agentsclimarketplace

Est workflow

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Environmental-Science-and-Technology-Skills/skills/est-workflow

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill est-workflow

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use as the entry point for any Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) manuscript. Routes to the right ES&T sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (Research Article, Critical Review, Feature, Perspective, Policy Analysis, or the rapid companion ES&T Letters) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

SKILL.md

6.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

ES&T Workflow Router (est-workflow)

The orchestrator for an ES&T submission. Figure out the stage and the article type, then send the user to the matching skill. ES&T is a multidisciplinary environmental science and engineering journal — the router's first job is to make sure the paper carries clear environmental significance, not just a clean lab result.

When to trigger

  • Starting a new ES&T paper and unsure where to begin
  • Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
  • Deciding which article type fits, or whether to send urgent results to ES&T Letters
  • Returning with a decision letter (route to est-revision-and-rebuttal)

First question: which article type?

SituationTypeRoute to
Full original studyResearch Article (~7,000 words; 待核实)normal pipeline below
Urgent, high-impact result, shortES&T Letters (Letter ≤3,000 words; separate journal)tighten scope; est-submission
Comprehensive synthesis of a fieldCritical Review (~10,000 words; 待核实)est-literature-positioning + est-writing-style
Forward-looking opinion/synthesisPerspective (~4,000 words; 待核实)est-literature-positioning
Magazine-style accessible pieceFeature (~5,000 words; 待核实)est-writing-style
Science–policy interface analysisPolicy Analysis (~7,000 words; 待核实)est-topic-selection + est-writing-style

Word caps are volatile and figures/tables may count as word-equivalents — confirm on the live guidelines page (see 待核实 in resources/official-source-map.md).

Routing map (stage → skill)

Idea / environmental significance? → est-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field?    → est-literature-positioning
Is the study design defensible?    → est-study-design
Are the analyses + QA/QC sound?    → est-data-analysis
Are the exhibits + TOC art clear?  → est-figures-and-tables
SI, data deposit, reproducibility? → est-reporting-and-reproducibility
Does it read in ACS style?         → est-writing-style
Cover letter to the editor?        → est-cover-letter
How will it be judged?             → est-review-process
Ready to submit?                   → est-submission
Got a decision / revision?         → est-revision-and-rebuttal

Default order

topic-selection → literature-positioning → study-design → data-analysis → figures-and-tables → reporting-and-reproducibility → writing-style → cover-letter → review-process → submission → revision-and-rebuttal

Iterate: most papers loop design ↔ analysis ↔ QA/QC several times before writing-style.

Symptom → skill quick-routing

When a user arrives mid-stream with a specific complaint, route by symptom rather than walking the whole pipeline. Each symptom carries the ES&T-specific failure mode it signals:

User saysUnderlying ES&T riskRoute to
"Is this significant enough?"desk-decline on significanceest-topic-selection
"A reviewer said it's not novel"incremental-occurrence framingest-literature-positioning
"Reviewer wants more controls/QA-QC"analytical-rigor gapest-study-design, est-data-analysis
"Mass balance doesn't close"unaccounted-fraction objectionest-data-analysis
"Do I need a TOC graphic?"incomplete-submission gateest-figures-and-tables
"Where do I deposit the data?"data-availability mandateest-reporting-and-reproducibility
"Got a major revision"response-letter strategyest-revision-and-rebuttal

Worked micro-example (illustrative — routing a PFAS-fate manuscript)

A user starts: "I have river PFAS data showing a precursor converting to PFHxA — where do I begin?" The router's pass (illustrative):

  1. Significance checkest-topic-selection: reframe from occurrence to "surveys under-count persistent burden," confirming Research-Article fit.
  2. Positioningest-literature-positioning: engage the fate, analytical, and tox literatures so novelty is mechanistic, not "another dataset."
  3. Design/analysis loopest-study-designest-data-analysis: lock the abiotic control, mass balance, and QA/QC; handle the censored values with ROS.
  4. Exhibits + SIest-figures-and-tables, est-reporting-and-reproducibility: build a concept TOC graphic and deposit data/spectra/code.
  5. Write → cover → submitest-writing-styleest-cover-letterest-submission.

The router's standing job: surface the environmental-significance and QA/QC gates early, because those are what the desk editor and the ~three reviewers weigh first.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating ES&T like a pure-chemistry or pure-engineering journal — the paper must show environmental relevance
  • A clean method with no demonstrated significance for a real environmental system
  • Choosing ES&T Letters for non-urgent work, or ES&T for a result better suited to a specialist venue
  • Leaving the TOC graphic, SI, and data deposit to the last day

Output format

【Stage】idea / positioning / design / analysis / exhibits / reproducibility / writing / cover-letter / review / submit / revise
【Type】Research Article / Critical Review / Feature / Perspective / Policy Analysis / ES&T Letters
【Route to】est-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.