Eer tables figures
Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/European-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/eer-tables-figures
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eer-tables-figuresAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when building or revising exhibits for a European Economic Review (EER) manuscript so they report standard errors, read cleanly, and follow Elsevier economics norms. Designs tables and figures; it does not run the estimation or write the surrounding prose.
SKILL.md
5.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Tables & Figures (eer-tables-figures)
When to trigger
- Tables are dense, over-decorated with significance stars, or missing SEs
- Figures are cluttered, lack uncertainty bands, or are not self-explanatory
- A referee said an exhibit is "unreadable" or "buries the result"
- Preparing final editable source files for Elsevier production
The EER exhibits bar
EER follows Elsevier economics house style: a paper is read through its main tables and a few clean figures, each self-contained (legible without the text). The discipline norm is to report standard errors (and, increasingly, confidence intervals) and to let the magnitude carry the result rather than a wall of asterisks. Figures and tables can be embedded for review and are supplied as editable source files at final stage. Aim for fewer, sharper exhibits: the headline result should be findable in one table and one figure.
Table design rules
- One headline table carries the main result; supporting tables are secondary.
- Report SEs (in parentheses) under every coefficient; report N, R²/pseudo-R², and the FE/cluster structure in the notes.
- Magnitudes legible: scale coefficients to interpretable units; add a sentence-ready effect size.
- Significance: report SEs/CIs; if stars are used, do not let them replace the SE or the magnitude — EER norms emphasize the standard error, not the star.
- Notes are complete: sample, period, clustering level, estimator, and what each column varies.
- No redundant digits: 2–3 significant figures; align decimals.
Figure design rules
- Event-study plots with leads/lags and confidence bands are the EER-standard causal exhibit.
- Model-fit overlays (data vs. model moments) for quantitative/structural work.
- Counterfactual / policy curves with uncertainty bands.
- Self-contained captions: a reader should grasp the figure from the caption alone.
- Vector output (
.eps/.pdf) or high-resolution.tif/.jpg; legible fonts; colorblind-safe palettes; avoid chartjunk and 3-D effects.
Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
Generate exhibits from the fitted result, not by retyping numbers. Full map:
execution-with-mcp. EER is a general economics field journal; the DiD/IV/RDD chain serves its applied lane.
- Tables:
etable(multi-model) ordid_summary_to_latexstraight from theresult_id. - Figures:
plot_from_result/enhanced_event_study_plot/event_study_table— axis units and the SE/clustering note baked in. - Every note names the estimator + clustering and states the magnitude in interpretable units.
See a full fitted-result → exhibit chain in the JF execution walkthrough.
Checklist
- One headline table; the main result is findable there
- Standard errors (and/or CIs) under every estimate; N and structure in notes
- Stars (if any) do not substitute for SEs/magnitudes
- Coefficients in interpretable units with a stated effect size
- Event-study/causal figure has leads/lags + confidence bands
- Every exhibit is self-contained (caption + notes legible alone)
- Final figures supplied as editable/vector source at acceptance
- No chartjunk; colorblind-safe; 2–3 significant figures
Anti-patterns
- A table whose only signal is the number of asterisks (no SEs, no magnitude)
- Twelve nearly-identical regression columns where two would do
- Figures with no uncertainty bands or no axis labels
- Captions that require the body text to interpret the exhibit
- Raster screenshots of tables instead of editable source
- Reporting six decimal places of false precision
- Color encodings that fail in grayscale or for colorblind readers
- An appendix figure carrying the headline result the main text never shows
Worked vignette (illustrative)
A labor paper's first draft has a 10-column table dense with stars and no SEs. The EER revision: one headline table (4 columns: baseline, +controls, modern DiD, IV) with SEs in parentheses, clustering noted, and effect sizes spelled out ("a 1 SD increase raises wages 2.3%, s.e. 0.6"); plus one event-study figure with flat leads and a shaded 95% band. The remaining specifications move to the Supplementary material. The result is now findable in ten seconds.
Output format
【Headline table】columns + what each varies; SEs present? [Y/N]
【Reporting】SEs/CIs under estimates; stars not load-bearing? [Y/N]
【Key figure】event-study / fit-overlay / counterfactual + uncertainty bands? [Y/N]
【Self-contained】captions+notes legible alone? [Y/N]
【Final files】editable/vector source ready? [Y/N]
【Next step】eer-writing-style (weave exhibits into the narrative)