agentsclimarketplace

Jmf workflow

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Journal-of-Marriage-and-Family-Skills/skills/jmf-workflow

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmf-workflow

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use as the entry point for any Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) manuscript. Routes to the right JMF sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether the work fits a full article or a brief report. JMF is the interdisciplinary flagship of family science; the router's first job is to confirm a genuine family-science contribution. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

SKILL.md

5.0 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

JMF Workflow Router (jmf-workflow)

The orchestrator for a JMF submission. Figure out the stage and the format (full article vs. brief report), then send the user to the matching skill. JMF publishes family-science research across sociology, psychology, demography, and family studies — the router keeps the paper pointed at a families-and-close-relationships contribution, not a generic social-science result.

When to trigger

  • Starting a new JMF paper and unsure where to begin
  • Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
  • Deciding between a full article and a brief report
  • Returning with a decision letter (route to jmf-rebuttal)

First question: which format?

SituationFormatRoute to
Full original study, broad family-science significanceArticle (≤ ~35 pp.)normal pipeline below
Focused single contribution, replication, innovative design, or important null findingBrief Report (≤ ~25 pp.)normal pipeline, tighter scope
Re-running / reassessing a published family findingReplication (often a brief report)jmf-research-design + jmf-transparency-and-data-policy
Prospective design, not yet collected/analyzedPreregister / consider OSFjmf-research-design (PAP) early

Brief reports are not "short articles you padded down" — they are crisp, complete contributions.

Routing map (stage → skill)

Idea / fit?                        → jmf-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field?    → jmf-literature-positioning
What's the framework?              → jmf-theory-and-conceptual-framework
Is the design defensible?          → jmf-research-design
Are the analyses sound?            → jmf-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear?            → jmf-tables-figures
Does it read in modified APA?      → jmf-writing-style
Repro package & data statement?    → jmf-transparency-and-data-policy
How will it be judged?             → jmf-review-process
Ready to submit?                   → jmf-submission
Got a revise-and-resubmit?         → jmf-rebuttal

Default order

topic-selection → literature-positioning → theory-and-conceptual-framework → research-design → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → transparency-and-data-policy → review-process → submission → rebuttal

Iterate: most papers loop framework ↔ design ↔ analysis several times before writing-style.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating JMF like a general sociology or psychology journal — the contribution must advance family science (families, couples, parents, children, kin)
  • Ignoring the unit of analysis (individual vs. dyad vs. family) when picking the next skill
  • Padding a complete focused study into a full article when a brief report would land harder
  • Skipping the data availability statement and repro package until the end

Router pass for Journal of Marriage and Family

Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the family process, population/sample frame, measurement validity, and longitudinal or comparative leverage; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: family scholars who inspect measurement, household process, longitudinal design, and implications for family theory.

  • Do the pass: Run the pack as a sequence: fit gate, evidence gate, writing gate, source-map gate, and final output contract; stop when a gate lacks evidence.
  • Return a ledger: give claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.
  • Sibling guard: compare against Demography for population-process emphasis, Social Forces for general sociology, Child Development for child-centered outcomes; if a sibling owns the contribution, recommend re-routing before polishing format.
  • Stop condition: do not give submission-ready advice until the pack's resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.

Output format

【Stage】idea / positioning / framework / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut
【Format】Article / Brief Report / Replication
【Route to】jmf-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 327,132. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.