agentsclimarketplace

Jmr topic selection

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Journal-of-Marketing-Research-Skills/skills/jmr-topic-selection

Use when testing whether a marketing question is a fit for the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) — a methods-/modeling-forward AMA flagship — rather than the managerial Journal of Marketing, the analytical Marketing Science, or the consumer-theory JCR. Locks a question that can clear both JMR's rigor bar and its substantive-contribution bar.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmr-topic-selection

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

5.0 KB, 981 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Topic Selection & JMR Fit (jmr-topic-selection)

When to trigger

  • You have a marketing idea but are unsure JMR is the right AMA/marketing venue
  • A finding is managerially interesting but you are unsure it advances research
  • You cannot tell whether the paper is behavioral, modeling/econometric, or methods
  • A coauthor says "this might be a JM paper" or "this is really Marketing Science"

The JMR fit test

JMR publishes the full spectrum of marketing topics with an emphasis on methodological rigor and welcomes a wide variety of data and methodological approaches. Fit at JMR is a dual test, not a topic test:

  1. Rigor bar — Can the design credibly support the claim? (clean experimental identification, a defensible causal/econometric strategy, or a well-identified structural model.)
  2. Substance bar — Do marketing researchers learn something — a new substantive insight about consumers, markets, or marketing actions, or a usable methodological advance? A flawless null with no insight does not clear it.

A JMR-fit topic clears both. A topic that is only managerially compelling but methodologically thin belongs at Journal of Marketing; a topic that is only a clever model with no marketing payoff belongs at Marketing Science.

Classify the genre early

GenreCenter of gravityTypical JMR home
BehavioralLab/field experiments, consumer psychology, process testsYes
Modeling / econometricChoice models, structural demand, causal field dataYes
Methods contributionA new estimator, measure, or research procedureYes

The genre sets which downstream skills do the heavy lifting (jmr-methods, jmr-data-analysis).

Sister-journal triage

  • Journal of Marketing (JM) — manager-facing, substantive framing; lighter on method. If the lead is "what should managers do," consider JM.
  • Marketing Science — analytical/structural quantitative marketing; if the contribution is the model itself with no broad marketing-research insight, it may fit there.
  • Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) — deep consumer-behavior theory, interdisciplinary; if the payoff is a consumer-psychology theory rather than a method-credible marketing finding, consider JCR.

Pre-commitment checks

  • A one-sentence research question naming the marketing phenomenon and the unit (consumer, firm, market).
  • A stated genre and the matching identification/estimation plan.
  • An explicit "what we learn" sentence — substantive, methodological, or both.
  • Feasible data/stimuli that can survive the exact-statistics mandate (p-values to three digits, SEs, effect sizes) and replication disclosure.

Pitch stress-test: one rewrite, both bars

Managerial-only pitch (JM signal): "We show retailers can lift loyalty-program enrollment with default-framed sign-up prompts."

JMR-ready pitch: "Across preregistered field experiments with a retail partner, we identify when default-framed enrollment prompts raise sign-ups, show the effect reverses under high perceived monitoring, and offer a process account that revises what choice-architecture work predicts for opt-in marketing programs."

The rewrite clears both bars in one breath: the rigor bar is stated up front (preregistered field experiments, a reversal that disciplines the process story) and the substance bar is explicit (a boundary condition plus a revised prediction — something marketing researchers learn, not just an effect size a manager could deploy). If your best one-sentence pitch cannot be rewritten this way, the genre or the venue is wrong.

Anti-patterns

  • Choosing a topic on managerial appeal alone (a JM signal, not JMR).
  • A method showcase with no marketing payoff (a Marketing Science risk).
  • Picking a question whose data can never support credible identification.
  • Deferring the genre decision until methods — it should be set now.

Output format

[Target] JMR
[Question] one sentence
[Genre] behavioral / modeling-econometric / methods
[Rigor bar] can the design support the claim? ...
[Substance bar] what do researchers learn? ...
[Sister-journal risk] JM / Marketing Science / JCR → answer
[Next skill] jmr-theory-development

Resources

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.