Jmr writing style
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmr-writing-styleAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when polishing prose for a Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) manuscript — a third-person 200-word abstract, AMA author-year citations, the exact-statistics number conventions, and a front-loaded research argument that clears JMR's dual bar without drifting into managerial Journal-of-Marketing framing. Late-stage polish only.
SKILL.md
4.6 KB, 918 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Writing Style (jmr-writing-style)
When to trigger
- The abstract, intro, or prose buries the contribution
- Citations and numbers are not in AMA style
- The writing reads as a managerial pitch rather than a research argument
- Final language polish before submission (after the contribution is settled)
JMR-specific style rules
- Abstract: 200 words maximum, written in the third person. It should state the marketing question, the approach (experiment/model), the key result, and the contribution — not a teaser. (Title ≤ 25 words; up to 8 keywords.)
- Citations: AMA author-year style — "Thorelli (1960)" / "(Thorelli 1960)"; list all authors up to three, "et al." for four or more. There is no reference cap, so cite both relevant behavioral and modeling work. Not APA-numeric.
- Numbers in prose: report exact p-values to three digits, with no leading zero (
p = .032,.97), and no more than three decimals; report effect sizes alongside significance. Mirror the table conventions in the text. - Formatting: 12-point Times New Roman (or 12-point LaTeX font), double-spaced (tables/references may be single-spaced), 1-inch margins; no page/line numbers, no headers/footers. Keep the print article within 50 pages.
Write a front-loaded research argument
- Open with the marketing phenomenon and the research question, then the gap/tension, then what you do and find — the contribution should be visible on page one without the appendix.
- Use active voice and direct sentences; explain the mechanism or identification in plain terms before the technical detail.
- Keep it a research contribution. Managerial implications belong in the discussion as a consequence of the findings, not as the lead — leading with "what managers should do" reads as a Journal of Marketing paper.
- Match register to genre: behavioral papers narrate the process and converging studies; modeling papers state the question, the model intuition, then the identification.
AI-content disclosure
If any AI-generated content is used, it must be identified in the main document (e.g., in Methods) and noted in the Acknowledgments — write these in now so the submission conforms.
Anti-patterns
- A first-person or results-teaser abstract, or one over 200 words.
- APA-numeric citations; "p < .05" or asterisks in prose; leading zeros before decimals.
- Managerial-pitch framing that hides the research contribution.
- Polishing prose before the contribution and identification are settled.
Style execution pass for Journal of Marketing Research
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the marketing construct, data or study design, inference threat, and managerial or consumer implication; then test whether the manuscript addresses marketing reviewers who expect measurement, experiments, consumer behavior, or empirical strategy to answer a marketing question.
- Primary move: Rewrite the opening and transitions so the venue-level claim, evidence object, and contribution are visible before technical detail; keep house-style limits tied to the source map.
- Decision ledger: return
claim / evidence / blocker / next editrows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly. - Sibling comparison: compare against Marketing Science for quantitative modeling, Journal of Marketing for strategic managerial contribution, Journal of Consumer Research for consumer-theory depth; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
- Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open
resources/official-source-map.mdfor volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.
Output format
[Target] JMR
[Abstract] <=200 words, third person, states contribution: pass/fix
[Citations] AMA author-year: pass/fix
[Numbers] 3-digit p, no leading zero, <=3 decimals, effect sizes: pass/fix
[Argument] front-loaded, research-first (not managerial): pass/fix
[AI disclosure] present if used
[Next skill] jmr-submission