agentsclimarketplace

Joe topic selection

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Journal-of-Econometrics-Skills/skills/joe-topic-selection

Use when deciding whether a project is a genuine methodological contribution for the Journal of Econometrics (JoE) versus a purely applied result better placed elsewhere. Pressure-tests the idea against JoE's theory-plus-applied-methods scope before months are spent.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joe-topic-selection

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

4.7 KB, 947 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Methodological Topic Selection (joe-topic-selection)

When to trigger

  • You have an empirical finding and wonder if there is a "methods paper" inside it
  • You have a new estimator/test but are unsure it clears a top methodology bar
  • You cannot state in one sentence what econometric problem the paper solves
  • You are unsure whether JoE, a field journal, or a pure-theory venue is the right home

The JoE scope bar

The Journal of Econometrics (Elsevier, founded 1973) publishes substantive contributions to econometric methodology — identification, estimation, testing, decision, and prediction problems arising in economic research, plus applications of econometric techniques to economics. The strong house norm is a methodological advance with mathematical rigor (a new estimator, test, identification result, or asymptotic theory, with proofs and/or asymptotic derivations). Purely empirical or applied work without a methodological contribution is typically out of scope. At the other end, pure statistical theory with no econometric/economic motivation may be steered toward more theory-oriented or statistics venues (companion Elsevier outlets such as Econometrics and Statistics overlap in scope).

So the test is two-sided. Ask:

  1. What econometric problem does this solve? Name the estimand, the failure of existing methods, and why it matters for economic data (e.g., endogeneity, weak identification, nonstationarity, high dimensionality, clustered/dependent data, heterogeneity).
  2. Is the advance real? A better estimator (efficiency, robustness, weaker assumptions), a new test with proven size/power properties, a new identification result, or new asymptotics — not a relabeling of a known method.
  3. Is there an economic anchor? JoE prizes methods motivated by and useful for economics, ideally with an empirical illustration, not abstract statistics.

Three submission tracks shape topic fit

  • Regular Issues — standalone methodological papers (the default).
  • Annals Issues — focused volumes on a coherent theme.
  • Themed Issues — topic-based collections, often conference-originated, where proposers may serve as Guest Associate Editors. If your work fits an active theme, that route can be a strong fit; check the live Themes page for current calls.

Decision shortcuts

  • "I have a result but the method is standard" → not JoE; target a field journal
  • "I have a new estimator but no economic problem behind it" → tighten the motivation or target a statistics venue
  • "New test + proven properties + economic application" → strong JoE fit → joe-literature-positioning
  • "Pure proof, no application, very abstract" → consider a theory venue; for JoE, add an econometric anchor and illustration

Anti-patterns

  • Dressing an applied paper as methods with a thin "we also propose an estimator" section
  • A method with no asymptotic theory and no Monte Carlo — JoE expects both
  • Ignoring the closest existing estimator and overclaiming novelty

Fit pass for Journal of Econometrics

Use this as a second-pass capability check. First lock the estimand or theorem, assumptions, asymptotic/simulation evidence, and applied relevance; then test whether the manuscript addresses econometrics reviewers who expect methodological novelty, assumptions, simulation or empirical illustration, and reproducibility.

  • Primary move: Score fit, novelty, evidence readiness, and audience ownership; reject prestige-only targeting when a sibling venue owns the contribution.
  • Decision ledger: return claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.
  • Neighbor test: compare against Econometric Theory for proof-first work, JBES for applied statistical methods, Quantitative Economics for economics-theory methods; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
  • Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.

Output format

【Econometric problem】one sentence
【Existing methods & their failure】...
【Proposed advance】estimator / test / identification / asymptotics
【Economic anchor / illustration】...
【Track】Regular / Annals / Themed
【Verdict】JoE fit / field journal / theory venue
【Next step】joe-literature-positioning

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.