Jole review process
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jole-review-processAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use to understand how the Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) actually reviews a paper — single-blind refereeing, the non-refundable submission fee, Editorial Manager, the SOLE society tie, and what labor referees expect. Explains the process; it does not draft the manuscript.
SKILL.md
4.7 KB, 990 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Review Process (jole-review-process)
When to trigger
- You are unsure whether JOLE is double-blind (it is not) and how that changes the submission
- You need to budget for the submission fee and understand when the decision is released
- You want to know what labor-economics referees and editors look for before you submit
- You are calibrating expectations for an R&R versus a reject
How JOLE review works
- Single-blind (single-anonymized). Referees are anonymous, but they know the authors' identities. Because of this the manuscript is not anonymized: it begins with a title page naming all co-authors, their institutions, and emails, and references are not blinded. Do not strip identifying material — that is correct for double-blind journals but wrong here.
- Submission via Editorial Manager (
editorialmanager.com/jole), with a cover letter. JOLE is the official journal of the Society of Labor Economists (SOLE) and is published by the University of Chicago Press. - Non-refundable submission fee (since July 1, 2018): $100 for SOLE members, $175 for non-members. It is charged even if the paper is desk-rejected, and the decision is not released until the fee is paid — so the fee gates your result, not just your submission. SOLE membership is the cheaper path.
- Publication-ethics regime: UChicago Press / COPE guidelines, with explicit attention to confidential data and research on vulnerable / human subjects. Flag proprietary data or human-subjects concerns up front.
- Review clock: do not promise the author a specific turnaround time; this pack has no current official review-clock source encoded.
- Editor: the current Editor-in-Chief is Peter Kuhn, UC Santa Barbara. Confirm the live board page before naming any editor or conflict in a cover letter.
What labor referees expect
JOLE referees are labor economists judging a general-interest labor audience. They reward:
- A first-order labor question (wages/earnings, employment, human capital, labor supply/demand, family, discrimination, unions, migration, institutions/policy) that matters beyond one niche.
- Credible identification matched to labor data (DID / event study with modern estimators, IV including shift-share, RDD at eligibility thresholds, RCTs, AKM firm–worker designs).
- Disciplined data work — appropriate sample construction from CPS/ACS/registers, correct standard errors, robustness that a labor referee would otherwise demand.
- A replicable empirical core — JOLE publishes empirical/simulation/experimental papers only if data are documented and available, with deposit to the JOLE Dataverse after acceptance (see jole-replication-and-data-policy).
- Word economy — the ~20,000-word soft cap (full-page exhibit = 500 words) signals that referees value a tightly argued paper, not a sprawling one.
Checklist
- Manuscript is non-anonymized (single-blind): title page names all authors
- Submission fee budgeted; you know the decision is withheld until it is paid
- SOLE membership considered (lower fee)
- Proprietary-data / human-subjects issues flagged to the editor at submission
- Identification and robustness pre-empt the obvious labor-referee objections
- Live board checked before naming an editor or conflict
Anti-patterns
- Treating JOLE as double-blind and stripping author identity from the manuscript
- Forgetting the fee blocks the decision, then being surprised no result arrives
- Promising a specific review turnaround
- Naming an editor or conflict without checking the live board page
- Submitting an empirical paper with no plan to make the data available
Output format
【Review model】single-blind, manuscript NOT anonymized [confirmed Y/N]
【Fee】$100 SOLE / $175 non-member, non-refundable, gates the decision [budgeted Y/N]
【Society】SOLE membership considered for lower fee [Y/N]
【Ethics】proprietary data / human subjects flagged [Y/N/NA]
【Referee readiness】labor question + identification + replication ready [Y/N each]
【Next step】jole-submission preflight
Supplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— official JOLE URLs, source evidence, and live-check items../../resources/external_tools.md— labor data sources and packages