Jbf topic selection
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包，从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程，助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jbf-topic-selectionAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when deciding whether an empirical or theoretical finance manuscript fits the Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF) scope, especially banking, financial intermediation, financial institutions, capital markets, investments, corporate finance, or financial regulation.
SKILL.md
4.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Topic Selection (jbf-topic-selection)
When to trigger
- A finance paper could go to JBF, JFI, JCF, JFQA, RFS, or a field journal and you need a fit call
- The project is about banks, intermediaries, regulation, liquidity, credit, investments, or capital markets
- You need to decide whether the paper is strong enough for JBF or should be routed elsewhere
JBF fit bar
JBF is not a generic "any finance paper" outlet. It rewards papers that make a clear contribution to banking, financial intermediation, institutions, markets, investments, corporate finance, or regulation. A good JBF topic usually has:
- A finance question with institutional content: banks, lenders, funds, markets, regulation, disclosure, risk-taking, liquidity, credit supply, or capital allocation.
- A credible design or model: empirical identification, careful data construction, or a theoretical mechanism with testable implications.
- External relevance: implications for financial institutions, investors, regulators, or corporate financing decisions.
- A result that changes a finance reader's prior rather than only adding a new sample, country, or dataset.
Strong fits
- Bank capital, liquidity, risk-taking, supervision, stress tests, or credit supply
- Financial intermediation, shadow banking, fintech lending, syndicated loans
- Market liquidity, trading, asset pricing with institutional frictions
- Corporate finance questions where banks or financing constraints are central
- Regulation/policy shocks with clear finance mechanisms
Weak fits
- Pure accounting, management, macro, or development papers where finance is only context
- Asset-pricing factor papers with no JBF-specific institutional contribution
- Country case studies without credible identification or generalizable finance insight
- Routine event studies without an economic mechanism
Neighbor-venue routing matrix
| Paper profile | Better-first venue | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediation theory or structural banking model with a tight mechanism | Journal of Financial Intermediation | narrower, mechanism-first intermediation outlet |
| Systemic risk / macroprudential policy evaluation | Journal of Financial Stability | stability-policy core audience |
| Monetary transmission through banks, macro-banking | JMCB | money-macro referee pool |
| Corporate finance where banks are peripheral | Journal of Corporate Finance | firm-side audience |
| Broad empirical banking/markets/regulation with solid identification and a policy angle | JBF | wide empirical scope, bank-focused readership |
These are stylized scope contrasts; check each journal's current aims-and-scope before final routing.
Worked fit call (illustrative)
Candidate question: "Do BNPL fintech lenders substitute for credit-card lending by small banks?"
- Institutional content: yes — nonbank entry into consumer credit and the bank funding response; fit bar 1 passes.
- Design: staggered fintech entry across local markets with bank × market data; passes only if entry timing is defensibly exogenous (route to
jbf-identification-strategy). - Prior-changing: if the answer is "entry cuts incumbent card balances by an illustrative 6%," it shifts priors on fintech substitution versus market expansion — JBF-relevant.
- Verdict: strong JBF fit; JFI only if the paper builds a substitution model first.
Two-minute screening questions
- Which intermediation friction sits at the center: capital, liquidity, information, competition, or regulation?
- Would a bank supervisor, risk officer, or lender change a decision given the result?
- Does the design produce a magnitude in finance units (basis points, percentage points of assets) a referee can benchmark?
- Is there a JBF-relevant strand where this is the next paper rather than a duplicate?
Answer all four before routing onward; a "no" on question 1 or 4 usually means reroute rather than rewrite.
Scope-based desk risks
- Banking data used to answer a labor, IO, or development question → desk risk: the finance mechanism is incidental.
- A single-country banking-crisis case study without generalizable variation → desk risk unless the institutional setting isolates a mechanism.
- A risk-model horse race with no intermediation or policy stake → reroute, or add an economic application before submitting.
Output format
[Question] one sentence
[JBF fit] strong / possible / weak
[Core finance mechanism] ...
[Evidence or model needed] ...
[Closest alternatives] JFI / JCF / JFQA / field journal / other
[Next step] jbf-literature-positioning or reroute