Jie data analysis
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jie-data-analysisAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when building or auditing the empirical analysis for a Journal of International Economics (JIE) manuscript — constructing bilateral trade panels, estimating PPML gravity, running open-economy panels and local projections, calibrating/estimating structural models, and producing the robustness suite international-economics referees expect. Strengthens the analysis; it does not fabricate results.
SKILL.md
7.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Data Analysis (jie-data-analysis)
When to trigger
- Assembling a bilateral trade panel or a cross-country macro/finance panel
- Choosing the gravity estimator and fixed-effect structure
- Deciding which robustness checks an international-economics referee will demand
- Disciplining a structural open-economy or trade model against the data
Empirical norms at JIE
JIE referees come from international trade or international macro/finance and apply that field's conventions. Match them.
Data construction
- Trade: build bilateral product-level flows from UN Comtrade or the cleaned BACI (CEPII); merge gravity covariates from the CEPII Gravity database (distance, contiguity, common language, RTAs); tariffs/NTMs from WITS/TRAINS or WTO. Keep zeros — they are informative and PPML uses them.
- International macro/finance: assemble panels from IMF IFS/BOP/DOTS, BIS, the External Wealth of Nations (Lane–Milesi-Ferretti), Penn World Table; sovereign-debt/default histories from established crisis datasets.
Estimation
- Gravity → PPML (
ppmlhdfe,fixest::fepois) with importer×time, exporter×time, and pair fixed effects; report the trade elasticity. - Cross-country macro panels → fixed effects with care for dynamic-panel bias (
xtabond2/xtdpdgmmwhere lagged dependent variables matter); cluster appropriately. - Dynamics → local projections (
lpirf) for pass-through and impulse responses; VAR/BVAR where warranted. - Structural → solve and calibrate/estimate (Dynare for DSGE; exact-hat algebra for trade counterfactuals); report targeted and untargeted moments.
Robustness suite (referees will ask)
- Alternative fixed-effect structures and samples; alternative trade-cost proxies.
- Sensitivity to the trade elasticity (and, for macro, to risk aversion / discount factor).
- Modern DID estimators if any staggered policy timing is involved.
- Design-based inference for shift-share exposure; multi-way clustering for dyadic data.
- Counterfactual robustness to the elasticities that cannot be pinned down precisely.
Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
Run the battery, don't just enumerate it. Full map:
execution-with-mcp. JIE is international trade/macro; cross-country/firm panels — emphasize identification and clustering.
- Many outcomes / specifications:
romano_wolf(step-down FWER) orbenjamini_hochberg. - OVB sensitivity:
oster_delta/sensemakr. - Inference:
wild_cluster_bootstrap(few clusters),twoway_cluster/conley. - Re-fit off one handle:
audit_result(result_id)lists missing checks + the exactsuggest_functionfor each. - Exhibits:
etable/did_summary_to_latexfrom the handle — no retyped numbers.
Decisive checks in the body, exhaustive battery in the appendix. JF execution walkthrough.
Checklist
- Data sources documented and merge keys (ISO country, HS product, year) clean
- Zeros retained for gravity; PPML used with multilateral-resistance FE
- Estimator matched to data structure (dyadic, dynamic panel, time series, structural)
- Inference matched to the design (multi-way / design-based / cluster-robust)
- Economic magnitudes (elasticities, welfare, pass-through) reported, not just significance
- Robustness to key elasticities and specifications shown
- Every number traceable to a script for the replication deposit
Anti-patterns
- Log-OLS gravity dropping zeros (biased per Santos Silva–Tenreyro)
- Single-clustered standard errors on dyadic trade data
- A structural model matched to one moment and declared validated
- Reporting stars without the trade/welfare/pass-through magnitude
- Ad hoc analysis with no script trail, breaking the mandatory replication deposit later
Referee-pushback patterns and the JIE-specific fix
The objections an international-economics referee raises most, with the move that resolves each. Each maps to a concrete change in the empirical section.
- "Gravity estimates without multilateral resistance / still on log-OLS." Fix: re-estimate with PPML (
ppmlhdfe/fepois), importer×time and exporter×time fixed effects, pair fixed effects for policy effects; keep zeros; report the elasticity, not just significance. - "Trade-policy variable is endogenous — RTAs form where trade is already growing." Fix: pair fixed effects to absorb time-invariant selection, pre-trend event study, phase-in/anticipation modelled, and a falsification on flows the policy should not touch.
- "Shift-share exposure may proxy a local trend." Fix: state whether identification rests on exogenous shares or shifts, use Adao–Kolesar–Morales or Borusyak–Hull–Jaravel inference, and show exposure is uncorrelated with pre-period trends.
- "Quantitative model is not disciplined by the data." Fix: tabulate targeted vs untargeted moments, report counterfactuals under a range of trade elasticities, and show the headline result is not an artifact of one un-pinned-down parameter.
- "Inference ignores dyadic dependence." Fix: multi-way (exporter and importer) clustering, not a single cluster dimension.
Worked micro-example (illustrative numbers)
A gravity panel of bilateral manufacturing trade, 60 countries × 20 years, asking whether an RTA raises members' trade. Log-OLS on positive flows returns an RTA coefficient of, say, 0.55 (about a 73% increase). Re-estimating in PPML with importer×time, exporter×time, and pair fixed effects — retaining the ~30% of dyad-years with zero trade — the coefficient falls to roughly 0.20 (about 22%). That drop is the textbook Santos Silva–Tenreyro pattern: log-OLS over-weighted small positive flows and discarded informative zeros. Multi-way clustering on exporter and importer widens the standard error enough that the honest takeaway is "a modest, precisely-bounded RTA effect," not the inflated log-OLS number. (Figures illustrative, chosen to show the mechanism.)
Output format
【Data】sources + unit (dyad-year / country-year / firm-year)
【Estimator】PPML+FE / dynamic panel / local projection / structural
【Inference】multi-way / design-based / cluster-robust
【Magnitudes】[elasticity / welfare / pass-through reported]
【Robustness done】[FE structures, elasticity sensitivity, modern DID, ...]
【Robustness missing】[...]
【Next step】jie-contribution-framing or jie-tables-figures
Supplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— Comtrade/BACI/CEPII/WITS, IMF/BIS/EWN/PWT data +ppmlhdfe/fepois/Dynare toolkits../../resources/official-source-map.md— scope and data-policy sources