agentsclimarketplace

Est submission

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Environmental-Science-and-Technology-Skills/skills/est-submission

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) via the ACS Publishing Center / ACS Paragon Plus — article-type and word-limit checks, the mandatory TOC graphic, Supporting Information, data-availability statement, ACS style, ORCID, and ethics/COI declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill est-submission

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

6.1 KB, ~1.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Submission Preflight (est-submission)

The last check before pressing submit on the ACS Publishing Center (peer-review environment: ACS Paragon Plus). The most common avoidable failures at ES&T are a missing TOC graphic, an over-limit word count, or an absent data-availability statement. Verify volatile specifics on the official page before relying on them.

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
  • Unsure which files/metadata the ACS submission system expects
  • Confirming the article type's caps are met and the TOC graphic + SI are ready

Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)

  • Publisher: American Chemical Society (ACS).
  • Portal: ACS Publishing Center / ACS Paragon Plus (confirm current entry URL — 待核实).
  • Article types & caps (待核实 on exact numbers): Research Article ~7,000; Feature ~5,000; Review (Critical Review) ~10,000; Perspective ~4,000; Policy Analysis ~7,000; Viewpoint ~1,000 (+≤5 refs); Letter to the Editor ~500. Figures/tables may count as word-equivalents (~300/600 — 待核实).
  • TOC graphic: required for Research Articles, Critical Reviews, Features, Perspectives, and Policy Analysis; not for Viewpoints/Spotlights/Letters.
  • Supporting Information: submitted simultaneously as separate file(s), with an SI paragraph describing contents and file type.
  • Data availability: a data-availability statement plus deposition of data/materials/protocols in public databases (see est-reporting-and-reproducibility).
  • Style: ACS (numbered citations); SI units; ACS chemical conventions.
  • Ethics: COI disclosure; coauthor consent; iThenticate screening; safety hazards in Methods; AI-use disclosed in Acknowledgments; ORCID for the corresponding author (待核实 on exact requirement).

Preflight checklist

Type & length

  • Article type chosen; word count within its cap (counting figure/table word-equivalents)
  • Abstract present and within type norms
  • TOC graphic prepared (required for this type) and meeting ACS size/format specs

Files & content

  • Main manuscript + separate Supporting Information file(s); SI paragraph written
  • Data-availability statement with accession/DOI; data/code deposited
  • Figures/tables self-contained, accessible (see est-figures-and-tables)

Style & metadata

  • ACS numbered citation style; SI units; consistent nomenclature
  • Corresponding-author ORCID ready (待核实)
  • Suggested reviewers (≥4, non-conflicted) and cover letter ready (see est-cover-letter)

Compliance

  • COI disclosure; coauthor consent; ethics/IRB or animal (ARRIVE) statements if relevant
  • Safety/hazard reporting in Methods; AI-use disclosure if applicable
  • Plagiarism self-check; preprint status checked against ACS policy

Avoidable rejection-at-upload table

These are the failures that bounce a manuscript at or just after upload — before science is judged. Each line is a hard gate; confirm the volatile specifics on the live ACS page (待核实):

GatePass conditionWhere it is fixed
TOC graphicpresent + spec-compliant for this article typeest-figures-and-tables
Word countwithin cap incl. figure/table word-equivalentsest-writing-style
Supporting Informationseparate file(s) + SI paragraphest-reporting-and-reproducibility
Data-availability statementpresent with accession/DOIest-reporting-and-reproducibility
Citation styleACS numbered throughoutest-writing-style
DeclarationsCOI, coauthor consent, safety, AI-usethis skill

Worked micro-example (illustrative — final preflight on an emissions-inventory paper)

A Research Article on basin methane attribution, the night before upload (illustrative):

  • Type & length: Research Article; body 6,200 words + two figures counted as word-equivalents (~600 illustrative) → ~6,800, under the ~7,000 cap. Pass.
  • TOC graphic: a basin schematic with super-emitter sites highlighted — a concept, not a clone of the flux map. Pass.
  • SI + data: aircraft flux retrievals, the inversion configuration, and uncertainty budget in the SI; processed fluxes and inversion code on Zenodo with a DOI; data-availability statement written.
  • Declarations: COI none; all coauthors consented; no human/animal subjects; AI-use disclosed in Acknowledgments; corresponding-author ORCID linked (待核实 on exact requirement).
  • The one easy miss: the two figures' word-equivalents were nearly forgotten — counting them is what keeps the paper under cap. This is the single most common avoidable over-limit failure.

Anti-patterns

  • Submitting without the required TOC graphic
  • Over the word cap because exhibits' word-equivalents were not counted
  • No data-availability statement or undeposited data
  • SI uploaded with no SI paragraph describing its contents
  • Non-ACS citation style; missing COI/coauthor-consent declarations

Output format

【Type】Research Article / Critical Review / Feature / Perspective / Policy Analysis (cap met? Y/N)
【TOC graphic】required + present + spec-compliant? [Y/N]
【SI + data-availability statement】present, with accession/DOI? [Y/N]
【ACS style + ORCID】[Y/N]
【Ethics/COI/safety】declared? [Y/N]
【Cover letter + ≥4 reviewers】ready? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → est-revision-and-rebuttal

Supplementary resources

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.