and required HotCRP fields.
  • Round-1 outcome: early-reject notifications go out; survivors proceed to round 2.
  • Round-2 reviews + rebuttal: read reviews, then draft a scope-limited rebuttal (mobisys-author-response).
  • Notification: archive reviews, rebuttal, and decision.
  • Acceptance: prepare the ACM camera-ready, artifact-evaluation submission, registration, and the June in-person talk and demo.

Backward plan from the December deadline

Weeks out (heuristic)Mobile-systems milestone
12+System built; measurement harness and power instrument working end to end
8On-device runs complete on all target devices; energy/latency logged with provenance
6Deployment or user study done if the claim is a service
4Full draft sitting in the 12-page ACM double-column template
3Internal mock review by a systems reader; break-condition experiment added
2Anonymity sweep including device/trace giveaways; artifact package smoke-tested
1Numbers regenerated from logs so PDF and artifact cannot diverge
0Registration then paper on HotCRP before the UTC cutoff

These offsets are planning heuristics only — anchor each to the current official timetable, never to a previous cycle's calendar.

Failure modes by stage

  • Starting device measurement in November forces single-device, single-run results that read as under-evaluated — the classic MobiSys evidence reject.
  • Leaving format conversion to the final week surfaces overflow late; the 12-page double-column budget is tighter than a working draft once figures are placed.
  • Skipping the mock review forfeits the only chance to hear "your energy boundary is undefined" from a colleague instead of a reviewer.
  • Building the artifact after the paper deadline forfeits the ACM badges, which need a working script-first package the AEC can run on its own machines (mobisys-artifact-evaluation).

Coordination notes

  • Assign one named owner for the on-device measurement provenance and another for the anonymity sweep; shared ownership is how both slip.
  • Archive the exact submitted PDF, supplement, and artifact commit, since rebuttal replies must quote them precisely and camera-ready must match the reviewed version.
  • Because a miss costs a full year, decide the go/no-go on evidence completeness by the four-week mark, not on deadline night.

Output format

[Current stage] idea / building / measuring / writing / registration / submitted / rebuttal / accepted
[Next official deadline] <date and source, or unknown>
[Critical path] <three tasks that determine readiness>
[Risk register] <device evidence / page budget / anonymity / artifact / one-deadline slip>
[Owner map] <task -> person or role>

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.