Jde workflow
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jde-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when deciding which jde-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Development Economics (JDE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
SKILL.md
6.2 KB, ~1.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
JDE Workflow Router (jde-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill. It tells you which jde- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the Journal of Development Economics.
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as JDE — the leading field journal in development economics, published by Elsevier and edited by Editors-in-Chief A. Foster and K. Macours. It is highly selective: roughly 1,300 submissions a year, only about a quarter sent for review, and roughly 6-8% published. Submission is via Editorial Manager under single-anonymized review, with a USD 50 non-refundable submission fee for original manuscripts. JDE has three distinctive routes: a permanent pre-results review / Registered Reports track (run with BITSS), an AER: Insights-style short-paper limited-revision track, and a standard full-length track — plus a three-papers-per-author-per-12-months cap and a mandatory replication / Option C data-policy regime.
When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?"
- The user hands over a draft and needs the current bottleneck diagnosed
- Work is ping-ponging between empirics, framing, writing, and response letters
- A JDE decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
- The user is deciding between the full-length, short-paper, and pre-results routes
Routing table
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Idea feels small / not clearly a development-economics contribution | jde-topic-selection |
| Contribution relative to the development literature is fuzzy | jde-literature-positioning |
| The "so what for development" is undersold or buried | jde-contribution-framing |
| Empirics rest on OLS + controls; causal claim undefended | jde-identification-strategy |
| Estimation, heterogeneity, attrition, or inference choices are shaky | jde-data-analysis |
| Tables are dense; paper is not figure-forward enough | jde-tables-figures |
| Prose buries the idea; abstract/intro do not land the question | jde-writing-style |
| Need the data/code deposit, or pre-empting referee replication | jde-replication-and-data-policy |
| Unsure how JDE review works (routes, timelines, single-anonymized) | jde-review-process |
| Ready to submit via Editorial Manager; need a preflight checklist | jde-submission |
| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy | jde-rebuttal |
Default order
jde-topic-selection— lock a first-order development questionjde-literature-positioning— stake the contribution against the development frontierjde-contribution-framing— make the development takeaway explicitjde-identification-strategy— make the causal design credible in an LMIC settingjde-data-analysis— estimation, heterogeneity, attrition, inferencejde-tables-figures— finalize figure-forward exhibitsjde-writing-style— polish prose (abstract + intro last)jde-replication-and-data-policy— assemble the Mendeley Data depositjde-review-process— pick the right route and understand the pipelinejde-submission— Editorial Manager preflightjde-rebuttal— after the R&R
If your design is prospective, route to
jde-review-processearly — the pre-results review track reviews and accepts the design before results exist.
Worked routing example (illustrative)
A user arrives with a fielded cluster-randomized agricultural-extension trial, results in hand, and an unfocused draft. Diagnose the bottleneck before sequencing:
- The causal design is sound (randomized at the village level), so skip ahead of
jde-identification-strategyexcept to confirm clustering and attrition. - The draft reports coefficients but no development lesson → the live bottleneck is
jde-contribution-framing, thenjde-literature-positioningto stake the increment. - Because the result is sharp and self-contained (~5,000 words, illustrative), flag the short-paper route early via
jde-review-processso the team writes to the 6,000-word / 5-exhibit cap rather than over-building. - Only after framing and identification settle should
jde-tables-figuresandjde-writing-stylepolish.
Stage-to-symptom quick map
| Stage symptom | Route to |
|---|---|
| "Is this even a development paper?" | jde-topic-selection |
| "Results exist but the lesson is fuzzy" | jde-contribution-framing |
| "A referee will call the design weak" | jde-identification-strategy |
| "An R&R letter just arrived" | jde-rebuttal |
| "Design not yet fielded" | jde-review-process (pre-results) |
Router output
【Current stage】topic / framing / identification / analysis / exhibits / writing / replication / review / submission / rebuttal
【Live bottleneck】one sentence
【Route now to】jde-<skill>
【Route candidate (full-length / short-paper / pre-results)】+ why
【Within 3-per-12-months cap?】[Y/N]
Anti-patterns
- Do not skip
jde-contribution-framing— JDE referees judge the development contribution first - Do not let
jde-tables-figurespolish exhibits while identification is still shaky - Do not treat
jde-replication-and-data-policyas optional — data/code can be requested at the review stage - Do not submit a fourth paper inside a 12-month window — the cap is enforced
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.