agentsclimarketplace

Icassp submission

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/ICASSP-Skills/skills/icassp-submission

Use when auditing an ICASSP submission before the CMS portal deadline — the IEEE 4+1 page format, the single-blind rule that the author list must appear, EDICS subject selection, the Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement, PDF eXpress validation, the 9-papers-per-author cap, dual-submission policy, and desk-reject triggers.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icassp-submission

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

5.2 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

ICASSP Submission

Run this audit against the live ICASSP paper kit on the current-year CMS portal (cmsworkshops.com/ICASSP<year>/papers.php), not against memory. ICASSP reissues its kit each cycle, and because the whole review pipeline assumes a uniform IEEE two-column object, the format is checked mechanically at upload. The next major gate as of 2026-07-09 is the ICASSP 2027 full-paper deadline, reported ~16 September 2026 — verify on the live 2027 call.

The format contract: 4 + 1

An ICASSP regular paper is 4 pages of technical content — text, figures, and references all count — with an optional 5th page that may hold only references, funding acknowledgements, and the Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statement. Consequences to internalize:

  • There is no reviewed appendix or supplement that decides acceptance. Whatever a reviewer must see to accept the paper lives on the four content pages.
  • References compete with content on pages 1-4 unless they spill to page 5; plan the reference budget early.
  • Use the official IEEE two-column template from the paper kit with fonts, margins, and column measure untouched, and confirm the PDF passes IEEE PDF eXpress before the portal will accept it.

Single-blind: the inverted anonymity rule

ICASSP review is single-blind. Unlike OpenReview or ISCA venues, you must include the author list and affiliations in the submitted PDF; reviewers see who you are, you do not see them. The failure mode here is the opposite of an identity leak:

  • A missing or wrong author block is the defect to catch, not a self-citation.
  • Write self-citations in normal first person ("in our earlier work [4]"); no anonymization gymnastics are needed.
  • Acknowledgements and funding are allowed and belong on page 5, not hidden.

Portal and metadata (CMS, not CMT)

  • Submission is through Conference Management Services (CMS) at cmsworkshops.com, not Microsoft CMT and not OpenReview — a genuine ICASSP fingerprint.
  • Choose the EDICS subject category that routes the paper to the correct technical committee; the routing decision comes from icassp-topic-selection, not from whoever uploads.
  • The CMS abstract must match the PDF abstract; it is what area organizers read.
  • No single author may appear on more than 9 papers in a cycle — check co-author load early.
  • Answer the dual-submission attestation honestly: the same work may not be under review at another conference or journal simultaneously.

Desk-reject and triage table

TriggerSeverity at ICASSPRepair window
Fifth page carrying content beyond references/acks/ethicsDesk rejectNone after deadline
Template tampering caught by PDF eXpressDesk rejectNone
Missing author list (single-blind requires it)Non-compliant submissionOnly before deadline
Missing Compliance-with-Ethical-Standards statementCompliance flagOnly before deadline
Author on more than 9 papersEnforced capWithdraw one before deadline
Dual submission to another venueIntegrity violationNone

Final 72 hours, in order

  1. Rebuild the PDF from a clean clone; confirm the paper-kit template version is current and PDF eXpress passes.
  2. Confirm the author block, affiliations, and page-5 acknowledgements/ethics statement are present and correct — the single-blind checklist.
  3. Verify every figure is legible at print resolution and no float pushes past four pages.
  4. Set EDICS and the CMS abstract to match the PDF; declare all co-authors and their conflicts.
  5. Upload, download what CMS stored, and read that file end to end.

Track choice before you submit

  • Standard track — 4+1 pages, TPC review, proceedings in IEEE Xplore.
  • OJSP-ICASSP — 8+1 pages, reviewed by the Open Journal of Signal Processing board, open-access publication, presented but not in the proceedings (earlier pre-registration deadline).
  • SPS-journal presentation — present a recently accepted SPS-journal paper, not re-reviewed, not in proceedings.

Confirm each track's separate deadline in the current call; see icassp-workflow.

Output format

[Submission verdict] ready / fixable / not ready
[Format] 4+1 compliance, template integrity, PDF eXpress result
[Single-blind] author list present, affiliations, page-5 acks/ethics
[Metadata] EDICS, abstract match, author list, dual-submission answer, 9-paper cap
[Track] standard / OJSP-ICASSP / journal-presentation / grand-challenge
[Blockers] <ordered list>

Currency note

The 4+1 format, single-blind policy, CMS portal, and 9-paper cap were checked 2026-07-09 against ICASSP 2026 (Barcelona) renderings (see ../../resources/official-source-map.md). Every value is cycle-specific; the ICASSP 2027 Toronto cycle publishes its own kit and calendar — re-open it.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.