Jebo replication package
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jebo-replication-packageAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when assembling the data, code, and experimental-materials deposit for a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript — z-Tree/oTree code, instructions, raw and analysis data, and an Elsevier Research Data / Mendeley Data statement. Builds a reproducible package; it does not run the analysis.
SKILL.md
4.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Replication & Materials Package (jebo-replication-package)
When to trigger
- The analysis is settled and you must assemble what others need to reproduce it
- An experiment is done but the instructions and z-Tree/oTree code are not yet packaged
- A referee or editor asks where the data and code are
- You are writing the Elsevier "data availability" / Research Data statement
- An agent-based model's runnable code and seeds are not yet organized for sharing
JEBO's reproducibility posture
JEBO follows the Elsevier Research Data policy: data and code sharing is strongly encouraged (via Mendeley Data or a linked repository) but not currently a hard pre-acceptance gate the way the AEA Data Editor or the Econometric Society's pre-acceptance check are (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). In practice, for an experimental journal, referees increasingly expect the full materials, and a credible deposit strengthens acceptance. Treat the package as part of the contribution, not an afterthought.
The distinctive JEBO requirement is experimental reproducibility: a reader must be able to re-run your experiment, not just your regressions. That means the instructions, the screen-by-screen protocol, and the experiment software are first-class deposit items.
What the package must contain
| Item | Detail JEBO referees look for |
|---|---|
| Experiment instructions | full participant-facing text (translated to English if run in another language), including comprehension questions |
| Experiment software | z-Tree .ztt / oTree app code, or the platform code, runnable with setup notes |
| Screenshots / protocol | session protocol, screen flow, randomization procedure, payment scheme |
| Raw data | subject-level raw output (anonymized), with a codebook |
| Analysis code | scripts that go from raw data to every table/figure, with a master run file |
| Software environment | versions (Stata/R/Python, z-Tree/oTree), packages, seeds for any simulation |
| README | one-command (or clearly-ordered) reproduction path; maps each script to each exhibit |
| Pre-registration link | registry URL + a note on deviations, if pre-registered |
| Ethics / consent | IRB/ethics approval reference; consent procedure |
For agent-based / simulation papers, the deposit is the model code, parameter files, seeds, and the sweep scripts that regenerate the reported figures.
Privacy and anonymization
Strip direct identifiers from raw subject data; for field data, follow consent and data-protection constraints and document any access restrictions. State clearly if data cannot be shared and why (Elsevier allows a justified restricted-access statement).
The data-availability statement
Write the Elsevier "Data availability" statement to match reality: a Mendeley Data DOI / repository link, or a justified statement of restriction. Vague statements ("data available on request") are weak and increasingly disfavored; deposit where possible.
Checklist
- Experiment instructions (English) + comprehension questions included
- z-Tree/oTree or platform code included and runnable, with setup notes
- Session protocol, screen flow, randomization, and payment scheme documented
- Raw subject-level data (anonymized) + codebook
- Analysis scripts reproduce every table/figure from raw data via a master file
- Software versions, packages, and seeds recorded
- README maps each script to each exhibit; reproduction path is explicit
- Pre-registration link + deviations noted (if applicable); IRB/consent referenced
- Data-availability statement points to a real deposit (Mendeley Data) or a justified restriction
Anti-patterns
- Sharing analysis code but not the experiment software/instructions (cannot re-run the experiment)
- "Data available on request" with no deposit
- Raw data with direct identifiers left in
- A README that lists files but never gives the reproduction order
- Simulation results with no seeds or sweep scripts
- Claiming pre-registration without linking the registry or disclosing deviations
Output format
【Deposit location】Mendeley Data DOI / repository link / justified restriction
【Experiment materials】instructions + z-Tree/oTree code + protocol [Y/N]
【Data】raw (anonymized) + codebook [Y/N]
【Code】master run file → every exhibit; versions + seeds recorded [Y/N]
【README】explicit reproduction path mapping script→exhibit [Y/N]
【Pre-reg + ethics】registry link + deviations; IRB/consent [Y/N / n.a.]
【Next step】jebo-referee-strategy