agentsclimarketplace

Jppm submission

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-submission

Use when running the final preflight for a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) submission — the two-file split, double-anonymization, 50-page cap, Policy Contribution Statement, abstract/keywords, and the SageTrack portal. Final checks only; it does not draft content.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-submission

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

4.9 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Submission Preflight (jppm-submission)

When to trigger

  • Submitting to JPP&M this week and running the last-mile checks
  • Unsure how the 50-page all-inclusive cap counts your appendices
  • Assembling the title page, main document, and web appendix into the required files
  • Verifying anonymization, statements, and declarations before SageTrack upload

Process facts (checked 2026-07-16 on ama.org / SAGE; re-check volatile items on the official site)

  • JPP&M is an American Marketing Association journal published by SAGE (pISSN 0743-9156, eISSN 1547-7207). Joint Editors in Chief Melissa Bublitz and Stacey Finkelstein began processing new submissions April 1, 2026, succeeding Jeremy Kees and Beth Vallen — re-verify the masthead on the AMA editors page before submitting.
  • Portal: SageTrack (ScholarOne) at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ama_jppm.
  • Length: maximum 50 pages, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, inclusive of title, abstract, keywords, text, footnotes, references, tables, figures, and print appendices — enforced at all stages of review. Tables and references may be single-spaced per the AMA guidelines; web appendices sit outside the cap (re-check the current guidelines for what counts as a print vs. web appendix).
  • Required pieces: an unstructured abstract of 200 words; at least 3 keywords; a Policy Contribution Statement (≤300 words) on the first page of the main document, excluded from the page cap.
  • Review model: double-anonymized. Submit at least two files — (1) a title page with authors, affiliations, acknowledgments; (2) an anonymized main document. Refer to data sites generically ("a large public university," "a Fortune 500 retailer").
  • Style: AMA journals house style for citations, references, headings, and exhibits (shared with JM/JMR) — confirm details on the AMA submission-guidelines page; fees/membership requirements, if any, should be checked on the portal at submission (re-check on the official site).

Templates: templates/checklist.md and templates/manuscript_template.md.

Preflight checklist

Files & length

  • Title page (identifying info, acknowledgments, funding) as a separate file
  • Main document anonymized; opens with the Policy Contribution Statement
  • Page count ≤50 double-spaced pages counting everything printed except the statement
  • Web appendix assembled separately for the overflow battery

Required statements & metadata

  • Policy Contribution Statement ≤300 words with all three elements (conversation / advance / stakeholders)
  • Abstract ≤200 words; ≥3 specific keywords after it
  • IRB/ethics approval stated for human-subjects work, with extra care documented for vulnerable populations
  • Funding, conflicts of interest, and any AI-use disclosure prepared per current AMA policy
  • Data-availability plan ready (what can be shared; what is restricted and why)

Anonymization sweep

  • No author names, affiliations, or thanks in the main document
  • Self-citations phrased in third person; no "our prior work"
  • File metadata (Author field, tracked changes, comments) scrubbed in every uploaded file
  • Pre-registration links use anonymized view-only versions
  • Institutions and field partners referred to generically

Fit signals the desk screen checks

  • The statement and abstract independently convey a policy-first paper
  • Implications name actors with authority to act
  • Evaluation designs show their counterfactual in the abstract/statement, not page 30

Anti-patterns

  • Counting on the web appendix to hide print-appendix material the guidelines count against the cap
  • A Policy Contribution Statement that summarizes the abstract instead of answering its three questions
  • Anonymizing the text but uploading files whose metadata names the authors
  • Discovering at upload that the portal requires declarations you never drafted
  • Submitting under the old editorial team's expectations without re-checking current policies

Output format

【Files】title page / anonymized main doc / web appendix — ready? [Y/N each]
【Length】≤50 pages all-inclusive at current stage? [Y/N + count]
【Statement】Policy Contribution Statement ≤300 words, 3 elements? [Y/N]
【Abstract & keywords】≤200 words + ≥3 keywords? [Y/N]
【Anonymization】text + metadata + links swept? [Y/N]
【Declarations】ethics, COI, funding, data availability? [Y/N]
【Portal】mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ama_jppm confirmed live? [Y / re-check]
【Next step】submit, then jppm-review-process

What ships with it: 2 files

5.7 KB alongside SKILL.md

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.