Isr methods
Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Information-Systems-Research-Skills/skills/isr-methods
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill isr-methodsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when choosing and stress-testing the research design for an Information Systems Research (ISR) manuscript — matching the genre (behavioral empirical, analytical-economic modeling, design-science, or multimethod) to the question, and ensuring the design can actually support the IS contribution. Designs the study; it does not execute the estimation/derivation (isr-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (isr-contribution-framing).
SKILL.md
5.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Research Design & Method Fit (isr-methods)
When to trigger
- You are unsure which genre best supports your IS claim
- The design may not be able to identify the effect (empirical) or may rest on unjustified assumptions (analytical)
- You are combining methods and need the multimethod logic to hold together
- A reviewer says "the method cannot answer the question" or "the artifact is not evaluated"
Match the genre to the claim
ISR is deliberately pluralistic; no single method is mandated. Choose the genre the claim demands:
| Claim / phenomenon | Genre & design |
|---|---|
| Causal effect of an IT design/policy on behavior or outcomes | Field/lab experiment, or quasi-experiment with identification |
| How/why IT use is enacted, appropriated, organized | Qualitative / interpretive (interviews, ethnography, case) |
| Equilibrium behavior of platforms, pricing, security, contracts | Analytical economic / game-theoretic model |
| A novel IT artifact that solves a class of problems | Design science — build and rigorous evaluation |
| Value/impact of IT investment at firm/market level | Archival econometrics with a credible identification strategy |
| Mechanism + scope + generalization in one paper | Multimethod (per ISR 36(2) framework) with an explicit integration logic |
Genre-specific design discipline
- Behavioral empirical. Establish construct validity by design (multi-item validated scales, manipulation/attention checks), separate sources/waves to limit common-method bias, justify the sampling frame, and (for experiments) pre-register and power for interactions, not just main effects.
- Analytical modeling. The design is the model: state agents, timing, information structure, and equilibrium concept; defend each assumption; plan the comparative statics and the extensions/robustness that show the result is not an artifact of one assumption. Reserve full proofs for the electronic companion.
- Design science. Specify the artifact, the design objectives, and an evaluation that demonstrates utility (benchmarks, controlled studies, real-world deployment) — a build without evaluation is not a DSR contribution.
- Archival/causal. Name the identification strategy (DiD, IV, RDD, matching) and the threat it addresses; a regression without identification is descriptive.
Sociotechnical level and fit
State the level(s) of analysis and ensure the design observes the level where the mechanism operates (e.g., group-level theory needs group-level variation). Cross-level claims need cross-level data.
Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
For the empirical / causal lane, estimate and audit rather than only specify. Full
map: execution-with-mcp. ISR is empirical IS with strong econometric and experimental work; identification (DiD / IV) for observational claims, randomization inference for experiments.
detect_design→recommend→ fit withas_handle=true→audit_resultto enumerate the checks the design owes.- Panel / staggered DiD:
callaway_santanna/sun_abraham+bacon_decompositionhonest_did_from_result. IV:effective_f_test+anderson_rubin_ci. RDD:rdrobust+mccrary_test.
- Experiments: randomization-based inference and
romano_wolffor the many-outcome family-wise correction reviewers expect.
Match the toolchain to the reviewer pool, and report the effect size the venue wants. A run end-to-end (synthetic data, real returns) is in the JF execution walkthrough.
Checklist
- Genre matches the claim; not chosen by habit or data availability
- Empirical: identification/validity strategy named and adequate
- Analytical: assumptions justified; comparative statics and robustness planned
- DSR: artifact + evaluation that demonstrates utility
- Level(s) of analysis observed where the mechanism operates
- Multimethod combinations have an explicit integration logic (ISR 36(2))
- Page budget planned (32-page text cap) with overflow routed to the electronic companion
Anti-patterns
- Method by convenience: using the data you have rather than the design the claim needs.
- Regression theater: archival regressions presented as causal without identification.
- Build-only DSR: an artifact with no rigorous evaluation.
- Multimethod garnish: a second method bolted on without theoretical integration.
Output format
【Claim】[...]
【Genre & design】experiment / qualitative / analytical / DSR / archival / multimethod
【Identification or assumptions】[...]
【Level(s) observed】[...]
【Validity/robustness plan】[...]
【Page/EC budget】[...]
【Next step】isr-data-analysis