Geb workflow
Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Games-and-Economic-Behavior-Skills/skills/geb-workflow
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill geb-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when deciding which geb-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
SKILL.md
6.1 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
GEB Workflow Router (geb-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill. It tells you which geb- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at Games and Economic Behavior (GEB).
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as GEB — the leading specialist game-theory journal, published by Elsevier and an official journal of the Game Theory Society (founded 1989 by Ehud Kalai; chief editor Hervé Moulin since 2021). GEB judges work on whether it advances the frontiers of game theory and its applications — theory, mechanism design, behavioral, and experiments — not general-economics interest alone. Its process is distinctive: the chief editor assigns each paper to one of seven Editors (your publicly known "Editor in Charge"), who routes it to an anonymous Advisory Editor and anonymous referees. About one-third of submissions are desk-rejected and only ~15% are eventually published. Re-verify volatile specifics (chief editor, the seven Editors, abstract cap, fees) on the official Guide for Authors; several are marked 待核实 in the source map.
When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?"
- The user hands over a draft and needs the current bottleneck diagnosed
- Work is ping-ponging between theory, experiment, writing, and response letters
- A GEB decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
Routing table
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Result feels incremental / unclear it advances game theory itself | geb-topic-selection |
| Relation to the game-theory literature is fuzzy or undersold | geb-literature-positioning |
| The "so what for game theory" sentence is missing | geb-contribution-framing |
| Proofs are opaque, or assumptions/generality are under-examined | geb-identification-strategy |
| Experimental data / numerical examples need analysis or are under-powered | geb-data-analysis |
| Game trees, payoff matrices, or result tables are unclear | geb-tables-figures |
| Prose buries the model; abstract is over 250 words | geb-writing-style |
| Need a data/code-sharing plan (encouraged, not required at GEB) | geb-replication-and-data-policy |
| Want to understand the Editor-in-Charge review path before submitting | geb-review-process |
| Ready to submit via Editorial Manager; need a preflight + cover letter | geb-submission |
| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy | geb-rebuttal |
Default order
geb-topic-selection— confirm the result advances game theory itselfgeb-literature-positioning— locate it against the game-theory frontiergeb-contribution-framing— state the one-sentence contribution to the fieldgeb-identification-strategy— assumptions, results, proof exposition, generalitygeb-data-analysis— experimental analysis / verified numerical examplesgeb-tables-figures— game trees, payoff matrices, clean result exhibitsgeb-writing-style— land the model for a general game-theory reader (abstract ≤250 words)geb-replication-and-data-policy— optional but recommended sharing plangeb-review-process— understand the Editor-in-Charge pathgeb-submission— Editorial Manager preflight + conference-version cover lettergeb-rebuttal— after the R&R
geb-writing-styleis a late-stage polish. Do not rewrite the introduction before the theorems and assumptions are settled — the statements will change.
Stage log
Keep this log with the manuscript and update it after each working pass; the first unresolved line is your route:
GEB stage log (✓ = settled, ? = open — first ? wins)
contribution one-line advance to game theory written out verbatim ..... [?]
positioning nearest frontier papers named + what you generalize ...... [?]
results theorems stated, assumptions listed, proofs readable ..... [?]
evidence experiment powered / numerical examples verified ......... [?]
exhibits game trees and payoff matrices self-contained ............ [?]
prose abstract ≤250 words; model reachable within intro ........ [?]
sharing data/code plan drafted (encouraged, not required) ........ [?]
process Editor-in-Charge path + desk-reject risks reviewed ....... [?]
submit Editorial Manager preflight; conference version flagged .. [?]
--- decision letter in hand? ignore every line above → geb-rebuttal ---
- "Is this big enough for GEB?" →
geb-topic-selection - "Who am I building on / generalizing?" →
geb-literature-positioning - "My proof is correct but unreadable" →
geb-identification-strategy - "My experiment may be under-powered" →
geb-data-analysis - "My abstract is 320 words" →
geb-writing-style - "There's a conference version of this paper" →
geb-submission - "Who actually decides on my paper?" →
geb-review-process - "I got a revise-and-resubmit" →
geb-rebuttal
Anti-patterns
- Do not skip
geb-contribution-framingand submit a technically-correct result with no stated advance to game theory — desk-reject risk - Do not polish exhibits while the main theorem's assumptions are still moving
- Do not treat GEB like a general-economics top-5: the bar is advancing game theory, not broad policy interest
- Do not let
geb-rebuttaldraft a response letter before the revised manuscript exists
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.